ImageImageImageImageImage

Bradley Beal - Part II

Moderators: nate33, montestewart, LyricalRico

User avatar
doclinkin
RealGM
Posts: 15,119
And1: 6,842
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: .wizuds.

Re: Bradley Beal - Part II 

Post#721 » by doclinkin » Thu May 1, 2014 3:45 pm

I liked Harden in the draft if Stef Curry was gone. But saw Beal as a better fit next to John Wall than the ball-dominant Harden.
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Bradley Beal - Part II 

Post#722 » by Ruzious » Thu May 1, 2014 3:51 pm

Whether people hate Harden or not (and I understand the hate), he's overwhelmingly better than Beal, at this point and likely will continue to be for at least the next few seasons. He'd fit fine with anyone - as shown by his ability to play at a tremendous level with Westbrook and Lin.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
DCZards
RealGM
Posts: 11,157
And1: 5,006
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Location: The Streets of DC
     

Re: Bradley Beal - Part II 

Post#723 » by DCZards » Thu May 1, 2014 6:11 pm

Yeah, got to take Harden over Beal at this point. But just the fact that the 20 year old Double B can even be mentioned in the same sentence as Harden--maybe the best SG in the game--speaks for itself.
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,171
And1: 7,947
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Bradley Beal - Part II 

Post#724 » by Dat2U » Thu May 1, 2014 6:57 pm

This stuff about Harden being overrated is borderline laughable. A TS% above .600 for 3 straight seasons. A PER over 23 the last two seasons. The guy averages over 5 assists a game from the SG position (LOL at him dominating the ball - he's only doing what's asked of him!). He had an ORtg of 120 this year which is elite considering his high usage. Wall had an ORtg of 106. Beal had an ORtg of 103. DAME!

Defensively he's a sieve. Yes, that definitely needs to be worked on. But it's much easier to hide a weak perimeter player than a low post one.

I pray for the day where Beal can be in the same category of player as Harden is as a 24 yr old RIGHT NOW!
CLIN
Junior
Posts: 261
And1: 46
Joined: Feb 26, 2011

Re: Bradley Beal - Part II 

Post#725 » by CLIN » Thu May 1, 2014 7:04 pm

Dat2U wrote:This stuff about Harden being overrated is borderline laughable. A TS% above .600 for 3 straight seasons. A PER over 23 the last two seasons. The guy averages over 5 assists a game from the SG position (LOL at him dominating the ball - he's only doing what's asked of him!). He had an ORtg of 120 this year which is elite considering his high usage. Wall had an ORtg of 106. Beal had an ORtg of 103. DAME!

Defensively he's a sieve. Yes, that definitely needs to be worked on. But it's much easier to hide a weak perimeter player than a low post one.

I pray for the day where Beal can be in the same category of player as Harden is as a 24 yr old RIGHT NOW!

Apologies if you guys have seen this before. Harden's offense is amazing, but his terrible defense is understated.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wVYJULACcao[/youtube]
User avatar
20MexicanosIn1Van
Veteran
Posts: 2,985
And1: 321
Joined: May 15, 2004
 

Re: Bradley Beal - Part II 

Post#726 » by 20MexicanosIn1Van » Thu May 1, 2014 7:06 pm

Illmatic21 wrote:Beal was a finalist for the NBA Sportsmanship Award (nominated and voted on by the players). Mike Conley won it:

http://www.nba.com/2014/news/04/24/mike ... hip-award/


What is the criteria for this award? Is it community service or lack of complaining on the court? Now that I think about it, Bradley Beal rarely, if ever, complains about calls. I like that. I haven't heard anything about his charitability though.
DCZards
RealGM
Posts: 11,157
And1: 5,006
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Location: The Streets of DC
     

Re: Bradley Beal - Part II 

Post#727 » by DCZards » Thu May 1, 2014 7:11 pm

CLIN wrote:Apologies if you guys have seen this before. Harden's offense is amazing, but his terrible defense is understated.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wVYJULACcao[/youtube]


Wow. Harden looks lost on D. But the worst part is he looks downright lazy.
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 20,597
And1: 5,211
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

Re: Bradley Beal - Part II 

Post#728 » by tontoz » Thu May 1, 2014 7:38 pm

I saw a rather long vid recently of Harden's defensive "highlights" and it was pretty ugly. I didn't watch the whole thing but it was bad. I could have played just as good on d hopping around on 1 leg.
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
User avatar
stevemcqueen1
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,588
And1: 1,137
Joined: Jan 25, 2013
     

Re: Bradley Beal - Part II 

Post#729 » by stevemcqueen1 » Thu May 1, 2014 7:41 pm

Beal is better than Harden was at 20. He's going to be better than Harden at 24,

Harden is the best SG in the game only because he's the only All Star caliber SG. For now. Harden is a one way player whose scoring is predicated on flopping and jumping into people and getting bailed out by the refs. Why he's so streaky and why he's typically sucked in the playoffs. He doesn't play defense and they stop calling his BS so much.

