Hopper15 wrote:Not denying that you cheated. Good on you.
how come ?
A) I m the commish ? no
B) I work in yahoo and manipulated our league ? no
C) you are an idiot that lost and are still crying over it ?

you lost but nice try boy

Moderators: floppymoose, Curtis Lemansky, sly
Hopper15 wrote:Not denying that you cheated. Good on you.





sabonis wrote:I love how fran offers certain players in trades like as if they present some kind of value, then he goes ahead and drops that player the next day. He just offered me Battier 2 days ago, and of course now he's gone

jazzfan1971 wrote:floppymoose wrote:jazzfan, i've got a new bet for you this season, winner get's rights to swap draft picks next season in FFL:
Nets finish with a top2 record in the regular season: you win
else: i win
i'll give you ties on the record if multiple teams are tied for 2nd and the nets are one of them.
done.

writersblock wrote:2 blocks and 1 steal away from winning. Sheesh.
theman wrote:writersblock wrote:2 blocks and 1 steal away from winning. Sheesh.
sabonis wrote:Got a question for you guys:
Do you think Deron Williams for Dalembert & Meeks is veto worthy in a 12 team league? Since Meeks will be garbage in 10 days, I think it is.
writersblock wrote:sabonis wrote:Got a question for you guys:
Do you think Deron Williams for Dalembert & Meeks is veto worthy in a 12 team league? Since Meeks will be garbage in 10 days, I think it is.
Uh, yeah, that's total collusion.
hamncheese wrote:One thing I will never do is quote someone and place it in my signature to make them look bad.
hamncheese wrote:writersblock wrote:sabonis wrote:Got a question for you guys:
Do you think Deron Williams for Dalembert & Meeks is veto worthy in a 12 team league? Since Meeks will be garbage in 10 days, I think it is.
Uh, yeah, that's total collusion.
It's veto worthy because it's not equal value (long term) but I don't think you can conclude it's total collusion. It could be a panic move on the DWill owner not thinking that Williams will be right this season. And there's no guarantee that Kobe will not suffer a setback. In a 12-team league Meeks is definitely a short term starter, so when you look at DWill for Dally, it's one-sided, also adding to it is Dally's history of inconsistency and bone-headedness.
theman wrote:hamncheese wrote:writersblock wrote:
Uh, yeah, that's total collusion.
It's veto worthy because it's not equal value (long term) but I don't think you can conclude it's total collusion. It could be a panic move on the DWill owner not thinking that Williams will be right this season. And there's no guarantee that Kobe will not suffer a setback. In a 12-team league Meeks is definitely a short term starter, so when you look at DWill for Dally, it's one-sided, also adding to it is Dally's history of inconsistency and bone-headedness.
It is a terrible trade but looking a this year's stats it is not veto worth.
Deron is ranked 219 averaging a little over 9 points per game and less than one steal. His ranking have been getting worse and now he is injured. Dalembert has been his usual suprisingly good self. Meeks is waiver foder. If the guy is strong at point and weak at center i can see it. I wouldn't do it, but I can see it.
Conley for Pierce + Alec Burks

sabonis wrote:thanks for the response guys but the trade went through.
on another note: Fraan, is this trade offer seriuous ??????Conley for Pierce + Alec Burks
hamncheese wrote:One thing I will never do is quote someone and place it in my signature to make them look bad.
Return to Fantasy Basketball Leagues