old rem wrote:TaylorMonkey wrote:CelticsBizniss wrote:Have Golden State and Detroit not discussed Monroe? Barnes for Monroe straight up doesnt make tons of sense for Detroit, but has this come up or no?
Doesn't make sense for us either. We already have David Lee, and Monroe's big contract is coming up soon.
I think it's not something EITHER team does now, but,depending on how other things are going...both can have interest at the Deadline or in a year. If GSW figures Bogut is NOT the C for the next few years or is injured too often to be affordable...this becomes a top option to look at. If the Pistons see that Monroe and Drummond ought to play C and Josh is best at PF...then Barnes is a tempting SF to get.
The Dynamic of Curry + Klay as sharpshooters from 3, means GSW won't want to deal Klay.. Also...Iggy has been a bit better at SF than SG IMO.
This is what I was kind of thinking
Iggy's gonna do better at the three in the system you guys run, and probably going to start
So if your going to run Curry-Klay-Iggy-Lee-Bogut. As much as some people mention Barnes being able to play the four, I was wondering if it'd be in you guys' best interest to look for a more versatile 6th man or something. Barnes and Monroe being involved in a deal makes sense. Detroits kinda doing this "go for it" thing, but maybe involving a third team or something in a trade to the tune of the rumored Pierce for Barnes offer to give Detroit an option there.
I've heard random deals combining Barnes and Lee, but the overall depth would take a hit there even if you got a Lamarcus Aldridge back.
Curry-Klay-Iggy-Lee-Bogut with Monroe being off the bench would be quite interesting.




















