ImageImage

Redskins-Packers Postgame Thread

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 107,864
And1: 42,158
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: Redskins-Packers Postgame Thread 

Post#41 » by ReasonablySober » Mon Sep 16, 2013 6:25 pm

I don't know that they're conservative so much as they put a big point of emphasis on practicing the Thursday before a game. It all comes down to whether or not they go or if they're limited significantly a couple days from now.
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,763
And1: 6,963
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Re: Redskins-Packers Postgame Thread 

Post#42 » by LUKE23 » Mon Sep 16, 2013 6:28 pm

We definitely are conservative with injuries, especially the last few years since we've had so many and fear them lingering into the later portions of the year if not dealt with correctly. Obviously, that and practicing go hand in hand, but there is zero chance Burnett plays vs. Cincy unless the hammy is completely and totally gone with a bye coming. It's one week of rest before playing vs. three weeks of rest. It's also week 3.
User avatar
chuckleslove
RealGM
Posts: 18,566
And1: 1,128
Joined: Nov 17, 2009
Location: In an RV down by the river
Contact:
     

Re: Redskins-Packers Postgame Thread 

Post#43 » by chuckleslove » Mon Sep 16, 2013 6:34 pm

Man those rankings from King are embarrassing.
I'm dealing with cancer, it sucks, can follow along for updates if that's your thing: Chuck's cancer Go Fund Me page
jakecronus8
RealGM
Posts: 16,726
And1: 8,135
Joined: Feb 06, 2006
     

Re: Redskins-Packers Postgame Thread 

Post#44 » by jakecronus8 » Mon Sep 16, 2013 7:11 pm

Packers at #11?

Dafuq did I just read?
Do it for Chuck
User avatar
chuckleslove
RealGM
Posts: 18,566
And1: 1,128
Joined: Nov 17, 2009
Location: In an RV down by the river
Contact:
     

Re: Redskins-Packers Postgame Thread 

Post#45 » by chuckleslove » Mon Sep 16, 2013 7:16 pm

jakecronus8 wrote:Packers at #11?

Dafuq did I just read?



12!
I'm dealing with cancer, it sucks, can follow along for updates if that's your thing: Chuck's cancer Go Fund Me page
User avatar
glenn
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,015
And1: 4,153
Joined: Oct 05, 2010
Location: Craft Sausages

Re: Redskins-Packers Postgame Thread 

Post#46 » by glenn » Mon Sep 16, 2013 7:24 pm

I haven't read King for a couple of years, but didn't he used to know what he was talking about? Those are some jacked up rankings.
:reporter:
User avatar
Sky High
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,818
And1: 280
Joined: Aug 03, 2009
Location: MKE
     

Re: Redskins-Packers Postgame Thread 

Post#47 » by Sky High » Mon Sep 16, 2013 7:33 pm

He's got Miami in the top 5, I believe. I stopped there.
User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 35,595
And1: 4,452
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

Re: Redskins-Packers Postgame Thread 

Post#48 » by Kerb Hohl » Mon Sep 16, 2013 7:47 pm

San Francisco can remain among the top after getting throttled by a top foe on the road. Green Bay isn't even considered among the top because they lost (almost won) on the road against a top foe.

Reasoning for having Chicago high after two miracle wins at home is that they can win an "imperfect division."

Nice work.
Ayt
RealGM
Posts: 59,152
And1: 15,031
Joined: Jun 27, 2005

Re: Redskins-Packers Postgame Thread 

Post#49 » by Ayt » Mon Sep 16, 2013 7:58 pm

Packers/Miami on a neutral field? I'm very comfortable going with Miami.
User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 35,595
And1: 4,452
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

Re: Redskins-Packers Postgame Thread 

Post#50 » by Kerb Hohl » Mon Sep 16, 2013 8:09 pm

They have a studly pass defense*, says Peter King.

