ImageImageImage

Celtics and Clippers Deal #2 UPDATE DEAD, DEAD, DEAD

Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts

User avatar
TommyPoints
General Manager
Posts: 7,559
And1: 4,250
Joined: Feb 14, 2006
Location: Spurs of the East
 

Re: Celtics and Clippers Deal #2 UPDATE DEAD, DEAD, DEAD 

Post#441 » by TommyPoints » Tue Jun 18, 2013 8:36 pm

LobCityClips wrote:
Boston34Bg wrote:
LobCityClips wrote:Adrian Wojnarowski ‏@WojYahooNBA 1m
Doc Rivers will be in Boston on Wednesday and plans to sit down with Danny Ainge, league source says.

You guys think he wants to work it out?



Work out what?

Don't know what you're talking about, Doc will be next to Van Gundy next season.


So no chance at Doc staying to coach?


It was reported after the deal "died" that Ainge wants him to return as coach. We'll see what happens, but that would point to that being his intention unless things change again.
Image
User avatar
165bows
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,189
And1: 15,054
Joined: Jan 03, 2013
Location: The land of incremental improvement.

Re: Celtics and Clippers Deal #2 UPDATE DEAD, DEAD, DEAD 

Post#442 » by 165bows » Tue Jun 18, 2013 8:36 pm

LobCityClips wrote:Ramona Shelburne ‏@ramonashelburne 43s
Put it this way: Clippers were asked to give up 2 first rounders for right to pay Doc $7 mill/per year

Which the Celtics would prefer not pay anyways.


Please stop. Ramona is an LA based reporter, who do you think this info is from? The people still shaking in the knees about, let's say it all together, 'paying Doc 7 MIllION DOLLARS!!' That's who.

If LAC doesn't want to pony up for Doc, no one here cares about that problem.
User avatar
TommyPoints
General Manager
Posts: 7,559
And1: 4,250
Joined: Feb 14, 2006
Location: Spurs of the East
 

Re: Celtics and Clippers Deal #2 UPDATE DEAD, DEAD, DEAD 

Post#443 » by TommyPoints » Tue Jun 18, 2013 8:39 pm

wizardg wrote:
JLaz92 wrote:
LobCityClips wrote:I understand WHY you guys have big attachments to your people and as fans we always value our assets higher than others but here me out Celtics fans. The reasons this deal was more vital to your team than the Clippers are...

You're losing Doc, KG and Pierce this summer now anyways most likely, why not at least get SOMETHING for them. Pierce was already being bought out, Doc was already getting cold feet (you guys made a thread 3 weeks ago about moving on from him) and KG was contemplating retirement if Celtics go into rebuilding.

Clippers were going to settle the finances with you guys for Doc, DJ is 24 with upside still and if he doesn't work out can be flipped next deadline for decent value with a year left on the deal. The Clippers on the other hand are strong favorites to keep CP3 anyways and don't mind keeping young assets to trade.

Now so much has emotionally been invested by both sides that to break the deal up is going to have huge repercussions, especially with Boston as I said.


So taking on the useless DeAndre Jordan and his large contract along with the 25th pick in the draft is supposed to make me want to give you Doc Rivers and Kevin Garnett? :roll:

Um no, I'd rather see KG retire a Celtic and Doc sit in a TNT booth and look miserable.



One of the Celtics problems is that most NBA players don't like Boston. That's where Doc came in his rep changed the equation to Boston. After this fiasco. Its gonna make Boston even less favorable NBA FA destination.

Sometimes its not about trying to squeeze every drop out of the orange. Sometimes its about class.

Ainge and Doc knew his contract was never to be fulfilled. like a 50 years who buys a house on a 30 mortgage. And Ainge knew that Garnett and Pierce wanted to play in LA if the Celtics blew it up.

If Doc, PP, and Garnett are soured by the way their end in Boston plays out. Ainge losses credibility with the NBA players.

Before Garnett almost nobody wanted any part of Boston, remember Garnett almost passed on Boston. Ainge had to overpay to get Jet and Lee last year.

