RIPskaterdude wrote:Ellis and IT in the backcourt would have been horrible, though. Not that we can get much worse now but for the future, at least. Probably would have meant the end of IT due to the money we had invested in Ellis/Gay. Then again, with Ellis, I wonder if we even trade for Gay.
I always felt that Ellis is at his best where he plays off from someone. This year, he is playing with Dirk and co and his percentages/advance stats are up. IT/Ellis backcourt >> IT/McLemore or IT/Thornton right now. Signing Ellis would have provided insurance if we lose IT to FA.
I think we would have traded for Gay because at the time, SF position was the glaring issue for us and there was a lot of pressure and angst for a legit SF. And Gay was at his lowest trade worth. That said, ff we haven't traded for Rudy, we would have gotten another SF imo.