Image ImageImage Image

Blazers, Bulls Discussed Aldridge For Noah During Offseason

Moderators: HomoSapien, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23

Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,177
And1: 9,008
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: Blazers, Bulls Discussed Aldridge For Noah During Offsea 

Post#21 » by Chi town » Tue Dec 24, 2013 8:21 pm

Red Larrivee wrote:
Red-Bulls83 wrote:My stance was that trading Noah would leave us with no one to player center and that Aldridge was not a good enough to player to cover for that hole we would create. And it's still debatable that he actually is.
Like Dantown said, Aldridge is producing number's similar to his recent years in the league. Matthews, Batum's and Lillards improvements have also heavily contributed to the Blazers great season thus far.

Also the rumor was that Jimmy Butler would have had to be included, so that would have left two holes in our starting lineup.


Butler's inclusion was an assumption by K.C.. Even if it wasn't, you don't think Butler/Noah for a Top 3 PF is a good enough deal?

I mean, I always preferred Love over Aldridge, but still. I think we're overrating the value of some of our guys. I like Butler, but to this point he's pretty much an average rotation player.


I mostly agree but Jimmy hasn't had enough burn this year to really determine fully who he is yet.

I've always wanted Love over LMA as well.

A Noah swap for LMA would have been good and then I'm sure we cold have gotten Asik too. But we all know that it would have taken alot more to get LMA.
User avatar
dougthonus
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 58,646
And1: 18,754
Joined: Dec 22, 2004
Contact:
 

Re: Blazers, Bulls Discussed Aldridge For Noah During Offsea 

Post#22 » by dougthonus » Tue Dec 24, 2013 8:25 pm

Wow, Ric Bucher landed at the Bleacher Report?
User avatar
JackFinn
RealGM
Posts: 15,121
And1: 1,605
Joined: Oct 08, 2006

Re: Blazers, Bulls Discussed Aldridge For Noah During Offsea 

Post#23 » by JackFinn » Tue Dec 24, 2013 8:28 pm

dougthonus wrote:Wow, Ric Bucher landed at the Bleacher Report?

#101 site in the US and #279 globally. http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/bleacherreport.com

Everyone sucks.
WinCity
Banned User
Posts: 8,488
And1: 1,688
Joined: Mar 18, 2011

Re: Blazers, Bulls Discussed Aldridge For Noah During Offsea 

Post#24 » by WinCity » Tue Dec 24, 2013 8:30 pm

Tough call. Losing Noah for Aldridge does leave you a hole at center but a big upgrade at PF. In the end you have to take the upgrade as Aldridge has certainly performed like a second option should. Would have been so much easier had we held onto Asik...Gar strikes again :)
DanTown8587
RealGM
Posts: 37,583
And1: 9,333
Joined: Jan 06, 2008
Location: Chicago
     

Re: Blazers, Bulls Discussed Aldridge For Noah During Offsea 

Post#25 » by DanTown8587 » Tue Dec 24, 2013 8:38 pm

dougthonus wrote:Wow, Ric Bucher landed at the Bleacher Report?


They're trying to become legit after the they were bought by I think AOL.
...
AshyLarrysDiaper
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 16,153
And1: 7,830
Joined: Jul 16, 2004
Location: Oakland

Re: Blazers, Bulls Discussed Aldridge For Noah During Offsea 

Post#26 » by AshyLarrysDiaper » Tue Dec 24, 2013 8:42 pm

dougthonus wrote:Wow, Ric Bucher landed at the Bleacher Report?


B/R's been poaching national writers since the summer. It's part of their rebranding after the Turner acquisition. And judging by the frequency that B/R articles are posted on this forum lately, I'd say it's working. Just a couple years ago you'd have been laughed off the board for dropping their links.
Contribute to the "Fire GarPax" billboard here:
https://www.gofundme.com/3v7fc-let-our-voices-be-heard-firegarpax
DanTown8587
RealGM
Posts: 37,583
And1: 9,333
Joined: Jan 06, 2008
Location: Chicago
     

Re: Blazers, Bulls Discussed Aldridge For Noah During Offsea 

Post#27 » by DanTown8587 » Tue Dec 24, 2013 8:47 pm

Red Larrivee wrote:
Red-Bulls83 wrote:My stance was that trading Noah would leave us with no one to player center and that Aldridge was not a good enough to player to cover for that hole we would create. And it's still debatable that he actually is.
Like Dantown said, Aldridge is producing number's similar to his recent years in the league. Matthews, Batum's and Lillards improvements have also heavily contributed to the Blazers great season thus far.

