ImageImageImageImageImage

Official Trade Thread - Part XXV

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

ozthegandp
Sophomore
Posts: 160
And1: 20
Joined: Nov 18, 2013

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1061 » by ozthegandp » Wed Dec 18, 2013 5:40 pm

ozthegandp wrote:how bout maynor and seraphin for ridnour. the bucks are trying to develop their young guys and tank so ridnour isnt getting any playing time.


Sent from my SPH-D710VMUB using RealGM Forums mobile app


oh and again the wizards arent mentioned as one of the teams interested despite this being an obvious area of need


Sent from my SPH-D710VMUB using RealGM Forums mobile app
User avatar
Rafael122
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 20,818
And1: 3,548
Joined: Oct 11, 2004
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1062 » by Rafael122 » Wed Dec 18, 2013 5:43 pm

No one here knew that the Wizards were trying to get Asik. Just because the team isn't being mentioned in trade rumors doesn't mean EG isn't being active. For all we know the Wiz could be the wild card team in the WT article.
Bickerstaff: who's up for kickball?!!
Ed Wood: Only if it's the no-pants variety.
ozthegandp
Sophomore
Posts: 160
And1: 20
Joined: Nov 18, 2013

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1063 » by ozthegandp » Wed Dec 18, 2013 5:49 pm

doubtful. with the asking prices that some of these teams are setting , the wiz really dont have the assets to make a competitive offer. we have to go for the lesser players on the market or nothing.

Sent from my SPH-D710VMUB using RealGM Forums mobile app
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,149
And1: 7,912
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1064 » by Dat2U » Wed Dec 18, 2013 5:51 pm

Dark Faze wrote:My only concern with Faried is how much better is he than Booker really? Stats seem similar. Faried is clearly better, but I wonder how much of that is him just being healthier and getting more development on a team that didn't have an option at PF.

In either case I wouldn't trade Porter for him and I'd still be shocked if we extended Ariza at this point. Yes, he's performing better this year, but his role is the same and he was still hitting the long ball at a nice clip last year. I don't understand why we'd draft Porter if we thought extending both Webb and Trevor were real possibilities.

It would have made more sense to move Porter during the draft while his value was at its highest or maybe traded down to get Adams and or Len, maybe even going with Noel.


Well lets see... Booker is 2 years older but Faried has higher career PER, TS%, eFG%, ORB%, TRB%, USG%, ORtg, WS & WS48. Also the majority of Booker's minutes have come against backups while Faried minutes have mostly come against starters

Other than that their similar. :wink:

Stats from 2011-14

Code: Select all

Player   PER     TS%   DRB%   TRB%  AST%  BLK%   TOV%   USG%  ORtg  DRtg    WS  WS/48
Booker   15.0   .548   18.1   14.4   6.0   2.4   12.0   14.8   112   105   8.7   .119
Faried   19.6   .581   22.9   18.7   5.3   3.0   12.1   18.1   117   102  14.4   .179
ozthegandp
Sophomore
Posts: 160
And1: 20
Joined: Nov 18, 2013

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1065 » by ozthegandp » Wed Dec 18, 2013 5:56 pm

ozthegandp wrote:how bout maynor and seraphin for ridnour. the bucks are trying to develop their young guys and tank so ridnour isnt getting any playing time.

Sent from my SPH-D710VMUB using RealGM Forums mobile app


and personally i think ridnour would be perfect for our bench. we've been saying we need a scoring guard but i think ridnour will have the same effect wall did when he came back from injury last yr. he can actually run an offense and maximize Webster Otto and harrington's skills getting them shots in their spots

Sent from my SPH-D710VMUB using RealGM Forums mobile app
User avatar
Nivek
Head Coach
Posts: 7,406
And1: 959
Joined: Sep 29, 2010
Contact:
         

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1066 » by Nivek » Wed Dec 18, 2013 6:01 pm

jivelikenice wrote:So that would leave us with a lineup going forward of....
Wall/?
Beal/Webster/Rice
Ariza/Webster
Faried/ Nene
Gortat/Nene

Depending on what they could do to fill the combo guard hole, what kind of upside does that team have?


