ImageImageImage

What about Nash?

Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites

User avatar
The Penguin
"Beat The Commish" Champion/Mr. Clean Slate
Posts: 7,267
And1: 4,109
Joined: Nov 17, 2006
Location: Columbus
     

What about Nash? 

Post#1 » by The Penguin » Mon Jul 8, 2013 1:49 pm

With the Lakers losing Dwight, Kobe coming off an ACL and their projected cap room in 2014 it may be time for them to rebuild a bit. Currently Nash is the only one on the books next summer, anyone have any guesses if he might be available and at what cost? Given his age and their position would Stuckey's expiring deal and sweetener be a offensive offer? I think it'd be nice to bring in a vet pg who can still play and is willing to serve as a BK mentor.
DetroitDon15
General Manager
Posts: 8,836
And1: 553
Joined: Jul 23, 2002
         

Re: What about Nash? 

Post#2 » by DetroitDon15 » Mon Jul 8, 2013 1:57 pm

Piston Prince wrote:With the Lakers losing Dwight, Kobe coming off an ACL and their projected cap room in 2014 it may be time for them to rebuild a bit. Currently Nash is the only one on the books next summer, anyone have any guesses if he might be available and at what cost? Given his age and their position would Stuckey's expiring deal and sweetener be a offensive offer? I think it'd be nice to bring in a vet pg who can still play and is willing to serve as a BK mentor.


They aren't trading Nash so that is a bad idea. I'm sure if they did consider it they would want Monroe to which I would say no.
User avatar
The Penguin
"Beat The Commish" Champion/Mr. Clean Slate
Posts: 7,267
And1: 4,109
Joined: Nov 17, 2006
Location: Columbus
     

Re: What about Nash? 

Post#3 » by The Penguin » Mon Jul 8, 2013 2:09 pm

DetroitDon15 wrote:
Piston Prince wrote:With the Lakers losing Dwight, Kobe coming off an ACL and their projected cap room in 2014 it may be time for them to rebuild a bit. Currently Nash is the only one on the books next summer, anyone have any guesses if he might be available and at what cost? Given his age and their position would Stuckey's expiring deal and sweetener be a offensive offer? I think it'd be nice to bring in a vet pg who can still play and is willing to serve as a BK mentor.


They aren't trading Nash so that is a bad idea. I'm sure if they did consider it they would want Monroe to which I would say no.



While I agree it's not likely they'd trade Nash as I can't imagine Kobe would be ok with it, I don't believe they'd think Monroe is a realistic conversation piece.
User avatar
Laimbeer
RealGM
Posts: 43,017
And1: 15,128
Joined: Aug 12, 2009
Location: Cabin Creek
     

Re: What about Nash? 

Post#4 » by Laimbeer » Mon Jul 8, 2013 3:22 pm

DetroitDon15 wrote:
Piston Prince wrote:With the Lakers losing Dwight, Kobe coming off an ACL and their projected cap room in 2014 it may be time for them to rebuild a bit. Currently Nash is the only one on the books next summer, anyone have any guesses if he might be available and at what cost? Given his age and their position would Stuckey's expiring deal and sweetener be a offensive offer? I think it'd be nice to bring in a vet pg who can still play and is willing to serve as a BK mentor.


They aren't trading Nash so that is a bad idea. I'm sure if they did consider it they would want Monroe to which I would say no.


Whoa, I don't think even the Lakers would expect Monroe for Nash at this point. Great player in his day, but he's closer to middle-of-the pack than elite now.
Comments to rationalize bad contracts -
1) It's less than the MLE
2) He can be traded later
3) It's only __% of the cap
4) The cap is going up
5) It's only __ years
6) He's a good mentor/locker room guy
Who-rod
Starter
Posts: 2,299
And1: 263
Joined: Apr 05, 2006
Location: Boston, MA
Contact:
 

Re: What about Nash? 

Post#5 » by Who-rod » Mon Jul 8, 2013 6:34 pm

I would guess a pick and expiring could net you Nash at this point. LA is not competing, and they'd like out of his contract I imagine. Don't think he's a good fit though.
DetroitDon15
General Manager
Posts: 8,836
And1: 553
Joined: Jul 23, 2002
         

Re: What about Nash? 

Post#6 » by DetroitDon15 » Mon Jul 8, 2013 7:09 pm

Laimbeer wrote:
DetroitDon15 wrote:
Piston Prince wrote:With the Lakers losing Dwight, Kobe coming off an ACL and their projected cap room in 2014 it may be time for them to rebuild a bit. Currently Nash is the only one on the books next summer, anyone have any guesses if he might be available and at what cost? Given his age and their position would Stuckey's expiring deal and sweetener be a offensive offer? I think it'd be nice to bring in a vet pg who can still play and is willing to serve as a BK mentor.


They aren't trading Nash so that is a bad idea. I'm sure if they did consider it they would want Monroe to which I would say no.


Whoa, I don't think even the Lakers would expect Monroe for Nash at this point. Great player in his day, but he's closer to middle-of-the pack than elite now.