Also the rumor was that Jimmy Butler would have had to be included, so that would have left two holes in our starting lineup.


Butler's inclusion was an assumption by K.C.. Even if it wasn't, you don't think Butler/Noah for a Top 3 PF is a good enough deal?

I mean, I always preferred Love over Aldridge, but still. I think we're overrating the value of some of our guys. I like Butler, but to this point he's pretty much an average rotation player. He's not irreplaceable.


There is a VAST difference between Kevin Love and LaMarcus Aldridge. The raw stats would say there isn't but the fact the PER is over 5 points apart (27.9 v 22.7) and the TS is miles apart (.589 for Love, .515 for Aldridge) explains the gulf.

Really, Aldridge is a very good volume scorer and there is of course good value in that at the PF spot. My only point on Aldridge is that trading Noah, Butler (at the time), and then limiting Mirotic's value is basically an all-in move. Lets say Derrick isn't hurt, you're really telling me that

Rose/Hinrich
Snell
Deng/Dunleavy
Boozer/Gibson
Aldridge

Is a title winner? That team can't guard the Pacers now and against Miami, you're getting into a scoring battle with two guys are aren't efficient against three who are. You can't really let Deng walk, you're capped out, you have limited assets to get any sort of secondary ball handler.

I just don't see how going from Boozer to Aldridge makes up for the fact that you don't have a C and you're paying 40 million to guys at the PF/C spot and none of them are efficient scorers.
...
User avatar
dougthonus
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 58,646
And1: 18,754
Joined: Dec 22, 2004
Contact:
 

Re: Blazers, Bulls Discussed Aldridge For Noah During Offsea 

Post#28 » by dougthonus » Tue Dec 24, 2013 9:09 pm

AshyLarrysDiaper wrote:
dougthonus wrote:Wow, Ric Bucher landed at the Bleacher Report?


B/R's been poaching national writers since the summer. It's part of their rebranding after the Turner acquisition. And judging by the frequency that B/R articles are posted on this forum lately, I'd say it's working. Just a couple years ago you'd have been laughed off the board for dropping their links.


Well, I don't think they poached Bucher per se, he never landed a gig at a respectable place after getting canned from ESPN did he?

I also can't say I've seen people posting bleacher report stuff frequently. I have noticed that google seems to have massively dumped their links, because I haven't come across them when searching in a long time. Either that or my off season searching is much different than my in-season searching.
waffle
RealGM
Posts: 11,343
And1: 1,761
Joined: Jun 07, 2002
Location: Don't question the finger and do respect the black box. That is all.....

Re: Blazers, Bulls Discussed Aldridge For Noah During Offsea 

Post#29 » by waffle » Tue Dec 24, 2013 9:33 pm

Aldridge is just ONE OF THOSE guys on this board. Lots of fanboys. Has been since he was drafted

to me his is average. Good, but not elite.

Now I have always been a huge Noah supporter since before we drafted him.

so FOR ME I would never do this trade.

the one wild card is health. Gosh I hope Noah can stay healthy!
Doom
Banned User
Posts: 2,387
And1: 310
Joined: Mar 22, 2013

Re: Blazers, Bulls Discussed Aldridge For Noah During Offsea 

Post#30 » by Doom » Tue Dec 24, 2013 9:38 pm

aldridge would sure help our problems...
User avatar
RedBulls23
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 38,338
And1: 21,318
Joined: Jan 19, 2009
Location: Waiting in Grant Park
       

Re: Blazers, Bulls Discussed Aldridge For Noah During Offsea 

Post#31 » by RedBulls23 » Tue Dec 24, 2013 9:43 pm

Red Larrivee wrote:
Red-Bulls83 wrote:My stance was that trading Noah would leave us with no one to player center and that Aldridge was not a good enough to player to cover for that hole we would create. And it's still debatable that he actually is.
Like Dantown said, Aldridge is producing number's similar to his recent years in the league. Matthews, Batum's and Lillards improvements have also heavily contributed to the Blazers great season thus far.

