Jodi wrote:^You disagree?..
C'mon now, that is ridiculous hommerism right there. Prime Nick Young ( 17ppg) is a lot more realistic.
Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites
Jodi wrote:^You disagree?..
c-dot wrote:Jodi wrote:^You disagree?..
C'mon now, that is ridiculous hommerism right there. Prime Nick Young ( 17ppg) is a lot more realistic.
ComboGuardCity wrote:c-dot wrote:Jodi wrote:^You disagree?..
C'mon now, that is ridiculous hommerism right there. Prime Nick Young ( 17ppg) is a lot more realistic.
He's not tmac but he also has a higher ceiling than Nick Young
Natopher wrote:Definitely not T-Mac, but I think he's floor is higher than Nick Young. Nick young is nothing more than a 3pt shooter. KCP is already more than that.
c-dot wrote:ComboGuardCity wrote:c-dot wrote:
C'mon now, that is ridiculous hommerism right there. Prime Nick Young ( 17ppg) is a lot more realistic.
He's not tmac but he also has a higher ceiling than Nick Young
Based on what? Nick Young was 6'7 had a 40+ inch vert and shot 52% from the field and 44% from 3 coming out of college. He would have been a top 3-5 pick in this draft imo. Nick just fell off after he left Washington, he couldn't find a good fit.
bkseven wrote:He's between average and above average.
Dirtgrain wrote:How does he compare to Richard Jefferson?
bkseven wrote:He's between average and above average.