Good Luck


Yeah, Boston has never been a favorite FA destination unless it was when they are contending. The rest of this is nothing, but speculation. Ainge has done nothing that has been reported for the players or coach to have any negative feelings towards the organization.
Image
KGboss
RealGM
Posts: 21,217
And1: 10,097
Joined: Mar 03, 2011
Location: Boston Garden
       

Re: Celtics and Clippers Deal #2 UPDATE DEAD, DEAD, DEAD 

Post#444 » by KGboss » Tue Jun 18, 2013 8:39 pm

165bows wrote:
LobCityClips wrote:Ramona Shelburne ‏@ramonashelburne 43s
Put it this way: Clippers were asked to give up 2 first rounders for right to pay Doc $7 mill/per year

Which the Celtics would prefer not pay anyways.


Please stop. Ramona is an LA based reporter, who do you think this info is from? The people still shaking in the knees about, let's say it all together, 'paying Doc 7 MIllION DOLLARS!!' That's who.

If LAC doesn't want to pony up for Doc, no one here cares about that problem.


Thats what Doc is worth. He is a top 3 coach in this league right now. If they cant afford him why are they trying?
User avatar
TommyPoints
General Manager
Posts: 7,559
And1: 4,250
Joined: Feb 14, 2006
Location: Spurs of the East
 

Re: Celtics and Clippers Deal #2 UPDATE DEAD, DEAD, DEAD 

Post#445 » by TommyPoints » Tue Jun 18, 2013 8:41 pm

KGboss wrote:
165bows wrote:
LobCityClips wrote:Ramona Shelburne ‏@ramonashelburne 43s
Put it this way: Clippers were asked to give up 2 first rounders for right to pay Doc $7 mill/per year

Which the Celtics would prefer not pay anyways.


Please stop. Ramona is an LA based reporter, who do you think this info is from? The people still shaking in the knees about, let's say it all together, 'paying Doc 7 MIllION DOLLARS!!' That's who.

If LAC doesn't want to pony up for Doc, no one here cares about that problem.


Thats what Doc is worth. He is a top 3 coach in this league right now. If they cant afford him why are they trying?


This is from an outsiders perspective but I don't even know why Paul would want to stay there. Are they serious about winning or what? Either sit at the big boy table or take a hike.
Image
User avatar
Captain_Caveman
RealGM
Posts: 25,904
And1: 38,513
Joined: Jun 25, 2007
       

Re: Celtics and Clippers Deal #2 UPDATE DEAD, DEAD, DEAD 

Post#446 » by Captain_Caveman » Tue Jun 18, 2013 8:42 pm

LobCityClips wrote:I understand WHY you guys have big attachments to your people and as fans we always value our assets higher than others but here me out Celtics fans. The reasons this deal was more vital to your team than the Clippers are...

You're losing Doc, KG and Pierce this summer now anyways most likely, why not at least get SOMETHING for them. Pierce was already being bought out, Doc was already getting cold feet (you guys made a thread 3 weeks ago about moving on from him) and KG was contemplating retirement if Celtics go into rebuilding.

Clippers were going to settle the finances with you guys for Doc, DJ is 24 with upside still and if he doesn't work out can be flipped next deadline for decent value with a year left on the deal. The Clippers on the other hand are strong favorites to keep CP3 anyways and don't mind keeping young assets to trade.

Now so much has emotionally been invested by both sides that to break the deal up is going to have huge repercussions, especially with Boston as I said.


Homie, I live in SoCal, and IMO DeAndre is a dumpster fire. I wouldn't take him and the 25th pick for free. At 11m a year (and 13m cap hits), the opportunity cost of DeAndre is just too high.

I would *much* prefer to get nothing. So would anyone who has actually watched him play.
User avatar
Debaser
Starter
Posts: 2,246
And1: 163
Joined: May 24, 2006

Re: Celtics and Clippers Deal #2 UPDATE DEAD, DEAD, DEAD 

Post#447 » by Debaser » Tue Jun 18, 2013 8:46 pm

wizardg wrote:One of the Celtics problems is that most NBA players don't like Boston. That's where Doc came in his rep changed the equation to Boston. After this fiasco. Its gonna make Boston even less favorable NBA FA destination.

