ImageImageImage

Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas

Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts

underneathtoDJ
Sophomore
Posts: 231
And1: 29
Joined: Jun 27, 2007

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1381 » by underneathtoDJ » Wed Jan 8, 2014 9:04 pm

3 team deal:

Bos:
Out: Bass, Bogans
In: B. Gordon, 2014 POR 1st

CHA:
Out; Gordon, '14 POR 1st, '15 or '16 CHA 1st (top 12 protected)
In: Bass, Dunleavy, Hinrich

CHI:
Out: Hinrich, Dunleavy
In: Bogans, '15/'16 CHA 1st

C's clear Bass' contract and pick up a late 1st from Portland. Charlotte gets 3 useful players for an expiring contract, a late 1st in this draft, and lotto protect '15 or '16 pick. They'd still retain Detroit's '14 1st. Bulls continue to clear salary and pick up another draft pick
"When I played, Larry Bird was the only one feared. A lot of black guys always ask me, 'Could Larry Bird really play that good?' I said man, Larry Bird was so good it was frightening." -Magic
User avatar
Slartibartfast
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,912
And1: 10,060
Joined: Oct 12, 2004
Location: Medieval England, Iowa
Contact:

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1382 » by Slartibartfast » Wed Jan 8, 2014 9:17 pm

rickrolled wrote:
NBA trade rumors - Bobcats shopping Ben Gordon.

- The Charlotte Bobcats are shopping Ben Gordon, according to league sources. They have talked to many teams about the veteran guard and are trying to move Gordon's $13,200,000 ending contract for a player who helps them win now. Charlotte has played well this season and currently sits in the East's seventh seed. They're expected to be buyers at the deadline, because they want to make the playoffs for just the second time in franchise history.

http://sulia.com/channel/detroit-piston ... ce=twitter



Looks like they're serious about making the playoffs, MKG will be back soon and they need a vet or two, maybe Bass,Crawford,Bogans for Gordon,Taylor and DET pick ?

Eventhough they liked Hump and may still do, Bass and Crawford is tough to pass up. Crawford is better than Taylor who is out for the season. Good trade for both teams.


Charlotte seems pretty set at combo guard (Walker/Sessions), so I doubt they'd have much interest in Crawford.

Bass/Bogans maybe.

If only we could talk them into taking back favorite son Gerald Wallace. He shoots 3's like they're free throws!
User avatar
Slartibartfast
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,912
And1: 10,060
Joined: Oct 12, 2004
Location: Medieval England, Iowa
Contact:

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1383 » by Slartibartfast » Wed Jan 8, 2014 9:31 pm

underneathtoDJ wrote:3 team deal:

Bos:
Out: Bass, Bogans
In: B. Gordon, 2014 POR 1st

CHA:
Out; Gordon, '14 POR 1st, '15 or '16 CHA 1st (top 12 protected)
In: Bass, Dunleavy, Hinrich

CHI:
Out: Hinrich, Dunleavy
In: Bogans, '15/'16 CHA 1st

C's clear Bass' contract and pick up a late 1st from Portland. Charlotte gets 3 useful players for an expiring contract, a late 1st in this draft, and lotto protect '15 or '16 pick. They'd still retain Detroit's '14 1st. Bulls continue to clear salary and pick up another draft pick


Clever inclusion of Chicago (Charlotte could definitely use Dunleavy), but my goodness, Charlotte trading 2 picks for 3 half-decent bench players, two of whom are over 30? No way.

This would make more sense:

Boston sends: Bass/Bogans/Crawford
Boston receives: Ben Gordon

Charlotte sends: Ben Gordon
Charlotte receives: Bass/Hinrich/Dunleavy

Chicago sends: Hinrich/Dunleavy
Chicago receives: Bogans/Crawford

Boston shouldn't expect a pick for Bass - he's on a negative value contract. Crawford is the weak sweetener we throw in so we don't have to give up a pick.
Andrew McCeltic
RealGM
Posts: 23,153
And1: 8,549
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
 

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1384 » by Andrew McCeltic » Wed Jan 8, 2014 9:34 pm

I'd offer the Cats Bass/Green for Gordon/MKG and see if they bite.. but given that they're in the playoff hunt with Kidd-Gilchrist missing time, more likely the best we can hope for is Bass/Bogans for Gordon..
Andrew McCeltic
RealGM
Posts: 23,153
And1: 8,549
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
 

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1385 » by Andrew McCeltic » Wed Jan 8, 2014 9:36 pm

And the only Gerald Wallace trade I can envision is to SAC for Thornton and Fredette, maybe with Crawford or a pick leaving for the Kings. They get a defense-first veteran who 'plays hard', we shed salary and hope Thornton can come back to life as a bench scorer..
sdballer
Senior
Posts: 700
And1: 269
Joined: Dec 30, 2012

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1386 » by sdballer » Wed Jan 8, 2014 10:30 pm

andy582 wrote:And the only Gerald Wallace trade I can envision is to SAC for Thornton and Fredette, maybe with Crawford or a pick leaving for the Kings. They get a defense-first veteran who 'plays hard', we shed salary and hope Thornton can come back to life as a bench scorer..


