Rate My OKC GMAT

Moderators: Dadouv47, retrobro90

What Grade Would You Give This Team?

A
1
20%
B
1
20%
C
1
20%
D
1
20%
F
1
20%
 
Total votes: 5

User avatar
NBADraft2003
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,494
And1: 10,123
Joined: Jul 13, 2012
Location: #HEATNation
       

Rate My OKC GMAT 

Post#1 » by NBADraft2003 » Sat Sep 14, 2013 4:02 am

Grade this team and offer suggestions on what I should do, trying to do what should be done in OKC.

*DEPTH CHART:
PG: Rajon Rondo...Isiah Thomas...Derek Fisher
SG: Thabo Sefolosha...Richard Hamilton...Dahntay Jones
SF: Kevin Durant...Trevor Ariza...Travis Outlaw
PF: Serge Ibaka...Luis Scola...Nick Collison...Perry Jones
C: Spencer Hawes...Hasheem Thabeet

*TOTAL SALARY=$75,285,023
wizkid27
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 2,636
And1: 166
Joined: Jun 21, 2004
Location: Indianapolis
   

Re: Rate My OKC GMAT 

Post#2 » by wizkid27 » Sat Sep 14, 2013 2:09 pm

I'd say trade Rondo for Westbrook :)

Ultimately what our team needs currently is a player that can create shots for himself coming off of the bench... I don't feel like your changes really address that. Also, with Rondo instead of Westbrook Durant is really the only player on the team that can score at an elite level, that's pretty bad for a championship hopeful.
User avatar
NaturalThunder
General Manager
Posts: 8,491
And1: 3,907
Joined: Jun 13, 2012
     

Re: Rate My OKC GMAT 

Post#3 » by NaturalThunder » Sun Sep 15, 2013 5:08 am

Yeah, I don't know why so many people think we should trade Westbrook for a pass first PG so Durant can get more shots and score more. Westbrook's value to this team get's really underrated. We need his attacking/scoring style of PG since the rest of our offensive options outside of Durant are really limited. So someone like Rondo, who's only scoring 12-15 a game and has a broken jumper is supposed to be a better fit than Russ because he'll get Durant more shots?

I'm not real sure what a GMAT is, and how you got all the other players, but I like Hawes starting at C, and I really like the bench.
Said in a thread about which point guards would make OKC better if they replaced Westbrook:
Coxy wrote:I think with a PG like George Hill, they'd be better than current.
Devilanche
General Manager
Posts: 7,744
And1: 2,442
Joined: Dec 22, 2010

Re: Rate My OKC GMAT 

Post#4 » by Devilanche » Sun Sep 15, 2013 2:26 pm

NaturalThunder wrote:
I'm not real sure what a GMAT is, and how you got all the other players, but I like Hawes starting at C, and I really like the bench.

Trading game with other realgm user. You start with a team roster and it's cap situation and draft+make trades.

basically rebuild your team with any type of trades you want. It probably cost him westbrook to get the bench + dump Perkins.
MoneyTalks41890 wrote:No I’m myopic and shortsighted and I want my pile of draft picks.


meekrab wrote:Nothing Jerry Rein$dorf loves more than a visit from Cash Considerations.
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: Rate My OKC GMAT 

Post#5 » by bondom34 » Sun Sep 15, 2013 7:30 pm

Yeah, I'm assuming that's why no Perk and Russ. Rondo's solid though if that's the product of dumping Perkins, the remaining roster is solid, Hawes would be somewhat of an offensive presence, so I'd say B (and I'd consider the current roster a B due to Perkins, so very good!).
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
sonictecture
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 12,617
And1: 1,110
Joined: May 26, 2002

Re: Rate My OKC GMAT 

Post#6 » by sonictecture » Sun Sep 15, 2013 10:49 pm

Wow.

So what should be done is a down grade in talent at point guard, while also taking a risk on an injured player who doesn't have a return date and taking the bench from a collection of young players to a menagerie of the NBA's most unwanted veterans. Targeting and acquiring Travis Outlaw, Richard Hamilton, Dahntay Jones, Trevor Ariza and Isiah Thomas, while keeping Derek Fisher to lead them is just an amazing feat. The ability to acquire Scola so that Collison moves out the rotation is an underrated bad move.

You managed to take one of the youngest rosters with emerging talent at every position with a top 5 rated offensive and defense and make us a middle of the pack team. And to top it all off you managed to ensure we pay the luxury tax for the privilege. Any time you have the opportunity to pay the luxury tax for a bunch of dead weight contracts you have to do it, right?