Sometimes its not about trying to squeeze every drop out of the orange. Sometimes its about class.

Ainge and Doc knew his contract was never to be fulfilled. like a 50 years who buys a house on a 30 mortgage. And Ainge knew that Garnett and Pierce wanted to play in LA if the Celtics blew it up.

If Doc, PP, and Garnett are soured by the way their end in Boston plays out. Ainge losses credibility with the NBA players.

Before Garnett almost nobody wanted any part of Boston, remember Garnett almost passed on Boston. Ainge had to overpay to get Jet and Lee last year.

Good Luck


How can someone, a mod no less, be allowed to post this crap here? Nobody wants to play for your team, your GM is being greedy and will lose all credibility, wah wah wah. Wishing the most successful franchise luck? Please. Why don't you worry about your own team and stop trolling here.
Berkcelt
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,305
And1: 332
Joined: Dec 12, 2008

Re: Celtics and Clippers Deal #2 UPDATE DEAD, DEAD, DEAD 

Post#448 » by Berkcelt » Tue Jun 18, 2013 8:47 pm

CelticGamecock wrote:This is from an outsiders perspective but I don't even know why Paul would want to stay there. Are they serious about winning or what? Either sit at the big boy table or take a hike.


I think the idea is more deals are to come. The only things I've heard is Blake for Dwight, and Bledsoe for Afflalo or Granger. The former seems like a pipe dream to me, and the latter seems like a minor or second tier move. But we haven't even reached the draft or offseason so who knows what might happen.
User avatar
Collinto
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,601
And1: 25
Joined: Apr 10, 2001

Re: Celtics and Clippers Deal #2 UPDATE DEAD, DEAD, DEAD 

Post#449 » by Collinto » Tue Jun 18, 2013 8:47 pm

LobCityClips wrote:Adrian Wojnarowski ‏@WojYahooNBA 1m

As much as Rivers wanted Clippers job, Boston management wanted to use deal to speed up rebuilding process. Ainge and Rivers aren't at odds.


The negotiation is still on...my guess is that the Clips step back with the intention to see if Boston blinks and/or if the public negotiation has splintered the relationship between Boston, Doc and KG. It gives them leverage on two fronts, 1. get to dance with with Shaw and Scott; 2. get to see if any 'bad blood' comes out from the Boston side. At the end of the day, it is likely Chris Paul and the impact of bringing in KG/Doc to his resigning that gets this done (or not).
User avatar
ermocrate
General Manager
Posts: 9,622
And1: 1,623
Joined: Apr 19, 2001
Location: Roma
Contact:
   

Re: Celtics and Clippers Deal #2 UPDATE DEAD, DEAD, DEAD 

Post#450 » by ermocrate » Tue Jun 18, 2013 8:47 pm

Captain_Caveman wrote:
LobCityClips wrote:I understand WHY you guys have big attachments to your people and as fans we always value our assets higher than others but here me out Celtics fans. The reasons this deal was more vital to your team than the Clippers are...

You're losing Doc, KG and Pierce this summer now anyways most likely, why not at least get SOMETHING for them. Pierce was already being bought out, Doc was already getting cold feet (you guys made a thread 3 weeks ago about moving on from him) and KG was contemplating retirement if Celtics go into rebuilding.

Clippers were going to settle the finances with you guys for Doc, DJ is 24 with upside still and if he doesn't work out can be flipped next deadline for decent value with a year left on the deal. The Clippers on the other hand are strong favorites to keep CP3 anyways and don't mind keeping young assets to trade.

Now so much has emotionally been invested by both sides that to break the deal up is going to have huge repercussions, especially with Boston as I said.


Homie, I live in SoCal, and IMO DeAndre is a dumpster fire. I wouldn't take him and the 25th pick for free. At 11m a year (and 13m cap hits), the opportunity cost of DeAndre is just too high.

