What about Nash?
Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites
What about Nash?
- The Penguin
- "Beat The Commish" Champion/Mr. Clean Slate
- Posts: 7,267
- And1: 4,109
- Joined: Nov 17, 2006
- Location: Columbus
-
What about Nash?
With the Lakers losing Dwight, Kobe coming off an ACL and their projected cap room in 2014 it may be time for them to rebuild a bit. Currently Nash is the only one on the books next summer, anyone have any guesses if he might be available and at what cost? Given his age and their position would Stuckey's expiring deal and sweetener be a offensive offer? I think it'd be nice to bring in a vet pg who can still play and is willing to serve as a BK mentor.
Re: What about Nash?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,836
- And1: 553
- Joined: Jul 23, 2002
-
Re: What about Nash?
Piston Prince wrote:With the Lakers losing Dwight, Kobe coming off an ACL and their projected cap room in 2014 it may be time for them to rebuild a bit. Currently Nash is the only one on the books next summer, anyone have any guesses if he might be available and at what cost? Given his age and their position would Stuckey's expiring deal and sweetener be a offensive offer? I think it'd be nice to bring in a vet pg who can still play and is willing to serve as a BK mentor.
They aren't trading Nash so that is a bad idea. I'm sure if they did consider it they would want Monroe to which I would say no.
Re: What about Nash?
- The Penguin
- "Beat The Commish" Champion/Mr. Clean Slate
- Posts: 7,267
- And1: 4,109
- Joined: Nov 17, 2006
- Location: Columbus
-
Re: What about Nash?
DetroitDon15 wrote:Piston Prince wrote:With the Lakers losing Dwight, Kobe coming off an ACL and their projected cap room in 2014 it may be time for them to rebuild a bit. Currently Nash is the only one on the books next summer, anyone have any guesses if he might be available and at what cost? Given his age and their position would Stuckey's expiring deal and sweetener be a offensive offer? I think it'd be nice to bring in a vet pg who can still play and is willing to serve as a BK mentor.
They aren't trading Nash so that is a bad idea. I'm sure if they did consider it they would want Monroe to which I would say no.
While I agree it's not likely they'd trade Nash as I can't imagine Kobe would be ok with it, I don't believe they'd think Monroe is a realistic conversation piece.
Re: What about Nash?
- Laimbeer
- RealGM
- Posts: 43,017
- And1: 15,128
- Joined: Aug 12, 2009
- Location: Cabin Creek
-
Re: What about Nash?
DetroitDon15 wrote:Piston Prince wrote:With the Lakers losing Dwight, Kobe coming off an ACL and their projected cap room in 2014 it may be time for them to rebuild a bit. Currently Nash is the only one on the books next summer, anyone have any guesses if he might be available and at what cost? Given his age and their position would Stuckey's expiring deal and sweetener be a offensive offer? I think it'd be nice to bring in a vet pg who can still play and is willing to serve as a BK mentor.
They aren't trading Nash so that is a bad idea. I'm sure if they did consider it they would want Monroe to which I would say no.
Whoa, I don't think even the Lakers would expect Monroe for Nash at this point. Great player in his day, but he's closer to middle-of-the pack than elite now.
Comments to rationalize bad contracts -
1) It's less than the MLE
2) He can be traded later
3) It's only __% of the cap
4) The cap is going up
5) It's only __ years
6) He's a good mentor/locker room guy
1) It's less than the MLE
2) He can be traded later
3) It's only __% of the cap
4) The cap is going up
5) It's only __ years
6) He's a good mentor/locker room guy
Re: What about Nash?
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,299
- And1: 263
- Joined: Apr 05, 2006
- Location: Boston, MA
- Contact:
-
Re: What about Nash?
I would guess a pick and expiring could net you Nash at this point. LA is not competing, and they'd like out of his contract I imagine. Don't think he's a good fit though.
DOLEO Podcast
http://doleopodcast.com
http://doleopodcast.com
Re: What about Nash?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,836
- And1: 553
- Joined: Jul 23, 2002
-
Re: What about Nash?
Laimbeer wrote:DetroitDon15 wrote:Piston Prince wrote:With the Lakers losing Dwight, Kobe coming off an ACL and their projected cap room in 2014 it may be time for them to rebuild a bit. Currently Nash is the only one on the books next summer, anyone have any guesses if he might be available and at what cost? Given his age and their position would Stuckey's expiring deal and sweetener be a offensive offer? I think it'd be nice to bring in a vet pg who can still play and is willing to serve as a BK mentor.
They aren't trading Nash so that is a bad idea. I'm sure if they did consider it they would want Monroe to which I would say no.
Whoa, I don't think even the Lakers would expect Monroe for Nash at this point. Great player in his day, but he's closer to middle-of-the pack than elite now.