Also the rumor was that Jimmy Butler would have had to be included, so that would have left two holes in our starting lineup.


Butler's inclusion was an assumption by K.C.. Even if it wasn't, you don't think Butler/Noah for a Top 3 PF is a good enough deal?

I mean, I always preferred Love over Aldridge, but still. I think we're overrating the value of some of our guys. I like Butler, but to this point he's pretty much an average rotation player. He's not irreplaceable.

Again, if it left us with no center, then yes it would be a bad trade. For example, if we had asik still, we could have done that noah for aldridge swap.
My Tweets:@Salim_BGhoops
AshyLarrysDiaper
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 16,153
And1: 7,830
Joined: Jul 16, 2004
Location: Oakland

Re: Blazers, Bulls Discussed Aldridge For Noah During Offsea 

Post#32 » by AshyLarrysDiaper » Tue Dec 24, 2013 9:59 pm

dougthonus wrote:
AshyLarrysDiaper wrote:
dougthonus wrote:Wow, Ric Bucher landed at the Bleacher Report?


B/R's been poaching national writers since the summer. It's part of their rebranding after the Turner acquisition. And judging by the frequency that B/R articles are posted on this forum lately, I'd say it's working. Just a couple years ago you'd have been laughed off the board for dropping their links.


Well, I don't think they poached Bucher per se, he never landed a gig at a respectable place after getting canned from ESPN did he?

I also can't say I've seen people posting bleacher report stuff frequently. I have noticed that google seems to have massively dumped their links, because I haven't come across them when searching in a long time. Either that or my off season searching is much different than my in-season searching.


No, you're right, Bucher was doing sideline reporting for the Warriors. But they did hire Howard Beck away from the NY Times along with some other guys with national reputations.
Contribute to the "Fire GarPax" billboard here:
https://www.gofundme.com/3v7fc-let-our-voices-be-heard-firegarpax
User avatar
kyrv
RealGM
Posts: 60,434
And1: 3,788
Joined: Jan 02, 2003
Location: Intimidated by TNT

Re: Blazers, Bulls Discussed Aldridge For Noah During Offsea 

Post#33 » by kyrv » Tue Dec 24, 2013 10:02 pm

dice wrote:
DanTown8587 wrote:I love that Aldridge is going to get a lot of the credit for Portland's great start when he's been a very similar player to what his career numbers suggest. The Blazers are getting amazing contributions from Matthews and Batum that they didn't get last year plus everything Robin Lopez has been compared to what they got from Hickson.

absolutely. that lamarcus aldridge is suddenly being talked about as one of the best players in the league is laughable. he's still primarily a jumpshooter and is having the worst shooting season of his eight year career

we already have 3 power forwards either here or in the pipeline. at no point did it make sense to trade for aldridge. still doesn't

merry xmas to all and to all a good night


Also, wasn't it Noah and stuff for Aldridge? I was certain it was Noah and goodies?
Bill Walton wrote: Keep the music playing.
User avatar
kyrv
RealGM
Posts: 60,434
And1: 3,788
Joined: Jan 02, 2003
Location: Intimidated by TNT

Re: Blazers, Bulls Discussed Aldridge For Noah During Offsea 

Post#34 » by kyrv » Tue Dec 24, 2013 10:02 pm

dougthonus wrote:Wow, Ric Bucher landed at the Bleacher Report?


He'll never write another article for ESPN. :lol:
Bill Walton wrote: Keep the music playing.
User avatar
PaKii94
RealGM
Posts: 10,698
And1: 6,738
Joined: Aug 22, 2013
     

Re: Blazers, Bulls Discussed Aldridge For Noah During Offsea 

Post#35 » by PaKii94 » Tue Dec 24, 2013 10:18 pm

kyrv wrote:
dice wrote:
DanTown8587 wrote:I love that Aldridge is going to get a lot of the credit for Portland's great start when he's been a very similar player to what his career numbers suggest. The Blazers are getting amazing contributions from Matthews and Batum that they didn't get last year plus everything Robin Lopez has been compared to what they got from Hickson.

absolutely. that lamarcus aldridge is suddenly being talked about as one of the best players in the league is laughable. he's still primarily a jumpshooter and is having the worst shooting season of his eight year career

we already have 3 power forwards either here or in the pipeline. at no point did it make sense to trade for aldridge. still doesn't

merry xmas to all and to all a good night


Also, wasn't it Noah and stuff for Aldridge? I was certain it was Noah and goodies?