I would *much* prefer to get nothing. So would anyone who has actually watched him play.

Exactly my feelings...
"Negativity in this town sucks"
User avatar
SuperDeluxe
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 24,009
And1: 23,834
Joined: Feb 23, 2003
Location: Celtic Nation
   

Re: Celtics and Clippers Deal #2 UPDATE DEAD, DEAD, DEAD 

Post#451 » by SuperDeluxe » Tue Jun 18, 2013 8:49 pm

wizardg wrote:Sometimes its not about trying to squeeze every drop out of the orange. Sometimes its about class.

With all due respect, you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.
User avatar
campybatman
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,100
And1: 185
Joined: Apr 19, 2007

Re: Celtics and Clippers Deal #2 UPDATE DEAD, DEAD, DEAD 

Post#452 » by campybatman » Tue Jun 18, 2013 8:50 pm

Ainge must walk away from the negotiating table. This is a no-win situation. Because Boston wanted to negotiate a deal while the Clippers wanted to dictate the deal. You can't expect for a deal to come to fruition if one party [Los Angeles] isn't willing to concede anything from their end. No, the Clippers thought that they could get something for nothing and was content with their low-ball offer. If you're Ainge, you don't settle under no circumstances. If you want Bledsoe and two first round picks, then you fight for that. Conversely, nobody wants the overpaid Jordan with his 15% trade kicker. I mean, even Ainge isn't that gullible, nor are the Boston fans. If Ainge wants to save face, then end the talks for good because it isn't worth it.
User avatar
165bows
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,189
And1: 15,054
Joined: Jan 03, 2013
Location: The land of incremental improvement.

Re: Celtics and Clippers Deal #2 UPDATE DEAD, DEAD, DEAD 

Post#453 » by 165bows » Tue Jun 18, 2013 8:50 pm

SuperDeluxe wrote:
wizardg wrote:Sometimes its not about trying to squeeze every drop out of the orange. Sometimes its about class.

With all due respect, you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.


The Celtics should look closely to the Clippers org for an example.
FlatearthZorro
RealGM
Posts: 20,599
And1: 12,343
Joined: Feb 12, 2010
Location: Somewhere in Boston
     

Re: Celtics and Clippers Deal #2 UPDATE DEAD, DEAD, DEAD 

Post#454 » by FlatearthZorro » Tue Jun 18, 2013 8:54 pm

165bows wrote:
SuperDeluxe wrote:
wizardg wrote:Sometimes its not about trying to squeeze every drop out of the orange. Sometimes its about class.

With all due respect, you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.


The Celtics should look closely to the Clippers org for an example.




Clips are such a classy organisation. I totally agree with you, can't wait til they win their 1st championship next season with a core of D Jordan/ Griffin and Cliff Paul. Also yesterday I found out that Matt Barnes is just as worthy as Paul Pierce, valueable info from Clipper fans.

World class organisation and their fan base is fantastic too, they have so much knowledge when it comes to b-ball.
Good assessment:

PLO wrote:Tatum played OK - took advantage of a few mismatches - decent on the defensive end. He is what we thought he was going into the season - a technically very proficient player operating close to his career ceiling as a rookie.
User avatar
DJToLarry
Pro Prospect
Posts: 911
And1: 38
Joined: Aug 02, 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: Celtics and Clippers Deal #2 UPDATE DEAD, DEAD, DEAD 

Post#455 » by DJToLarry » Tue Jun 18, 2013 8:54 pm

I just don't see how Doc can continue as coach. He just signed that contract, and knew they would have to rebuild. Now maybe Doc told Ainge he will not coach the Cs, and didn't leak it as to take away all of the Celtic's leverage in trying to get something for Doc. So that was the reason Doc has been quiet through all of this. As it stands I just see one option for Doc, and that's to resign. Go work in TV. Why would management want someone who doesn't really want his job?
Image
User avatar
ermocrate
General Manager
Posts: 9,622
And1: 1,623
Joined: Apr 19, 2001
Location: Roma
Contact:
   