He really is a catastrophe on defense too. Houston's perimeter D is an embarrassment and their overall D sucks even though they have Beverly, Asik, and Howard. You wouldn't think that would be possible! Harden breaks their defense.

He's such a lousy iteration of a superstar. In OKC I would credit him as a poor man's Ginobli. In Houston he's a very poor man's Gil. It's like he got depressed and stopped caring about trying to play actual good basketball and win and is only trying to score a ton of points and impress onlookers and make Presti look dumb. I can't stand the way he plays and I am so glad we didn't trade for him.
AFM
RealGM
Posts: 12,577
And1: 8,801
Joined: May 25, 2012
   

Re: Bradley Beal - Part II 

Post#730 » by AFM » Thu May 1, 2014 9:03 pm

stevemcqueen1 wrote:Beal is better than Harden was at 20. He's going to be better than Harden at 24,

Harden is the best SG in the game only because he's the only All Star caliber SG. For now. Harden is a one way player whose scoring is predicated on flopping and jumping into people and getting bailed out by the refs. Why he's so streaky and why he's typically sucked in the playoffs. He doesn't play defense and they stop calling his BS so much.

He really is a catastrophe on defense too. Houston's perimeter D is an embarrassment and their overall D sucks even though they have Beverly, Asik, and Howard. You wouldn't think that would be possible! Harden breaks their defense.

He's such a lousy iteration of a superstar. In OKC I would credit him as a poor man's Ginobli. In Houston he's a very poor man's Gil. It's like he got depressed and stopped caring about trying to play actual good basketball and win and is only trying to score a ton of points and impress onlookers and make Presti look dumb. I can't stand the way he plays and I am so glad we didn't trade for him.

Truth HOF
He is a fraud of a star IMO
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,779
And1: 9,179
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Bradley Beal - Part II 

Post#731 » by payitforward » Thu May 1, 2014 9:36 pm

Severn Hoos wrote:Just because it's fun to ask the question:

What does the board think about Beal vs. Harden right now? Just on gut feel, do you wish Harden was on this team, rather than Beal?

Through four playoff games, here are the stats:

Harden: 27.5 PPG, .350 FG%, .268 3p%, .871 FT%, 5.3 RPG, 5.5 APG, 1.3 SPG, 4.0 PF, 3.8 TO

Beal: 20.5 PPG, .435 FG%, .500 3p%, .905 FT%, 4.5 RPG, 4.3 APG, 0.8 SPG, 3.3 PF, 0.8 TO

Should we mention Beal's defense? Harden's contract? Their comparative age?

I know it's a ridiculously small sample size, but then Harden has been below .400 FG% in 3 of the 5 seasons he has been in the playoffs.

And if you prefer the Advanced stats, they get even uglier for Harden. He loses on PER (20.5 / 15.1), ORtg (128 / 103), DRtg (111 / 119), and WS/48 (.203 / .023). Oh, and despite being so inefficient (the usual knock on Beal), Harden's Usage rate is 30.5 compared to 21.7 for Beal.

Harden's a great player, but I'm not convinced I would trade Beal straight up for him right now. And 2nd year Beal is light years ahead of 2nd year Harden, IMO. I hope we get to see Beal in a Wiz uniform for a long time to come.

"Just because it's fun to ask" -- ? No... you are making a point not asking a question. And you're making it at a Wizards high point and a Rockets low-ish point. And you're looking at a small sample. And you're using the always-reliable hindsight POV. This was a pre-draft trade, no? What if Charlotte had taken Beal? You like MK-G better than Harden?

This is hindsight-based nose-rubbing, and it's pointless. Like you, I hope we see BB in a Wiz uniform for a long time. But Harden had a far better 2d year than Beal overall. .59 TS% vs. Bradley's .50 -- and either about the same or better at everything else. In fairness, however, he was a year older than Beal. So it makes more sense to compare his rookie year to Beal's second year. It's closer, but Harden was still better.

As soon as Beal actually fulfills his extraordinary potential -- and I have a lot of hope he will -- and becomes as good a player as James Harden, maybe even better, we can crow. Right now that's not the case.

This is independent of the idea of trading one for the other, on the other hand -- Harden costs much more.
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,171
And1: 7,947
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Bradley Beal - Part II 

Post#732 » by Dat2U » Thu May 1, 2014 9:39 pm

stevemcqueen1 wrote:Beal is better than Harden was at 20. He's going to be better than Harden at 24,

Harden is the best SG in the game only because he's the only All Star caliber SG. For now. Harden is a one way player whose scoring is predicated on flopping and jumping into people and getting bailed out by the refs. Why he's so streaky and why he's typically sucked in the playoffs. He doesn't play defense and they stop calling his BS so much.

