ermocrate wrote:I really don't care about this trade, no benefit for The Celtics at all beside the picks and a questionable possibility Bledsoe becomes the next MJ, we don't loose any salary and we get worst on the field... We need to trade some contracts for nothing or some guards for a big, acquire a pick or two, carry on for one more year and then rebuild with the cap cleared. If Danny can pull a trade ok if not who cares? We are certainly going to have a better team next year than this year anyway, Green will be more confident, Sully will be more healthy and with one more year of experience and Terry/Lee will be more aware of what means playing in Boston... LA can go to hell...
I agree. I still fail to understand why we can't trade Crawford for a 2nd rounder & get under the tax so we can do a Bradley Bass S&T.
We have a couple keepers.. Rondo Green Pierce Garnett Sully Terry(no value)
Why can't we take the 2 weakest links in our starting line up package them up to get a quality good big (Jeff or Smith or whoever) & run it back? Throw in Melo & a future 2nd for cap & to sweeten the deal I guess.
Rondo-Twill-Vet
Green-Terry-Vet
Pierce-Lee
AJorJS-Sully-Shav
Garnett-16th?-Wilcox
That team healthy with Green & Smith/Jeff being the focal points on offense can contend. Rondo moving the rock around Green & AJ/JS being primary options & PP/KG can play their roles & keep minutes down. I expect Lee won't play as bad. We have a good 8 man rotation. Twill will improve & if we can snag a big in the draft awesome.
It just doesn't make sense to me why we havta give up 1 of the main reasons Celtic basketball was relevant again for an over paid & over rated big man who is on contract for the next 2-3 years? & two late first rounders? It's not a good deal. They should retire in Boston, but if not, we can def more. But i don't see the need to blow it up.