I think that's a good team -- provided the GM could add depth. Which he oughta be able to do using the MLE, the BAE and draft picks (after they pay Phoenix the 2014 1st for Gortat). The cap on how good would likely come down to whether Wall and Beal could develop into true stars before Nene and Gortat got too old.
"A lot of what we call talent is the desire to practice."
-- Malcolm Gladwell

Check out my blog about the Wizards, movies, writing, music, TV, sports, and whatever else comes to mind.
User avatar
Nivek
Head Coach
Posts: 7,406
And1: 959
Joined: Sep 29, 2010
Contact:
         

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1067 » by Nivek » Wed Dec 18, 2013 6:05 pm

Dat2U wrote:
Dark Faze wrote:My only concern with Faried is how much better is he than Booker really? Stats seem similar. Faried is clearly better, but I wonder how much of that is him just being healthier and getting more development on a team that didn't have an option at PF.

In either case I wouldn't trade Porter for him and I'd still be shocked if we extended Ariza at this point. Yes, he's performing better this year, but his role is the same and he was still hitting the long ball at a nice clip last year. I don't understand why we'd draft Porter if we thought extending both Webb and Trevor were real possibilities.

It would have made more sense to move Porter during the draft while his value was at its highest or maybe traded down to get Adams and or Len, maybe even going with Noel.


Well lets see... Booker is 2 years older but Faried has higher career PER, TS%, eFG%, ORB%, TRB%, USG%, ORtg, WS & WS48. Also the majority of Booker's minutes have come against backups while Faried minutes have mostly come against starters

Other than that their similar. :wink:

Stats from 2011-14

Code: Select all

Player   PER     TS%   DRB%   TRB%  AST%  BLK%   TOV%   USG%  ORtg  DRtg    WS  WS/48
Booker   15.0   .548   18.1   14.4   6.0   2.4   12.0   14.8   112   105   8.7   .119
Faried   19.6   .581   22.9   18.7   5.3   3.0   12.1   18.1   117   102  14.4   .179


Booker's PPA (my overall productivity stat -- pace adjusted, accounts for defense, includes a "degree of difficulty" factor) so far this season: 118. Faried: 179. Average is 100, higher is better.
"A lot of what we call talent is the desire to practice."
-- Malcolm Gladwell

Check out my blog about the Wizards, movies, writing, music, TV, sports, and whatever else comes to mind.
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 34,808
And1: 20,372
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1068 » by dckingsfan » Wed Dec 18, 2013 6:10 pm

ozthegandp wrote:
ozthegandp wrote:how bout maynor and seraphin for ridnour. the bucks are trying to develop their young guys and tank so ridnour isnt getting any playing time.


Sent from my SPH-D710VMUB using RealGM Forums mobile app


oh and again the wizards arent mentioned as one of the teams interested despite this being an obvious area of need


Sent from my SPH-D710VMUB using RealGM Forums mobile app


That would be a very nice trade.
jivelikenice
Analyst
Posts: 3,074
And1: 145
Joined: Jul 15, 2005

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1069 » by jivelikenice » Wed Dec 18, 2013 6:24 pm

Unless they are fascinated by Seraphin and think they can develop him, there's no reason for Milwaukee to take on Maynor's 2nd yr player option.
ozthegandp
Sophomore
Posts: 160
And1: 20
Joined: Nov 18, 2013

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1070 » by ozthegandp » Wed Dec 18, 2013 6:30 pm

jivelikenice wrote:Unless they are fascinated by Seraphin and think they can develop him, there's no reason for Milwaukee to take on Maynor's 2nd yr player option.


i know i just stuck him in because i hate him

Sent from my SPH-D710VMUB using RealGM Forums mobile app
ozthegandp
Sophomore
Posts: 160
And1: 20
Joined: Nov 18, 2013

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1071 » by ozthegandp » Wed Dec 18, 2013 6:31 pm

we should definately at least try to get ridnour though.

Sent from my SPH-D710VMUB using RealGM Forums mobile app
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1072 » by Ruzious » Wed Dec 18, 2013 7:35 pm

ozthegandp wrote:we should definately at least try to get ridnour though.

Sent from my SPH-D710VMUB using RealGM Forums mobile app

You know how guards often lose a whole step in their early 30's and really can't play effectively anymore - except for maybe a game here or there? That's what happened to Luke. He's basically done at 32.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
User avatar
GeeWiz
Sophomore
Posts: 205
And1: 15
Joined: Nov 28, 2013

 

Post#1073 » by GeeWiz » Wed Dec 18, 2013 7:39 pm

Our team clearly isn't there yet. Were two good, young bigs away from being in GREAT position for the future.

