hands11 wrote:Good players produce what they produce and tend to follow the normal development and fade curves but fit does also matters which goes to the total roster and how the coach combines them. And there are always exceptions so there is an x factor.
Its is a team. Its about production, team chemistry and efficiency.
Not just good players, all kinds of players "produce what they produce and tend to follow the normal development and fade curves" -- tho of course you are right that there are exceptions. Very very few however. The rest of what's above is just blah blah. If players produce what they produce -- independent of the system and their teammates, and that is what the data shows -- then if you assemble players who produce more your team produces more. If your team produces more it wins more; it is impossible for that not to be true.
hands11 wrote:Calling it addition is way over simplifying things.
Simplifying, yes -- and that is what you want to do! Over-simplifying, no. At what point is acquiring the best players you can anything but the very best thing to do?
hands11 wrote:...lots of unknown variables.
No. I can only think of one -- injury.
hands11 wrote:So stats are useful for some things, but nothing replaces the eye test...
There is no such thing as "the eye test." Period.
hands11 wrote:...you add a PP, KG, Dirk or Pau even when they are on the downside.
BS, pure and simple. No quicker way into the toilet than that.
hands11 wrote:...Nene, AH and Okafor all healthy, that's ...a decent support system for Wall, Beal and other younger players who have skills to develop.
This irks me -- Beal is lighting it up. Wall is playing horribly. Whatever do those other guys have to do with either fact?
hands11 wrote:So if you could trade Nene and Trevor A in a package for Pau or Dirk, I would do it. Both are upgrades when it goes to be winners. Then you resign Okafor and AH.
...and down the toilet you go. Weren't you the guy who was sure how much better we'd be w/ Shawn Livingston?