ImageImageImageImageImage

Futuristic ballpark design - do you like this for TO?

Moderator: JaysRule15

User avatar
whysoserious
RealGM
Posts: 30,555
And1: 8,634
Joined: Jun 19, 2004
       

Re: Futuristic ballpark design - do you like this for TO? 

Post#21 » by whysoserious » Tue Mar 18, 2014 2:39 am

gei wrote:I really don't get the unreasonable hate the dome gets. It's a pretty good baseball venue and far better than many others in the league I've been to (ie the horrible fenway park). Give us some real grass (which they're already planning) and we'll be good to go.

The dome is located excellently (literally could not be in a better location), and the roof is incredibly practical in toronto and has served us well over the years.


Location wise it's in the perfect place. The seats and on a nice day with the roof open it's not as bad.

Winning product and grass would obviously enhance the experience.

I find it aesthetically very drab and boring. Biggest thing that kind of gives it a depressing feeling is grey concrete everywhere and walking around. Just do something to brighten up the concourses and reduce the concrete, maybe some kind of brick look around the outside, and inside just some additional colour or something.
bballsparkin
RealGM
Posts: 11,801
And1: 8,370
Joined: Mar 03, 2009

Re: Futuristic ballpark design - do you like this for TO? 

Post#22 » by bballsparkin » Wed Mar 19, 2014 2:46 am

Komodo wrote:It's because opening/closing the dome is so expensive lol


Ya that's what I've heard. From my simple google search it seems like $100, 000 to open and close it. It's a much better feel when the roof is open though.
User avatar
uniballer
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,646
And1: 1,081
Joined: Jul 21, 2005
Location: Deeerty South Western Ontario
       

Re: Futuristic ballpark design - do you like this for TO? 

Post#23 » by uniballer » Sun Mar 23, 2014 12:19 am

duppyy wrote:I don't mind the dome due to being able to avoid rain. I wouldn't enjoy going to a game when it's raining.


I live in Windsor so I go to comerica often. It is an absolutely beautiful ballpark. However I don't care how beautiful of a ball park it is its miserable through April and some of may due to weather. They have to play day games throughout April because it's too cold at night. So in Toronto you sort of have to becareful what you wish for. The dome isn't that asthetically pleasing but it is very practical for a city with weather like Toronto.
Image
Credit to the great TZ
jaymeister15
RealGM
Posts: 11,965
And1: 1,072
Joined: Dec 30, 2003
Location: Ontario

Re: Futuristic ballpark design - do you like this for TO? 

Post#24 » by jaymeister15 » Sun Mar 23, 2014 3:32 am

bballsparkin wrote:
Ya that's what I've heard. From my simple google search it seems like $100, 000 to open and close it. It's a much better feel when the roof is open though.


Where did you get that number from? That doesn't sound right at all.
bballsparkin
RealGM
Posts: 11,801
And1: 8,370
Joined: Mar 03, 2009

Re: Futuristic ballpark design - do you like this for TO? 

Post#25 » by bballsparkin » Sun Mar 23, 2014 11:29 pm

I never got any factual stats. Just guestimations at those answer my question forums. So it very well could be wrong.

I saw a couple that stated $100,000. Like this one http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_c ... e?#slide=1. But they very well could be way off. No idea.
jaymeister15
RealGM
Posts: 11,965
And1: 1,072
Joined: Dec 30, 2003
Location: Ontario

Re: Futuristic ballpark design - do you like this for TO? 

Post#26 » by jaymeister15 » Mon Mar 24, 2014 1:46 am

That says $100
bballsparkin
RealGM
Posts: 11,801
And1: 8,370
Joined: Mar 03, 2009

Re: Futuristic ballpark design - do you like this for TO? 

Post#27 » by bballsparkin » Mon Mar 24, 2014 3:46 am

I swear I saw 100 grand on a couple different answers :oops: . But this one says $100 too. http://www.torontolife.com/daily-dish/2 ... -sports-3/

So if that's the case, I don't see why they don't open it more often.

edit: I guess $100 grand does seem extreme. :lol:
s e n s i
RealGM
Posts: 17,094
And1: 3,626
Joined: Mar 19, 2008
Location: Toronto
       

Re: Futuristic ballpark design - do you like this for TO? 

Post#28 » by s e n s i » Mon Mar 24, 2014 4:10 am

bballsparkin wrote:I swear I saw 100 grand on a couple different answers :oops: . But this one says $100 too. http://www.torontolife.com/daily-dish/2 ... -sports-3/

So if that's the case, I don't see why they don't open it more often.


because of inclement weather? they open the dome as much as possible during the season. despite playing outdoors being much better than indoors, it's just not practical to play in 8-15 degree weather in april or september when you have a retractable roof and can play or watch at a more comfortable climate. i can probably count on one hand the amount of games played indoors when the weather was decent enough the past couple years and even then it was debatable. just scroll through this twitter and see for yourself https://twitter.com/IstheDomeOpen . only reason it's been closed for a game was weather and playing in a soggy field with a waterlogged baseball sucks
galacticos2 wrote:MLB needs to introduce an Amnesty clause. Bautista would be my first victim.

Bautista outplays his contract by more than $70 million over the next four seasons (2013-2016).
bballsparkin
RealGM
Posts: 11,801
And1: 8,370
Joined: Mar 03, 2009

Re: Futuristic ballpark design - do you like this for TO? 

Post#29 » by bballsparkin » Mon Mar 24, 2014 4:13 am

I've been a couple times in the summer when the day was beautiful and they never opened it. But I don't go that often so perhaps it's a small sample size. Nonetheless, it's disappointing when the day is nice and they don't open it.

edit: cool link, thanks
User avatar
Geddy
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 69,890
And1: 78,609
Joined: Nov 30, 2005
Location: Drinking an extra cole Sprite
 

Re: Futuristic ballpark design - do you like this for TO? 

Post#30 » by Geddy » Tue Mar 25, 2014 3:47 am

The past few seasons they have been opening the roof more often compared to seasons past. They tend to even take some chances on overcast days now.
Inevitable wrote:Geddy is a good mod actually
bballsparkin
RealGM
Posts: 11,801
And1: 8,370
Joined: Mar 03, 2009

Re: Futuristic ballpark design - do you like this for TO? 

Post#31 » by bballsparkin » Tue Mar 25, 2014 7:36 pm

^^Sweet good to hear.

edit: with respects to opening the roof more often.

Return to Toronto Blue Jays