ImageImageImageImageImage

Does moving Lawrie to 2B pave the way for a move for a 3B??

Moderator: JaysRule15

User avatar
scobes
Veteran
Posts: 2,659
And1: 32
Joined: Jun 20, 2002
Location: Canada

Re: Does moving Lawrie to 2B pave the way for a move for a 3 

Post#61 » by scobes » Thu Jul 11, 2013 3:42 pm

Wouldn't you move Edwin to 3rd, leave Raja in LF and move Melky to DH?
Follow me on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/MattScobel
galacticos2
Banned User
Posts: 619
And1: 71
Joined: May 29, 2013

Re: Does moving Lawrie to 2B pave the way for a move for a 3 

Post#62 » by galacticos2 » Thu Jul 11, 2013 3:45 pm

scobes wrote:Wouldn't you move Edwin to 3rd, leave Raja in LF and move Melky to DH?


Edwin is horrible at 3B.
User avatar
MikeM
General Manager
Posts: 9,046
And1: 9,897
Joined: Aug 10, 2006

Re: Does moving Lawrie to 2B pave the way for a move for a 3 

Post#63 » by MikeM » Thu Jul 11, 2013 3:59 pm

Did people really think Lawrie would be GG caliber at 3B?

There were questions if Lawrie could even play 3B at all. I say give the kid a shot at 2B because he's obviously very athletic. If you look around the league, there are way way worse athletes and arms at 2B.

It's possible he lacks the agility, hip turn but I wouldn't mind trying.

I don't care what scouts said about him at 2B in the minors because obviously everyone was wrong about him at 3B.
Salukie
Banned User
Posts: 128
And1: 3
Joined: Jul 11, 2013

Re: Does moving Lawrie to 2B pave the way for a move for a 3 

Post#64 » by Salukie » Thu Jul 11, 2013 5:39 pm

I believe Lawrie will succeed at either second or third base. Productive hitters at second are much harder to find than productive third basemen. Lawrie spent his first years in the minors playing second base. The Brewers were thinking of switching him to third, not because he was a bad second baseman, but rather, because they wanted him to arrive to the MLB level as soon as possible and they already had a quality second basemen named Weeks(or at least at that time, Weeks was considered a quality second baseman).

I believe the Jays also factored in the results of watching the Nationals' Rendon make the switch from third to second base this year virtually on the fly and succeeding and believe Lawrie can do the same and have similar success.
dagger
RealGM
Posts: 41,306
And1: 14,333
Joined: Aug 19, 2002
         

Re: Does moving Lawrie to 2B pave the way for a move for a 3 

Post#65 » by dagger » Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:50 am

I wonder if this 2B thing has already gotten the best of Lawrie

He's 0-4 tonight in BUF with four strikeouts. His average in BUF is .182, small sample size, but don't rush him back yet, AA.
2019 will never be forgotten because FLAGS FLY FOREVER
galacticos2
Banned User
Posts: 619
And1: 71
Joined: May 29, 2013

Re: Does moving Lawrie to 2B pave the way for a move for a 3 

Post#66 » by galacticos2 » Fri Jul 12, 2013 2:02 am

dagger wrote:I wonder if this 2B thing has already gotten the best of Lawrie

He's 0-4 tonight in BUF with four strikeouts. His average in BUF is .182, small sample size, but don't rush him back yet, AA.


lol i think he just sucks and needs to get off the redbull. Him and JP clearly have the same hitting philosophy. But hey thats what you get when growing up in the steroid era.
User avatar
Gibby
Rookie
Posts: 1,142
And1: 361
Joined: Jun 06, 2012

Re: Does moving Lawrie to 2B pave the way for a move for a 3 

Post#67 » by Gibby » Fri Jul 12, 2013 3:55 am

MikeM wrote:Did people really think Lawrie would be GG caliber at 3B?

There were questions if Lawrie could even play 3B at all. I say give the kid a shot at 2B because he's obviously very athletic. If you look around the league, there are way way worse athletes and arms at 2B.

It's possible he lacks the agility, hip turn but I wouldn't mind trying.