I think the Pistons have to move Monroe now but Nash isn't the guy.
theBigLip
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 16,869
And1: 3,460
Joined: May 22, 2001
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
       

Re: What about Nash? 

Post#7 » by theBigLip » Mon Jul 8, 2013 10:19 pm

DetroitDon15 wrote:
Laimbeer wrote:
DetroitDon15 wrote:
They aren't trading Nash so that is a bad idea. I'm sure if they did consider it they would want Monroe to which I would say no.


Whoa, I don't think even the Lakers would expect Monroe for Nash at this point. Great player in his day, but he's closer to middle-of-the pack than elite now.


I think the Pistons have to move Monroe now but Nash isn't the guy.


Pistons don't have to move Monroe. That would be a big mistake.
User avatar
Sheedpocalypse
Junior
Posts: 264
And1: 157
Joined: May 23, 2013
Location: Antwerp - Belgium
     

Re: What about Nash? 

Post#8 » by Sheedpocalypse » Mon Jul 8, 2013 10:24 pm

We're not trading a core young player and potential all-star for an over the hill (but future hall of fame) PG. No way :)
Detroit vs Everybody by way of Belgium.
User avatar
Piston Pete
RealGM
Posts: 19,070
And1: 1,352
Joined: Feb 07, 2002
Location: Way out in left field

Re: What about Nash? 

Post#9 » by Piston Pete » Mon Jul 8, 2013 10:29 pm

Steve Nash

for

Rodney Stuckey (expiring)
Kyle Singler


This trade let's them COMPLETELY start over next season. They would have an entire roster of expirings plus whoever they drafted this season and Singler. They'd be MAJOR players next year in free agency (LeBron, Wade, Melo, Bosh, etc.).
User avatar
Piston Pete
RealGM
Posts: 19,070
And1: 1,352
Joined: Feb 07, 2002
Location: Way out in left field

Re: What about Nash? 

Post#10 » by Piston Pete » Tue Jul 9, 2013 4:23 am

Piston Pete wrote:Steve Nash

for

Rodney Stuckey (expiring)
Kyle Singler


This trade let's them COMPLETELY start over next season. They would have an entire roster of expirings plus whoever they drafted this season and Singler. They'd be MAJOR players next year in free agency (LeBron, Wade, Melo, Bosh, etc.).


FYI, someone posted Nash for Stuckey on the T&T board, and the Lakers fans like it so far.....
DetroitDon15
General Manager
Posts: 8,836
And1: 553
Joined: Jul 23, 2002
         

Re: What about Nash? 

Post#11 » by DetroitDon15 » Tue Jul 9, 2013 2:41 pm

Piston Pete wrote:
Piston Pete wrote:Steve Nash

for

Rodney Stuckey (expiring)
Kyle Singler


This trade let's them COMPLETELY start over next season. They would have an entire roster of expirings plus whoever they drafted this season and Singler. They'd be MAJOR players next year in free agency (LeBron, Wade, Melo, Bosh, etc.).


FYI, someone posted Nash for Stuckey on the T&T board, and the Lakers fans like it so far.....


Lakers dealt so many future picks in the Dwight and Nash moves, rebuild would be very hard plus Kobe won't be down for it.
ImHeisenberg
Head Coach
Posts: 6,465
And1: 2,323
Joined: Apr 01, 2013
 

Re: What about Nash? 

Post#12 » by ImHeisenberg » Tue Jul 9, 2013 2:49 pm

Who the heck wants the crypt keeper anymore?

Image
DetroitDon15
General Manager
Posts: 8,836
And1: 553
Joined: Jul 23, 2002
         

Re: What about Nash? 

Post#13 » by DetroitDon15 » Tue Jul 9, 2013 3:40 pm

theBigLip wrote:
DetroitDon15 wrote:
Laimbeer wrote:
Whoa, I don't think even the Lakers would expect Monroe for Nash at this point. Great player in his day, but he's closer to middle-of-the pack than elite now.


I think the Pistons have to move Monroe now but Nash isn't the guy.


Pistons don't have to move Monroe. That would be a big mistake.


I don't see Smith being his best at SF and if a team would be willing to part with a young rising star at PG. Detroit moves him. Look what Paul did for the Clips, Irving for the Cavs, and Lillard for the Blazers. IMHO, Point Guard is the most important spot in the league.
User avatar
Snakebites
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 51,069
And1: 18,146
Joined: Jul 14, 2002
Location: Looking not-so-happily deranged
   

Re: What about Nash? 

Post#14 » by Snakebites » Tue Jul 9, 2013 3:41 pm

^Irving is a great player, but what exactly has he done for the Cavs?

They've still had top 4 lottery positions in each of his seasons.

But yeah, I think its fairly academic that an upgrade at point is a must, and I still don't think Knight is that guy.
User avatar
mamadontcry
Senior
Posts: 647
And1: 342
Joined: Nov 11, 2012
Location: downunder

Re: What about Nash? 

Post#15 » by mamadontcry » Tue Jul 9, 2013 3:43 pm

Gigi Datome is a Detroit Pistons player
#Phil The Master

Return to Detroit Pistons