ImageImageImage

DET @ WAS- 12/28/13

Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites

princeofpalace
RealGM
Posts: 21,982
And1: 1,636
Joined: Aug 01, 2006

Re: DET @ WAS- 12/28/13 

Post#201 » by princeofpalace » Mon Dec 30, 2013 2:04 am

Blkbrd671 wrote:
ComboGuardCity wrote:
We're most definitely scoring enough points. We're giving up more, which is the bigger problem. Our advanced stats behind the line are bad. However, we are dominating the paint. If we even had an average defensive team we would be projected 5 games over .500 right now. Defensively it's not working at all which is why we're at where we're at.


totally agree with CGC, if we are letting teams score 100+ on us nightly, fixing spacing issues isn't going to translate into wins.


You can't look at this in a vacuum. Our defense is bad because our offense is bad. We have no spacing so we miss a lot of shots- opposing teams get those rebounds and score before our defense gets set. Spacing is absolutely a major problem on this team.
User avatar
Blkbrd671
RealGM
Posts: 30,862
And1: 4,819
Joined: Oct 05, 2010
Location: Guam,USA
       

Re: DET @ WAS- 12/28/13 

Post#202 » by Blkbrd671 » Mon Dec 30, 2013 2:33 am

princeofpalace wrote:
Blkbrd671 wrote:
ComboGuardCity wrote:
We're most definitely scoring enough points. We're giving up more, which is the bigger problem. Our advanced stats behind the line are bad. However, we are dominating the paint. If we even had an average defensive team we would be projected 5 games over .500 right now. Defensively it's not working at all which is why we're at where we're at.


totally agree with CGC, if we are letting teams score 100+ on us nightly, fixing spacing issues isn't going to translate into wins.


You can't look at this in a vacuum. Our defense is bad because our offense is bad. We have no spacing so we miss a lot of shots- opposing teams get those rebounds and score before our defense gets set. Spacing is absolutely a major problem on this team.


Good point pop, however if we get more defensive stops, we'll get more transitional opportunities to score. I think all our problems are a product of each other. I think a argument can be made for both sides, though when I watch I don't feel like a lot of teams get easy transition points on us. I feel most our points given up are lack of defensive discipline by both Jennings and moose
User avatar
ComboGuardCity
RealGM
Posts: 25,973
And1: 4,897
Joined: Jul 10, 2010

Re: DET @ WAS- 12/28/13 

Post#203 » by ComboGuardCity » Mon Dec 30, 2013 4:46 am

princeofpalace wrote:
Blkbrd671 wrote:
ComboGuardCity wrote:
We're most definitely scoring enough points. We're giving up more, which is the bigger problem. Our advanced stats behind the line are bad. However, we are dominating the paint. If we even had an average defensive team we would be projected 5 games over .500 right now. Defensively it's not working at all which is why we're at where we're at.


totally agree with CGC, if we are letting teams score 100+ on us nightly, fixing spacing issues isn't going to translate into wins.


You can't look at this in a vacuum. Our defense is bad because our offense is bad. We have no spacing so we miss a lot of shots- opposing teams get those rebounds and score before our defense gets set. Spacing is absolutely a major problem on this team.


We're average against the fast break. It's our rotations which are really awful. Smith is trying to play free safety and it's not working.
User avatar
Piston Pete
RealGM
Posts: 19,070
And1: 1,352
Joined: Feb 07, 2002
Location: Way out in left field

Re: DET @ WAS- 12/28/13 

Post#204 » by Piston Pete » Mon Dec 30, 2013 4:57 am

Basically, this team is flawed.


Offensively;
We have 3 PF/C's starting next to each other. All three guys are most effective in the paint. Its as simple as that.


Defensively;
We're lazy on defense. Jennings takes plays off on this side of the ball from time to time, and Smith is much better at PF as the weakside rim protector....but as our SF, hes often out on the perimeter. And he's not quick enough to check quicker SFs either, for that matter. And Monroe's D has never been one of his strong suits.
princeofpalace
RealGM
Posts: 21,982
And1: 1,636
Joined: Aug 01, 2006

Re: DET @ WAS- 12/28/13 

Post#205 » by princeofpalace » Mon Dec 30, 2013 1:19 pm

Piston Pete wrote:Basically, this team is flawed.


Offensively;
We have 3 PF/C's starting next to each other. All three guys are most effective in the paint. Its as simple as that.


Defensively;
We're lazy on defense. Jennings takes plays off on this side of the ball from time to time, and Smith is much better at PF as the weakside rim protector....but as our SF, hes often out on the perimeter. And he's not quick enough to check quicker SFs either, for that matter. And Monroe's D has never been one of his strong suits. And Drummond is pretty lousy as our last line of defense


fixed

Return to Detroit Pistons