rcklsscognition wrote:RickB-Orlando wrote:rcklsscognition wrote:It would be stupid if the Celtics are forced to keep Doc just because of Stern. I wouldn't want him back if I was Boston. He should just quit.
Absolutely. Other than the what, 21 million reasons not to quit, that is?
It didn't come across clearly, but I meant quit in terms of the idea that he quits and then is signed by LAC. Boston would agree to waive the non-compete clause and let him go. They should all have the right to do that.
Gotcha. Yeah, sorry, I didn't get that from your post.
The problem with that is Boston wants compensation, which is their right. So if they can do a deal that is just Doc, released from his contract in return for say a first round pick, that would be fine. The risk is they then try to trade Jordan and a first rounder for Garnett and Stern vetoes it (because they would clearly be related deals).
Now what? A reasonable scenario that then could play out is that CP3 is unhappy because he wanted them to get KG, so he leaves. Which leaves Doc in basically the same position as Boston, a mediocre team that needs to retool, so he's unhappy as well. Heck, KG could even retire.
In one move Stern effectively screws LA, Boston, KG, CP3, Doc, and the Clipper fans. I guess Boston comes out thembest because then they tank and get rewarded with Wiggins in 2014.