58 wins: would you take over/under?
Moderators: Rich Rane, NyCeEvO
58 wins: would you take over/under?
- Da_Kidd
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,599
- And1: 17
- Joined: Feb 05, 2002
- Location: 2-Time Eastern Conference Champions
-
58 wins: would you take over/under?
Granted everyone's healthy, I'd definitely take the over if we were to follow Kidd's philosophy of sharing the ball. I really think the parts that BK have assembled all fit since all these players do not need ISO ball to be effective and everyone is willing to sacrifice for a title.
Let's get this season started.
Let's get this season started.
Re: 58 wins: would you take over/under?
- serp
- Senior
- Posts: 664
- And1: 57
- Joined: Nov 29, 2012
Re: 58 wins: would you take over/under?
I'm not taking over because that probably means our older players play too many minutes .
Re: 58 wins: would you take over/under?
-
- Nets Forum: Asst. To The RM
- Posts: 39,016
- And1: 11,965
- Joined: Aug 16, 2012
- Location: NYC
-
Re: 58 wins: would you take over/under?
KG, PP, AK can all rest in games and our frontcourt of Brook, Reggie, Mirza, Mason can easily compete and dominate some East teams alone.
I want to go after that 64-18 record and secure a #1 or #2 seed. Rest is understandable but being 4th again would be a waste.
I want to go after that 64-18 record and secure a #1 or #2 seed. Rest is understandable but being 4th again would be a waste.
Re: 58 wins: would you take over/under?
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,752
- And1: 290
- Joined: Oct 27, 2005
Re: 58 wins: would you take over/under?
Over. Regular season in the East will be EASY MODE. Atlantic Division sucks and a lot of teams will be tanking for Wiggins and them. Nets talent, size and shooting will overwhelm most opponents.
Re: 58 wins: would you take over/under?
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,071
- And1: 68
- Joined: Jul 09, 2012
-
Re: 58 wins: would you take over/under?
I wanna say 60 wins on this but I don't want to give myself that type of expectation just because the Nets, in the past, have always failed me. So i'm going to say 55 wins

Re: 58 wins: would you take over/under?
- 3pt_chucker
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,908
- And1: 2,003
- Joined: Apr 23, 2013
- Location: Practicing my 3's
-
Re: 58 wins: would you take over/under?
Over.
Last year the team had so many flaws and still won 49 games. We also lost at least 4-6 games we should've easily won because of poor coaching/play that lead us to blow big leads or digging a deep hole in the 3rdQ.
Almost all of the weaknesses has been addressed, except maybe coaching, but I think our coaching staff has improved even though I didn't like the Kidd appointment.
Defensively on paper we are a better team and offensively we have way more weapons and everyone except Reggie can score and not be a liability. In regards to rebounding, we shouldn't have a problem. With the way KG plays so hard in practice Brook is only going to get better and I really see him stop being the king of boxing out and go aggressively for boards.
The only thing that stops the team from winning this many games is the injury bug. The kind of bug that has taken out 3-5 guys at one time. While this is possible, it is unlikely. With the good bench depth the team has, limiting guys minutes and not having to force guys to play through certain injuries is huge.
I suck at predictions, so I won't make an exact one but I think the Nets will/should reach the 60 win mark.
Last year the team had so many flaws and still won 49 games. We also lost at least 4-6 games we should've easily won because of poor coaching/play that lead us to blow big leads or digging a deep hole in the 3rdQ.
Almost all of the weaknesses has been addressed, except maybe coaching, but I think our coaching staff has improved even though I didn't like the Kidd appointment.
Defensively on paper we are a better team and offensively we have way more weapons and everyone except Reggie can score and not be a liability. In regards to rebounding, we shouldn't have a problem. With the way KG plays so hard in practice Brook is only going to get better and I really see him stop being the king of boxing out and go aggressively for boards.
The only thing that stops the team from winning this many games is the injury bug. The kind of bug that has taken out 3-5 guys at one time. While this is possible, it is unlikely. With the good bench depth the team has, limiting guys minutes and not having to force guys to play through certain injuries is huge.
I suck at predictions, so I won't make an exact one but I think the Nets will/should reach the 60 win mark.
Re: 58 wins: would you take over/under?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 6,461
- And1: 136
- Joined: Feb 27, 2012
Re: 58 wins: would you take over/under?
serp wrote:I'm not taking over because that probably means our older players play too many minutes .
I see a ton of people mentioning things like this and it just seems like such a misguided thought to me.
We won 50 games last year. If pierce and KG both missed 82 games you are still replacing Wallace with Kirilenko and Evans with Blatche. that along with half a dozen teams outright tanking would likely be good enough to get us in the 53 win area. let alone what pierce and KG give you.
We have alot of age, but we also have insane depth. i see no reason why KG/PP cant play 25 mpg over 65-68 games and stilll not win 58-62 games
Re: 58 wins: would you take over/under?
- EGarrett
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,779
- And1: 251
- Joined: May 30, 2003
Re: 58 wins: would you take over/under?
Up until last night I said 59-23 was optimistic but do-able.
Now...?
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vgsuM1Vv_qk[/youtube]

You guys have no idea how excited I am. I never thought this would happen for our franchise.
Now...?
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vgsuM1Vv_qk[/youtube]

You guys have no idea how excited I am. I never thought this would happen for our franchise.