Re: Celtics and Clippers Deal #2 UPDATE DEAD, DEAD, DEAD 

Post#456 » by ermocrate » Tue Jun 18, 2013 8:55 pm

Why don't we offer Bass and a first to SA for Popovic and Tim Duncan, look like an offer they can't turn down... :lol:
"Negativity in this town sucks"
LobCityClips
Banned User
Posts: 1,014
And1: 104
Joined: Mar 03, 2013

Re: Celtics and Clippers Deal #2 UPDATE DEAD, DEAD, DEAD 

Post#457 » by LobCityClips » Tue Jun 18, 2013 8:56 pm

You live in LA and watched the Clippers a few times and you're going to puff your chest out at a guy who hasn't missed a Clipper game in about 9 years? I'm well aware of DJ's shortcomings but to act like he's a NEGATIVE player is patently false and in opposition to facts. He's a 13 ppg, 11 rpg, 2 bpg PER 36 player who had the highest field goal percentage in the league and plays above average defense. His PER wasn't much worse than KG's this year at 17. Point is, overpaid like all decent centers yes. Very flawed and raw, yes. "Garbage", absolutely not. Unless you don't know the game of basketball and analyze the game on small sample sizes or what others tell you.
User avatar
TommyPoints
General Manager
Posts: 7,559
And1: 4,250
Joined: Feb 14, 2006
Location: Spurs of the East
 

Re: Celtics and Clippers Deal #2 UPDATE DEAD, DEAD, DEAD 

Post#458 » by TommyPoints » Tue Jun 18, 2013 8:57 pm

LobCityClips wrote:You live in LA and watched the Clippers a few times and you're going to puff your chest out at a guy who hasn't missed a Clipper game in about 9 years? I'm well aware of DJ's shortcomings but to act like he's a NEGATIVE player is patently false and in opposition to facts. He's a 13 ppg, 11 rpg, 2 bpg PER 36 player who had the highest field goal percentage in the league and plays above average defense. His PER wasn't much worse than KG's this year at 17. Point is, overpaid like all decent centers yes. Very flawed and raw, yes. "Garbage", absolutely not. Unless you don't know the game of basketball and analyze the game on small sample sizes or what others tell you.


Sounds like a winner. You guys should hang on to that stud and he can anchor your championship next season.
Image
User avatar
ermocrate
General Manager
Posts: 9,622
And1: 1,623
Joined: Apr 19, 2001
Location: Roma
Contact:
   

Re: Celtics and Clippers Deal #2 UPDATE DEAD, DEAD, DEAD 

Post#459 » by ermocrate » Tue Jun 18, 2013 8:59 pm

Is Benoit Benjamin an Hall of Famer?
"Negativity in this town sucks"
LobCityClips
Banned User
Posts: 1,014
And1: 104
Joined: Mar 03, 2013

Re: Celtics and Clippers Deal #2 UPDATE DEAD, DEAD, DEAD 

Post#460 » by LobCityClips » Tue Jun 18, 2013 8:59 pm

CelticGamecock wrote:
LobCityClips wrote:You live in LA and watched the Clippers a few times and you're going to puff your chest out at a guy who hasn't missed a Clipper game in about 9 years? I'm well aware of DJ's shortcomings but to act like he's a NEGATIVE player is patently false and in opposition to facts. He's a 13 ppg, 11 rpg, 2 bpg PER 36 player who had the highest field goal percentage in the league and plays above average defense. His PER wasn't much worse than KG's this year at 17. Point is, overpaid like all decent centers yes. Very flawed and raw, yes. "Garbage", absolutely not. Unless you don't know the game of basketball and analyze the game on small sample sizes or what others tell you.


Sounds like a winner. You guys should hang on to that stud and he can anchor your championship next season.


If we want to wait 3 years we would. Like I said the whole DJ issue has to do with the Clippers wanting to win NOW as in this year. He's a slow but sure developer so far.. and the team just needs somebody who's ready NOW for these big runs.

Return to Boston Celtics