Wallace's extra year kills almost any trade value he has.
User avatar
GreenMachine
Head Coach
Posts: 6,416
And1: 998
Joined: Jun 05, 2003

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1387 » by GreenMachine » Wed Jan 8, 2014 10:34 pm

underneathtoDJ wrote:3 team deal:

Bos:
Out: Bass, Bogans
In: B. Gordon, 2014 POR 1st

CHA:
Out; Gordon, '14 POR 1st, '15 or '16 CHA 1st (top 12 protected)
In: Bass, Dunleavy, Hinrich

CHI:
Out: Hinrich, Dunleavy
In: Bogans, '15/'16 CHA 1st

C's clear Bass' contract and pick up a late 1st from Portland. Charlotte gets 3 useful players for an expiring contract, a late 1st in this draft, and lotto protect '15 or '16 pick. They'd still retain Detroit's '14 1st. Bulls continue to clear salary and pick up another draft pick


The Bulls laugh at you for suggesting this.
User avatar
BRUNiNHO91
RealGM
Posts: 30,422
And1: 23,552
Joined: Mar 04, 2009
Location: Rio De Janeiro, Brasil...
     

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1388 » by BRUNiNHO91 » Wed Jan 8, 2014 10:34 pm

Wallace will be traded next year at the deadline IMO. No chance this year. Unless it's a massive deal again like the PP/KG one.
WHAT THEY GON’ SAY NOW? ‎ THANK YOU TRUTH!
User avatar
GreenMachine
Head Coach
Posts: 6,416
And1: 998
Joined: Jun 05, 2003

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1389 » by GreenMachine » Wed Jan 8, 2014 10:37 pm

Slartibartfast wrote:Boston shouldn't expect a pick for Bass - he's on a negative value contract.


Actually... no, he's not. He is quite desirable as a 3rd big. DA has already turned down a late first for him. #fact
User avatar
Murta
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,644
And1: 1,823
Joined: Feb 11, 2012
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
     

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1390 » by Murta » Wed Jan 8, 2014 10:39 pm

I was thinking about this trade for a few days and now have to post it in this context:

CHA: Bradley, Green, Wallace
BOS: Gordon, MKG, DET and POR pick

Charlotte gets great playoff push and a parter for Walker, defensive minded one. (Though both being undersized is bad)

Boston gets picks and MKG while dumping Wallace's contract and not overpaying Bradley. Ainge can go rouge during the offseason and offer Hayward max money. This would get us terrific young core:

MKG, Sully, Hayward, our high pick, two mid-first, one late first while also keeping Rondo and all of the picks.

Not sure if CHA gives us both picks, but just Detroit one would be a great push.
Florida celtic
Freshman
Posts: 75
And1: 12
Joined: Dec 03, 2013

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1391 » by Florida celtic » Wed Jan 8, 2014 10:48 pm

Wallace and Bass for Gordon works moneywise.

Who says no? BOS OR CHA
CelticFaninLBC
RealGM
Posts: 10,159
And1: 3,257
Joined: Aug 16, 2004

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1392 » by CelticFaninLBC » Wed Jan 8, 2014 11:05 pm

GreenMachine wrote:
Slartibartfast wrote:Boston shouldn't expect a pick for Bass - he's on a negative value contract.


Actually... no, he's not. He is quite desirable as a 3rd big. DA has already turned down a late first for him. #fact


From what team?
User avatar
GreenMachine
Head Coach
Posts: 6,416
And1: 998
Joined: Jun 05, 2003

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1393 » by GreenMachine » Wed Jan 8, 2014 11:07 pm

CelticFaninLBC wrote:
GreenMachine wrote:
Slartibartfast wrote:Boston shouldn't expect a pick for Bass - he's on a negative value contract.


Actually... no, he's not. He is quite desirable as a 3rd big. DA has already turned down a late first for him. #fact


From what team?


Not sure. Source just said "late first".
rickrolled
Head Coach
Posts: 6,453
And1: 2,652
Joined: Nov 12, 2011

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1394 » by rickrolled » Wed Jan 8, 2014 11:10 pm

Slartibartfast wrote:
rickrolled wrote:
NBA trade rumors - Bobcats shopping Ben Gordon.

- The Charlotte Bobcats are shopping Ben Gordon, according to league sources. They have talked to many teams about the veteran guard and are trying to move Gordon's $13,200,000 ending contract for a player who helps them win now. Charlotte has played well this season and currently sits in the East's seventh seed. They're expected to be buyers at the deadline, because they want to make the playoffs for just the second time in franchise history.

http://sulia.com/channel/detroit-piston ... ce=twitter



Looks like they're serious about making the playoffs, MKG will be back soon and they need a vet or two, maybe Bass,Crawford,Bogans for Gordon,Taylor and DET pick ?