I don't care what scouts said about him at 2B in the minors because obviously everyone was wrong about him at 3B.


Well he still could be GG caliber at 3b. Off the top of my head Machado and Longoria are the only guys in the AL that'd I take over him fielding wise at 3b
Image
User avatar
jalenrose#5
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,816
And1: 266
Joined: Jun 22, 2004
Location: Flint
         

Re: Does moving Lawrie to 2B pave the way for a move for a 3 

Post#68 » by jalenrose#5 » Fri Jul 12, 2013 8:52 pm

I still don't know why the Jays are trying this...

Izturis is a decent fielder and his bat is coming around. Having him play 2nd until the end of the season sounds ok to me.

Potential Free Agents at 2B include Robinson Cano, Omar Infante, Chase Utley and potentially Ben Zobrist.
As for 3B, only Michael Young and Mark Reynolds really intrigue me.

So why not make a move for an Utley or Young and work throughout the year to sign them to a new contract.

Moving Lawrie is not the answer in my opinion.
Image
galacticos2
Banned User
Posts: 619
And1: 71
Joined: May 29, 2013

Re: Does moving Lawrie to 2B pave the way for a move for a 3 

Post#69 » by galacticos2 » Fri Jul 12, 2013 10:38 pm

^ Young is old and Utley is injury prone. Both would be good as rental players if the Jays were in a winning position. I don't see them making a rental deal. Plus there's no guarentee they would sign after this year anyway. AA's approach has been controllable assets.
User avatar
Schad
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,437
And1: 17,971
Joined: Feb 08, 2006
Location: The Goat Rodeo
     

Re: Does moving Lawrie to 2B pave the way for a move for a 3 

Post#70 » by Schad » Fri Jul 12, 2013 11:28 pm

Lawrie's playing third tonight, for what it's worth.
Image
**** your asterisk.
galacticos2
Banned User
Posts: 619
And1: 71
Joined: May 29, 2013

Re: Does moving Lawrie to 2B pave the way for a move for a 3 

Post#71 » by galacticos2 » Fri Jul 12, 2013 11:57 pm

Schadenfreude wrote:Lawrie's playing third tonight, for what it's worth.


Must have something to do with his 4 strikeout performance. Jesus, AA and management are sure messing with these prospects. They already ended Snider's career. Not to mention the amount of pitchers that have been injured.
dagger
RealGM
Posts: 41,306
And1: 14,333
Joined: Aug 19, 2002
         

Re: Does moving Lawrie to 2B pave the way for a move for a 3 

Post#72 » by dagger » Sat Jul 13, 2013 11:48 am

galacticos2 wrote:
Schadenfreude wrote:Lawrie's playing third tonight, for what it's worth.


Must have something to do with his 4 strikeout performance. Jesus, AA and management are sure messing with these prospects. They already ended Snider's career. Not to mention the amount of pitchers that have been injured.


Part of the problem with submitting Lawrie to an extended 2B trial in Buffalo is that it relegates a perfectly good second baseman and local fan favorite - Jim Negrych - to the bench. Negrych is one of Buffalo's best bats, too. For that matter, Lawrie at 3B puts a better hitter on the bench, too. AA should have sent Lawrie to New Hampshire which is offensively challenged and can use a power bat. Double A pitching is fairly good, some pitchers as we know make the jump from Double A right to the majors, but there is more room to experiment in NH than there is in Buffalo. This is especially true if they decide to option Lawrie once his rehab period expires.
2019 will never be forgotten because FLAGS FLY FOREVER
flatjacket1
Analyst
Posts: 3,237
And1: 66
Joined: Oct 27, 2009

Re: Does moving Lawrie to 2B pave the way for a move for a 3 

Post#73 » by flatjacket1 » Mon Jul 15, 2013 8:48 pm

Gibby wrote:
MikeM wrote:Off the top of my head Machado and Longoria are the only guys in the AL that'd I take over him fielding wise at 3b


Agreed completely. I'd put Machado above Longoria and both above Lawrie as well.
Avp115 wrote:Bautista>>Mike Trout and Kendrick

Return to Toronto Blue Jays