*Note: One of the quarterbacks was Brandon Weeden.
WiscSports1
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,274
And1: 501
Joined: Feb 07, 2012
     

Re: Redskins-Packers Postgame Thread 

Post#51 » by WiscSports1 » Mon Sep 16, 2013 8:30 pm

ReasonablySober wrote:
LUKE23 wrote:That isn't how we operate though, and in this case, given how early it is in the season, I'd probably agree with them. I expect them all to sit.


How exactly do they operate? You aren't suggesting that the only way a guy plays on Sunday is if he's 100%, right?


Funny, I was listening to the postgame show yesterday and they were talking about keeping Burnett out next week. (McCarren said he was real close this week) Everyone said they should hold them out til after the bye, but Larry was adamant that if cleared, he will play. "You only get 16 games"
User avatar
Ill-yasova
RealGM
Posts: 13,364
And1: 2,562
Joined: Jul 13, 2006

Re: Redskins-Packers Postgame Thread 

Post#52 » by Ill-yasova » Mon Sep 16, 2013 10:03 pm

chuckleslove wrote:Man those rankings from King are embarrassing.

That's why you have to read Fun with PK every week at KSK
http://kissingsuzykolber.uproxx.com/2013/09/peter-king-says-johnny-manziel-is-just-like-tim-tebow-except-when-he-isnt.html
Sent from my SCH-R970 using RealGM Forums mobile app
Newz
Banned User
Posts: 42,327
And1: 2,551
Joined: Dec 05, 2005

Re: Redskins-Packers Postgame Thread 

Post#53 » by Newz » Mon Sep 16, 2013 10:13 pm

Ill-yasova wrote:
chuckleslove wrote:Man those rankings from King are embarrassing.

That's why you have to read Fun with PK every week at KSK
http://kissingsuzykolber.uproxx.com/2013/09/peter-king-says-johnny-manziel-is-just-like-tim-tebow-except-when-he-isnt.html
Sent from my SCH-R970 using RealGM Forums mobile app


:rofl:
User avatar
glenn
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,015
And1: 4,153
Joined: Oct 05, 2010
Location: Craft Sausages

Re: Redskins-Packers Postgame Thread 

Post#54 » by glenn » Mon Sep 16, 2013 10:22 pm

Ill-yasova wrote:
chuckleslove wrote:Man those rankings from King are embarrassing.

That's why you have to read Fun with PK every week at KSK
http://kissingsuzykolber.uproxx.com/2013/09/peter-king-says-johnny-manziel-is-just-like-tim-tebow-except-when-he-isnt.html
Sent from my SCH-R970 using RealGM Forums mobile app


I was a fan of this part:


"2. Seattle (2-0). Thought I’d never see a division rivalry as physical as Baltimore-Pittsburgh over the last five to seven years. Seahawks and Niners: close.

It’s getting there. PK is gonna need to see just a little more physicality, though. Don’t be afraid to go out and physical it up. If a guy is in your path, you just outphysical him, unless it’s too loud to hear the physicaling."
:reporter:
User avatar
Ill-yasova
RealGM
Posts: 13,364
And1: 2,562
Joined: Jul 13, 2006

Re: Redskins-Packers Postgame Thread 

Post#55 » by Ill-yasova » Tue Sep 17, 2013 12:30 am

I may be damning Manziel with faint praise here, but stylistically as a college player, he has some things in common with Tim Tebow.

Oh?

Manziel can make people miss more, and he’s by any measure more accurate.

Sooooooo not at all like Tebow?

But there is one thing they definitely don’t have in common:

Unlike all the other things they don’t have in common.

Tebow’s second game against ‘Bama, in the 2009 SEC title game, was mediocre; Manziel’s second game against Alabama, after the Tide worked all offseason to be ready to stop him, was a success—despite two turnovers

So he’s a better prospect than Tebow, who was inexplicably taken in the first round. Yeah, this Johnny Whatshisface won’t be on the radar of many GMs.



Read more: http://kissingsuzykolber.uproxx.com/201 ... z2f6aO2MRC
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,787
And1: 27,356
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Redskins-Packers Postgame Thread 

Post#56 » by trwi7 » Tue Sep 17, 2013 9:56 am

This is like the FireJoeMorgan.com for football.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.

Return to Green Bay Packers