If we could pull a trade for Sanders, whose stock should be lowered with his big contract and recent shenanigans. Maybe Milwaukee commits to Henson as the Center of the future, with Atentekounpo (spelling) at PF, as he is not done growing.

A Larry Sanders-Greg Monroe frountcourt would be a dream. But I think one of the two are obtainable, whether it be offering Monroe a big contract or offering Porter and other assets for Sanders.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
User avatar
TGW
RealGM
Posts: 13,346
And1: 6,720
Joined: Oct 22, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1074 » by TGW » Wed Dec 18, 2013 8:15 pm

I've soured on Monroe—defensively he is terrible, and he's somewhat of a tweener. He'd be a clear upgrade from what we have, but again he's not as good as we make him out to be.
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.
LyricalRico
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 30,563
And1: 853
Joined: May 23, 2002
Location: Back into the fray!
Contact:
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1075 » by LyricalRico » Wed Dec 18, 2013 9:08 pm

Any way we can insert ourselves into the rumored HOU/BOS deal? Maybe take back Courtney Lee and a second while giving up Maynor? Helps our SG depth and doesn't hurt our cap if we assume Gortat will be resigned.
ozthegandp
Sophomore
Posts: 160
And1: 20
Joined: Nov 18, 2013

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1076 » by ozthegandp » Wed Dec 18, 2013 9:34 pm

Ruzious wrote:
ozthegandp wrote:we should definately at least try to get ridnour though.

Sent from my SPH-D710VMUB using RealGM Forums mobile app

You know how guards often lose a whole step in their early 30's and really can't play effectively anymore - except for maybe a game here or there? That's what happened to Luke. He's basically done at 32.


we dont need him to get his own shot. we need him to run the offense for the second unit and create shots for guys like Webster and harrington. which he is capable of doing. also hes a still a good pick and roll pg. hes not completly done either. he avged 10 and 4 last yr playing against starters. thats a hell of a lot better than we have on the bench right now.

Sent from my SPH-D710VMUB using RealGM Forums mobile app
User avatar
Nivek
Head Coach
Posts: 7,406
And1: 959
Joined: Sep 29, 2010
Contact:
         

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1077 » by Nivek » Wed Dec 18, 2013 9:37 pm

The big selling point on Maynor was his ability to "run the offense" and create shots for the 2nd unit. Ridnour hasn't been as bad as Maynor this season, but he's been terrible. If the Wizards had an expiring torn ACL to trade for him, then sure -- he's no worse than Maynor or Temple. If they're trying to improve their backup PG play, Ridnour isn't the guy.
"A lot of what we call talent is the desire to practice."
-- Malcolm Gladwell

Check out my blog about the Wizards, movies, writing, music, TV, sports, and whatever else comes to mind.
ozthegandp
Sophomore
Posts: 160
And1: 20
Joined: Nov 18, 2013

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1078 » by ozthegandp » Wed Dec 18, 2013 9:56 pm

Nivek wrote:The big selling point on Maynor was his ability to "run the offense" and create shots for the 2nd unit. Ridnour hasn't been as bad as Maynor this season, but he's been terrible. If the Wizards had an expiring torn ACL to trade for him, then sure -- he's no worse than Maynor or Temple. If they're trying to improve their backup PG play, Ridnour isn't the guy.


the problem was maynor never had a history of doing any such thing. we were just hoping. and
torn ACL> maynor

Sent from my SPH-D710VMUB using RealGM Forums mobile app
User avatar
Nivek
Head Coach
Posts: 7,406
And1: 959
Joined: Sep 29, 2010
Contact:
         

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1079 » by Nivek » Wed Dec 18, 2013 10:42 pm

Agreed on Maynor. And Ridnour was okay last season. Maybe worth doing if the acquisition cost is low.
"A lot of what we call talent is the desire to practice."
-- Malcolm Gladwell

Check out my blog about the Wizards, movies, writing, music, TV, sports, and whatever else comes to mind.
User avatar
GeeWiz
Sophomore
Posts: 205
And1: 15
Joined: Nov 28, 2013

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1080 » by GeeWiz » Wed Dec 18, 2013 11:38 pm

LyricalRico wrote:Any way we can insert ourselves into the rumored HOU/BOS deal? Maybe take back Courtney Lee and a second while giving up Maynor? Helps our SG depth and doesn't hurt our cap if we assume Gortat will be resigned.


With Webster, Rice, Beal, Porter, and Ariza, I feel like we have enough wings as is. Then again, were talking Maynor, so id take anything.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums

Return to Washington Wizards