I'm not a fan of the GMAT team.
MvPderozan
Banned User
Posts: 485
And1: 227
Joined: Dec 11, 2011

Re: Rate My OKC GMAT 

Post#7 » by MvPderozan » Mon Sep 16, 2013 1:16 am

If we had kept Harden, Rondo would of been a better fit. Now that we lost Harden, Westbrook is a better fit.
wizkid27
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 2,636
And1: 166
Joined: Jun 21, 2004
Location: Indianapolis
   

Re: Rate My OKC GMAT 

Post#8 » by wizkid27 » Mon Sep 16, 2013 1:24 am

sonictecture said everything I needed to say :)
sonictecture
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 12,617
And1: 1,110
Joined: May 26, 2002

Re: Rate My OKC GMAT 

Post#9 » by sonictecture » Mon Sep 16, 2013 3:49 pm

MvPderozan wrote:If we had kept Harden, Rondo would of been a better fit. Now that we lost Harden, Westbrook is a better fit.

You still have the issue that both players are better with the ball in their hands and their is only one ball. If Harden is running the offense what does Rondo do? Spot up? If Rondo has the ball then do you turn Harden into Kevin Martin? What's the point of that?

Both Rondo and Harden make the limited role players a little better, but I wonder if that is a necessary requirement for winning.
User avatar
NBADraft2003
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,494
And1: 10,123
Joined: Jul 13, 2012
Location: #HEATNation
       

Re: Rate My OKC GMAT 

Post#10 » by NBADraft2003 » Wed Sep 18, 2013 4:37 am

NaturalThunder wrote:Yeah, I don't know why so many people think we should trade Westbrook for a pass first PG so Durant can get more shots and score more. Westbrook's value to this team get's really underrated. We need his attacking/scoring style of PG since the rest of our offensive options outside of Durant are really limited. So someone like Rondo, who's only scoring 12-15 a game and has a broken jumper is supposed to be a better fit than Russ because he'll get Durant more shots?

I'm not real sure what a GMAT is, and how you got all the other players, but I like Hawes starting at C, and I really like the bench.

Lol, I hate myself for trading Russell and i'm desperately trying to get him back. The roster looks like this as of now:
PG: Tony Parker...Nate Robinson...Isiah Thomas
SG: Thabo Sefolosha...Richard Hamilton...Dahntay Jones
SF: Kevin Durant...Travis Outlaw...
PF: Serge Ibaka...Darrell Arthur...Udonis Haslem...Perry Jones
C: Nene...Chris Andersen...Tyrus Thomas
User avatar
NBADraft2003
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,494
And1: 10,123
Joined: Jul 13, 2012
Location: #HEATNation
       

Re: Rate My OKC GMAT 

Post#11 » by NBADraft2003 » Wed Sep 18, 2013 4:40 am

NaturalThunder wrote:Yeah, I don't know why so many people think we should trade Westbrook for a pass first PG so Durant can get more shots and score more. Westbrook's value to this team get's really underrated. We need his attacking/scoring style of PG since the rest of our offensive options outside of Durant are really limited. So someone like Rondo, who's only scoring 12-15 a game and has a broken jumper is supposed to be a better fit than Russ because he'll get Durant more shots?

I'm not real sure what a GMAT is, and how you got all the other players, but I like Hawes starting at C, and I really like the bench.

A GMAT means General Manage A Team. It's in the Trades & Transactions Sub-Forum, you should try it out next game or I might rune one off the 85-86 season. I got all the others through trades and signings. We use MLEs, TPEs, everything a GM does.
User avatar
HornetJail
RealGM
Posts: 46,419
And1: 14,164
Joined: Feb 05, 2012
     

Re: Rate My OKC GMAT 

Post#12 » by HornetJail » Wed Sep 25, 2013 5:21 am

The results are in!!!!

Spoiler:
Image
We really have no **** idea. :lol:
investigate Adam Silver
wizkid27
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 2,636
And1: 166
Joined: Jun 21, 2004
Location: Indianapolis
   

Re: Rate My OKC GMAT 

Post#13 » by wizkid27 » Thu Sep 26, 2013 12:55 pm

Biz Gilwalker wrote:The results are in!!!!

Spoiler:
Image
We really have no **** idea. :lol:

Yeah, I just saw there was one vote for every grade level, that's gotta be a first..

Return to Oklahoma City Thunder