I think the Pistons have to move Monroe now but Nash isn't the guy.
Re: What about Nash?
-
- Forum Mod - Pistons
- Posts: 16,869
- And1: 3,460
- Joined: May 22, 2001
- Location: Santa Cruz, CA
-
Re: What about Nash?
DetroitDon15 wrote:Laimbeer wrote:DetroitDon15 wrote:
They aren't trading Nash so that is a bad idea. I'm sure if they did consider it they would want Monroe to which I would say no.
Whoa, I don't think even the Lakers would expect Monroe for Nash at this point. Great player in his day, but he's closer to middle-of-the pack than elite now.
I think the Pistons have to move Monroe now but Nash isn't the guy.
Pistons don't have to move Monroe. That would be a big mistake.
Re: What about Nash?
- Sheedpocalypse
- Junior
- Posts: 264
- And1: 157
- Joined: May 23, 2013
- Location: Antwerp - Belgium
-
Re: What about Nash?
We're not trading a core young player and potential all-star for an over the hill (but future hall of fame) PG. No way 

Detroit vs Everybody by way of Belgium.
Re: What about Nash?
- Piston Pete
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,070
- And1: 1,352
- Joined: Feb 07, 2002
- Location: Way out in left field
Re: What about Nash?
Steve Nash
for
Rodney Stuckey (expiring)
Kyle Singler
This trade let's them COMPLETELY start over next season. They would have an entire roster of expirings plus whoever they drafted this season and Singler. They'd be MAJOR players next year in free agency (LeBron, Wade, Melo, Bosh, etc.).
for
Rodney Stuckey (expiring)
Kyle Singler
This trade let's them COMPLETELY start over next season. They would have an entire roster of expirings plus whoever they drafted this season and Singler. They'd be MAJOR players next year in free agency (LeBron, Wade, Melo, Bosh, etc.).
Re: What about Nash?
- Piston Pete
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,070
- And1: 1,352
- Joined: Feb 07, 2002
- Location: Way out in left field
Re: What about Nash?
Piston Pete wrote:Steve Nash
for
Rodney Stuckey (expiring)
Kyle Singler
This trade let's them COMPLETELY start over next season. They would have an entire roster of expirings plus whoever they drafted this season and Singler. They'd be MAJOR players next year in free agency (LeBron, Wade, Melo, Bosh, etc.).
FYI, someone posted Nash for Stuckey on the T&T board, and the Lakers fans like it so far.....
Re: What about Nash?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,836
- And1: 553
- Joined: Jul 23, 2002
-
Re: What about Nash?
Piston Pete wrote:Piston Pete wrote:Steve Nash
for
Rodney Stuckey (expiring)
Kyle Singler
This trade let's them COMPLETELY start over next season. They would have an entire roster of expirings plus whoever they drafted this season and Singler. They'd be MAJOR players next year in free agency (LeBron, Wade, Melo, Bosh, etc.).
FYI, someone posted Nash for Stuckey on the T&T board, and the Lakers fans like it so far.....
Lakers dealt so many future picks in the Dwight and Nash moves, rebuild would be very hard plus Kobe won't be down for it.
Re: What about Nash?
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,465
- And1: 2,323
- Joined: Apr 01, 2013
-
Re: What about Nash?
Who the heck wants the crypt keeper anymore?

Re: What about Nash?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,836
- And1: 553
- Joined: Jul 23, 2002
-
Re: What about Nash?
theBigLip wrote:DetroitDon15 wrote:Laimbeer wrote:
Whoa, I don't think even the Lakers would expect Monroe for Nash at this point. Great player in his day, but he's closer to middle-of-the pack than elite now.
I think the Pistons have to move Monroe now but Nash isn't the guy.
Pistons don't have to move Monroe. That would be a big mistake.
I don't see Smith being his best at SF and if a team would be willing to part with a young rising star at PG. Detroit moves him. Look what Paul did for the Clips, Irving for the Cavs, and Lillard for the Blazers. IMHO, Point Guard is the most important spot in the league.
Re: What about Nash?
- Snakebites
- Forum Mod - Pistons
- Posts: 51,069
- And1: 18,145
- Joined: Jul 14, 2002
- Location: Looking not-so-happily deranged
-
Re: What about Nash?
^Irving is a great player, but what exactly has he done for the Cavs?
They've still had top 4 lottery positions in each of his seasons.
But yeah, I think its fairly academic that an upgrade at point is a must, and I still don't think Knight is that guy.
They've still had top 4 lottery positions in each of his seasons.
But yeah, I think its fairly academic that an upgrade at point is a must, and I still don't think Knight is that guy.
Re: What about Nash?
- mamadontcry
- Senior
- Posts: 647
- And1: 342
- Joined: Nov 11, 2012
- Location: downunder