GSP wrote:Lebrons ranked seasons IMO
2013
2009
2010
2012
2011
2008
2006
2007
2005
2004
That's mine with 2010 and 2009 flipped.
Moderators: Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier
GSP wrote:Lebrons ranked seasons IMO
2013
2009
2010
2012
2011
2008
2006
2007
2005
2004
But in his home dwelling...the hi-top faded warrior is revered. *Smack!* The sound of his palm blocking the basketball... the sound of thousands rising, roaring... the sound of "get that sugar honey iced tea outta here!"
SideshowBob wrote:GSP wrote:Lebrons ranked seasons IMO
2013
2009
2010
2012
2011
2008
2006
2007
2005
2004
That's mine with 2010 and 2009 flipped.
SideshowBob wrote:Miami Offensive 4 Factors BreakdownSpoiler:
Not one of them is exceptional, its just a good balance of the 4 leading to insane overall results. 115.3 against a 99.8 DRTG defense is insane.
Code: Select all
Games eFG% ORB% TOV% FT/FGA ORTG
1-6 50.5% 24.7% 11.6% .226 111.5But in his home dwelling...the hi-top faded warrior is revered. *Smack!* The sound of his palm blocking the basketball... the sound of thousands rising, roaring... the sound of "get that sugar honey iced tea outta here!"
ElGee wrote:ardee wrote:There's always a generational talent for each generation. You can't say that we haven't seen evidence of a new one because until the guy is in the pros you can't say. You think at the time people thought Jordan was the GOAT? Or that Duncan would be arguably the most ideal franchise player ever?
It could be Wiggins, it could be Davis, it could be some kid in the second round whom we have no clue about yet, the gap will never remain empty.
On a side not, I personally think it's going to be James Harden.
I think this is fascinating -- why do you think this?
I ask because I see no possible way for this to happen -- like 99.9999% cannot happen -- so I see an area for unearthing how we all see basketball differently. I can explain why if you want, but I'm curious as to why you'd zero in on Harden for something like this...(apologies Sideshow if this should be its own thread)
ardee wrote:There's always a generational talent for each generation. You can't say that we haven't seen evidence of a new one because until the guy is in the pros you can't say. You think at the time people thought Jordan was the GOAT? Or that Duncan would be arguably the most ideal franchise player ever?
It could be Wiggins, it could be Davis, it could be some kid in the second round whom we have no clue about yet, the gap will never remain empty.
On a side not, I personally think it's going to be James Harden.
Coxy wrote:I think with a PG like George Hill, they'd be better than current.
But in his home dwelling...the hi-top faded warrior is revered. *Smack!* The sound of his palm blocking the basketball... the sound of thousands rising, roaring... the sound of "get that sugar honey iced tea outta here!"
ardee wrote:ElGee wrote:ardee wrote:There's always a generational talent for each generation. You can't say that we haven't seen evidence of a new one because until the guy is in the pros you can't say. You think at the time people thought Jordan was the GOAT? Or that Duncan would be arguably the most ideal franchise player ever?
It could be Wiggins, it could be Davis, it could be some kid in the second round whom we have no clue about yet, the gap will never remain empty.
On a side not, I personally think it's going to be James Harden.
I think this is fascinating -- why do you think this?
I ask because I see no possible way for this to happen -- like 99.9999% cannot happen -- so I see an area for unearthing how we all see basketball differently. I can explain why if you want, but I'm curious as to why you'd zero in on Harden for something like this...(apologies Sideshow if this should be its own thread)
Because I see almost no flaws in his offensive game.
ElGee wrote:You don't see a non-existent post game? Or limitations with his entire game inside the arc because of his size? Or that his passing can be erratic and borderline out of control? Or that his motor isn't super high? I mean, just on creation/passing alone you are limiting his offensive ceiling, especially in a context of "generational" player. He's a drive-and-kick creator, and a good/efficient pick-n-roll player. But his decision-making isn't in the same ballpark as guys like James and Nash, nor is his self-creation (I think looking at his shooting map is pretty informative on this front). I haven't even mentioned his undersized, uninspired and unintelligent defense!
You don't seem sensitive so I imagine you won't take this personally, I just think it's a great educational spot -- ask yourself, did you say this about Harden last year when he averaged 16 ppg? My guess is you are getting drawn in by PPG and TS%....because to me, you are "seeing" something in a guy that cannot possibly happen.
Coxy wrote:I think with a PG like George Hill, they'd be better than current.