Re: 58 wins: would you take over/under?
- Nondescript
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 833
- And1: 175
- Joined: Jan 27, 2013
-
Re: 58 wins: would you take over/under?
I'm going to say under.
(Don't kill me I just think we will have a couple stumbles along the way)
(Don't kill me I just think we will have a couple stumbles along the way)
Re: 58 wins: would you take over/under?
-
- Junior
- Posts: 436
- And1: 37
- Joined: Jul 07, 2008
- Location: Where ya momma is
Re: 58 wins: would you take over/under?
They should just let KG, Pierce, and Terry rest.... So I say under....
Re: 58 wins: would you take over/under?
- xMADEinDADEx
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,837
- And1: 3,427
- Joined: Jul 06, 2013
- Location: Houston, TX
-
Re: 58 wins: would you take over/under?
55-60 wins IMO.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums mobile app
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums mobile app
Formerly known as G-Menn..
Re: 58 wins: would you take over/under?
- Born_Ready
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,507
- And1: 476
- Joined: May 30, 2011
-
Re: 58 wins: would you take over/under?
In a perfect world with everyone healthy I would take the over. I believe they can transcend the 49 wins they posted last season.
Not to sound too homeristic- but adding PP, KG, AK-47 should at least get them 10-15 more wins- right?
Not to sound too homeristic- but adding PP, KG, AK-47 should at least get them 10-15 more wins- right?
OKC Thunder fan, too.
Re: 58 wins: would you take over/under?
- Rich Rane
- Senior Mod - Nets
- Posts: 36,948
- And1: 15,615
- Joined: Jun 29, 2005
-
Re: 58 wins: would you take over/under?
Anything less than 150 wins next season is a failure.
Re: 58 wins: would you take over/under?
-
- Nets Forum: Asst. To The RM
- Posts: 39,016
- And1: 11,965
- Joined: Aug 16, 2012
- Location: NYC
-
Re: 58 wins: would you take over/under?
Normal rotation:
Deron/Livingston/Taylor
JJ/Terry
Pierce/AK47/Toko
KG/Evans/Mirza
Lopez/Blatche/Plumlee
Without KG & Pierce:
Deron/Livingston/Taylor
JJ/Terry
AK/Toko
Blatche/Evans/Mirza
Lopez/Plumlee
Without KG, Pierce, AK47:
Deron//Taylor
Terry/Livingston
JJ/Toko
Blatche/Evans/Mirza
Lopez/Plumlee
Without Lopez:
Deron/Livingston/Taylor
JJ/Terry
Pierce/AK/Toko
Evans or Blatche/Mirza
KG/Blatche/Plumlee
Without Deron and JJ:
Livingston/Taylor
Pierce/Terry
AK47/Toko
KG/Evans/Mirza
Lopez/Blatche/Plumlee
So, there is really no reason for not reaching 60 wins or more even with injuries or resting games.
Deron/Livingston/Taylor
JJ/Terry
Pierce/AK47/Toko
KG/Evans/Mirza
Lopez/Blatche/Plumlee
Without KG & Pierce:
Deron/Livingston/Taylor
JJ/Terry
AK/Toko
Blatche/Evans/Mirza
Lopez/Plumlee
Without KG, Pierce, AK47:
Deron//Taylor
Terry/Livingston
JJ/Toko
Blatche/Evans/Mirza
Lopez/Plumlee
Without Lopez:
Deron/Livingston/Taylor
JJ/Terry
Pierce/AK/Toko
Evans or Blatche/Mirza
KG/Blatche/Plumlee
Without Deron and JJ:
Livingston/Taylor
Pierce/Terry
AK47/Toko
KG/Evans/Mirza
Lopez/Blatche/Plumlee
So, there is really no reason for not reaching 60 wins or more even with injuries or resting games.
Re: 58 wins: would you take over/under?
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,122
- And1: 3,743
- Joined: Jun 24, 2013
-
Re: 58 wins: would you take over/under?
Under. I think you guys will have a shaky start and finish strong, like a better assembled Lakers last year. Without injuries, I would say 56-58. But I'll stick with 52 for now.
Re: 58 wins: would you take over/under?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 6,461
- And1: 136
- Joined: Feb 27, 2012
Re: 58 wins: would you take over/under?
With heavy injuries - 56
healthy - 63
healthy - 63
Re: 58 wins: would you take over/under?
- M I K E
- Junior
- Posts: 351
- And1: 42
- Joined: Feb 20, 2013
- Location: PARTS UNKNOWN
Re: 58 wins: would you take over/under?
If Deron gets hit by a bus right before the season starts, I will take under.
Question: Can AK play both SF and PF spots ?
Question: Can AK play both SF and PF spots ?
Re: 58 wins: would you take over/under?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 6,461
- And1: 136
- Joined: Feb 27, 2012
Re: 58 wins: would you take over/under?
M I K E wrote:
Question: Can AK play both SF and PF spots ?
he can and has. he played a little over 9 mpg at PF last season
Re: 58 wins: would you take over/under?
- Hello Brooklyn
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,515
- And1: 13,309
- Joined: Dec 24, 2012
-
Re: 58 wins: would you take over/under?
Lets PLEASE not get ahead of ourselves. Im predicting 55 wins with everyone healthy.
Re: 58 wins: would you take over/under?
- M I K E
- Junior
- Posts: 351
- And1: 42
- Joined: Feb 20, 2013
- Location: PARTS UNKNOWN
Re: 58 wins: would you take over/under?
he can and has. he played a little over 9 mpg at PF last season
So AK will be our backup SF/PF ?
Man we will be loaded...Even if Lopez goes down we should be able to hold up the front court with a combination of Garnett, Blatche, AK-47, Evans, Teletovic and Plumlee...I have a feeling Plumlee will see more minutes this year than expected.