Eventhough they liked Hump and may still do, Bass and Crawford is tough to pass up. Crawford is better than Taylor who is out for the season. Good trade for both teams.


Charlotte seems pretty set at combo guard (Walker/Sessions), so I doubt they'd have much interest in Crawford.

Bass/Bogans maybe.

If only we could talk them into taking back favorite son Gerald Wallace. He shoots 3's like they're free throws!

I detect a little sarcasm there with the FT shooting..but yeah he is just great from 3 pt land. especially how he bends sideways when shooting them.

why would they not have interest in crawford who is a sweetener and expiring ?
User avatar
Slartibartfast
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,912
And1: 10,060
Joined: Oct 12, 2004
Location: Medieval England, Iowa
Contact:

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1395 » by Slartibartfast » Wed Jan 8, 2014 11:24 pm

GreenMachine wrote:
Slartibartfast wrote:Boston shouldn't expect a pick for Bass - he's on a negative value contract.


Actually... no, he's not. He is quite desirable as a 3rd big. DA has already turned down a late first for him. #fact


When did DA turn down a first for Bass? That's the first I've heard that.

Bass is making $6.5 mil this year and almost $7 mil next year. He shoots well under 50% from the field and can't rebound and is too undersized to protect the rim.

Look around the league to see what similar players are making: Luis Scola, $4.5 mil, Dante Cunningham, $2.2 mil, Jason Smith $2.5 mil, Nick Collison $2.6 mil, Jason Maxiell $2.5 mil, Boris Diaw $4.7 mil, Ty Hansbrough $3.2 mil...

The direct comparisons are Big Baby (widely perceived as overpaid), Carl Landry (a much better scorer than Bass) and Amir Johnson (a better rebounder, better size).

He's not an albatross, but he's not a prize commodity. A slightly negative value.
User avatar
Captain_Caveman
RealGM
Posts: 25,904
And1: 38,513
Joined: Jun 25, 2007
       

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1396 » by Captain_Caveman » Thu Jan 9, 2014 12:03 am

sdballer wrote:
andy582 wrote:And the only Gerald Wallace trade I can envision is to SAC for Thornton and Fredette, maybe with Crawford or a pick leaving for the Kings. They get a defense-first veteran who 'plays hard', we shed salary and hope Thornton can come back to life as a bench scorer..


Wallace's extra year kills almost any trade value he has.


That's why we should wait a year.
User avatar
Captain_Caveman
RealGM
Posts: 25,904
And1: 38,513
Joined: Jun 25, 2007
       

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1397 » by Captain_Caveman » Thu Jan 9, 2014 12:04 am

GreenMachine wrote:
underneathtoDJ wrote:3 team deal:

Bos:
Out: Bass, Bogans
In: B. Gordon, 2014 POR 1st

CHA:
Out; Gordon, '14 POR 1st, '15 or '16 CHA 1st (top 12 protected)
In: Bass, Dunleavy, Hinrich

CHI:
Out: Hinrich, Dunleavy
In: Bogans, '15/'16 CHA 1st

C's clear Bass' contract and pick up a late 1st from Portland. Charlotte gets 3 useful players for an expiring contract, a late 1st in this draft, and lotto protect '15 or '16 pick. They'd still retain Detroit's '14 1st. Bulls continue to clear salary and pick up another draft pick


The Bulls laugh at you for suggesting this.


Why?
User avatar
BRUNiNHO91
RealGM
Posts: 30,422
And1: 23,552
Joined: Mar 04, 2009
Location: Rio De Janeiro, Brasil...
     

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1398 » by BRUNiNHO91 » Thu Jan 9, 2014 12:09 am

Cap space and a first rounder for Kirk Hinrich? That's a great deal. That's like saying we would laugh if anybody offered us an expiring and a first for Bass.
WHAT THEY GON’ SAY NOW? ‎ THANK YOU TRUTH!
User avatar
GreenMachine
Head Coach
Posts: 6,416
And1: 998
Joined: Jun 05, 2003

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1399 » by GreenMachine » Thu Jan 9, 2014 12:35 am

BRUNiNHO91 wrote:Cap space and a first rounder for Kirk Hinrich? That's a great deal. That's like saying we would laugh if anybody offered us an expiring and a first for Bass.


A top 12 protected pick for Kirk AND Dunleavy? Because they can get a late first rounder for each of those guys AT WORSE.
brackdan70
RealGM
Posts: 18,354
And1: 13,198
Joined: Jul 15, 2013
Location: Ogden, UT
   

Re: Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas 

Post#1400 » by brackdan70 » Thu Jan 9, 2014 12:39 am

GreenMachine wrote:
Slartibartfast wrote:Boston shouldn't expect a pick for Bass - he's on a negative value contract.


Actually... no, he's not. He is quite desirable as a 3rd big. DA has already turned down a late first for him. #fact


really?
Jordan Walsh > Lonnie Walker and Charles Bassey

Return to Boston Celtics