It was said to be atleast Noah, butler, cats pick.

I think blazers also were looking for mirotic too

Sent from my HTC One X using RealGM Forums mobile app
User avatar
kyrv
RealGM
Posts: 60,434
And1: 3,788
Joined: Jan 02, 2003
Location: Intimidated by TNT

Re: Blazers, Bulls Discussed Aldridge For Noah During Offsea 

Post#36 » by kyrv » Tue Dec 24, 2013 10:20 pm

PaKii94 wrote:
kyrv wrote:
dice wrote:absolutely. that lamarcus aldridge is suddenly being talked about as one of the best players in the league is laughable. he's still primarily a jumpshooter and is having the worst shooting season of his eight year career

we already have 3 power forwards either here or in the pipeline. at no point did it make sense to trade for aldridge. still doesn't

merry xmas to all and to all a good night


Also, wasn't it Noah and stuff for Aldridge? I was certain it was Noah and goodies?


It was said to be atleast Noah, butler, cats pick.

I think blazers also were looking for mirotic too

Sent from my HTC One X using RealGM Forums mobile app


Thanks! I thought I recalled having to type in "it's not just 1 for 1" every time someone said Aldridge is better.

Portland and Houston are not known for fire sales. :O
Bill Walton wrote: Keep the music playing.
bledredwine
RealGM
Posts: 14,647
And1: 5,782
Joined: Sep 17, 2010
   

Re: Blazers, Bulls Discussed Aldridge For Noah During Offsea 

Post#37 » by bledredwine » Tue Dec 24, 2013 10:21 pm

I remember posters on this forum were saying they wouldn't do Noah for Aldridge straight up ..... ?? :banghead:
:o LeBron is 0-7 in game winning/tying FGs in the finals. And is 20/116 or 17% in game winning/tying FGs in the 4th/OT for his career. That's historically bad :o
No-Man
RealGM
Posts: 14,879
And1: 3,480
Joined: Feb 11, 2012

Re: Blazers, Bulls Discussed Aldridge For Noah During Offsea 

Post#38 » by No-Man » Tue Dec 24, 2013 10:27 pm

[d][R][o][s][e] wrote:they probably wanted mirotic's rights as well.. we just don't know. and it would also be a slap on the face on pax when we could have had him. hopefully that cat's pick would turn out to be a stud.

You will need luck to get a stud with a 19th pick.
User avatar
kyrv
RealGM
Posts: 60,434
And1: 3,788
Joined: Jan 02, 2003
Location: Intimidated by TNT

Re: Blazers, Bulls Discussed Aldridge For Noah During Offsea 

Post#39 » by kyrv » Tue Dec 24, 2013 10:29 pm

bledredwine wrote:I remember posters on this forum were saying they wouldn't do Noah for Aldridge straight up ..... ?? :banghead:


Well nobody would because Portland wouldn't, so kind of a moot point really.
Bill Walton wrote: Keep the music playing.
User avatar
PMONSTER
Head Coach
Posts: 6,400
And1: 1,301
Joined: Nov 28, 2009
     

Re: Blazers, Bulls Discussed Aldridge For Noah During Offsea 

Post#40 » by PMONSTER » Tue Dec 24, 2013 10:41 pm

I wonder if the Spurs would've said no to Splitter/Leonard/Bobcats pick for Aldridge?

Anyway.....

viewtopic.php?f=10&t=1258325 Part 1

viewtopic.php?f=10&t=1258600 Part 2

I found those old threads about LaMarcus Aldridge wanting Chicago.... good times
NBA Playoffs.... I can never wait!

Return to Chicago Bulls