He really is a catastrophe on defense too. Houston's perimeter D is an embarrassment and their overall D sucks even though they have Beverly, Asik, and Howard. You wouldn't think that would be possible! Harden breaks their defense.

He's such a lousy iteration of a superstar. In OKC I would credit him as a poor man's Ginobli. In Houston he's a very poor man's Gil. It's like he got depressed and stopped caring about trying to play actual good basketball and win and is only trying to score a ton of points and impress onlookers and make Presti look dumb. I can't stand the way he plays and I am so glad we didn't trade for him.


Reading this I would have sworn he did something personally to you. :lol:

I see a lot of opinion and hyperbole but light on actual facts. I think his defense can certainly be criticized but offensively he's one of the top 5 players in the league and I don't think that can really be questioned.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,779
And1: 9,179
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Bradley Beal - Part II 

Post#733 » by payitforward » Thu May 1, 2014 9:39 pm

AFM wrote:
stevemcqueen1 wrote:Beal is better than Harden was at 20. He's going to be better than Harden at 24,

Hope so, but neither of these is exactly an empirical statement, is it?

Harden was in college at 20, so how are you managing the comparison? And we won't know what Beal will be at 24 until he's actually 24 -- or do you have a crystal ball?
mhd
General Manager
Posts: 9,691
And1: 1,708
Joined: Mar 25, 2004

Re: Bradley Beal - Part II 

Post#734 » by mhd » Thu May 1, 2014 10:19 pm

Dat2U wrote:This stuff about Harden being overrated is borderline laughable. A TS% above .600 for 3 straight seasons. A PER over 23 the last two seasons. The guy averages over 5 assists a game from the SG position (LOL at him dominating the ball - he's only doing what's asked of him!). He had an ORtg of 120 this year which is elite considering his high usage. Wall had an ORtg of 106. Beal had an ORtg of 103. DAME!

Defensively he's a sieve. Yes, that definitely needs to be worked on. But it's much easier to hide a weak perimeter player than a low post one.

I pray for the day where Beal can be in the same category of player as Harden is as a 24 yr old RIGHT NOW!



I think Jamison might be a better defender than Harden is. Harden was just flat out LAZY in the playoffs on defense. Is it part of Houston's system?
User avatar
TGW
RealGM
Posts: 13,378
And1: 6,756
Joined: Oct 22, 2010

Re: Bradley Beal - Part II 

Post#735 » by TGW » Thu May 1, 2014 10:34 pm

mhd wrote:
Dat2U wrote:This stuff about Harden being overrated is borderline laughable. A TS% above .600 for 3 straight seasons. A PER over 23 the last two seasons. The guy averages over 5 assists a game from the SG position (LOL at him dominating the ball - he's only doing what's asked of him!). He had an ORtg of 120 this year which is elite considering his high usage. Wall had an ORtg of 106. Beal had an ORtg of 103. DAME!

Defensively he's a sieve. Yes, that definitely needs to be worked on. But it's much easier to hide a weak perimeter player than a low post one.

I pray for the day where Beal can be in the same category of player as Harden is as a 24 yr old RIGHT NOW!



I think Jamison might be a better defender than Harden is. Harden was just flat out LAZY in the playoffs on defense. Is it part of Houston's system?


It might be. No one on Houston (that includes Howard) play good defense. I mean not one.
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 20,597
And1: 5,211
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

Re: Bradley Beal - Part II 

Post#736 » by tontoz » Thu May 1, 2014 11:08 pm

I haven't watched Houston hardly at all but i have seem some commentary from Houston fans. Harden has definitely gotten mixed reviews there. A lot of commentary about his selfishness and total indifference to defense.
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,474
And1: 22,896
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Bradley Beal - Part II 

Post#737 » by nate33 » Fri May 2, 2014 12:19 am

Dat2U wrote:This stuff about Harden being overrated is borderline laughable. A TS% above .600 for 3 straight seasons. A PER over 23 the last two seasons. The guy averages over 5 assists a game from the SG position (LOL at him dominating the ball - he's only doing what's asked of him!). He had an ORtg of 120 this year which is elite considering his high usage. Wall had an ORtg of 106. Beal had an ORtg of 103. DAME!

Defensively he's a sieve. Yes, that definitely needs to be worked on. But it's much easier to hide a weak perimeter player than a low post one.

I pray for the day where Beal can be in the same category of player as Harden is as a 24 yr old RIGHT NOW!

Statistically, there's no denying that Harden is a monster in the regular season. However, I do think there is some substance to the allegation that he's an empty stat guy. His game is predicated on drawing a lot of cheap fouls and those fouls might be a little harder to draw in the playoffs.

I note that, last year, his regular season PER and TS% were 23.0 and .600 respectively. In the playoffs, they dipped to 20.8 and .548. This year his regular season PER and TS% were 23.5 and .618; and in the playoffs, they dipped to 15.2 and .471.

His awful defense is a well-known issue. That can really hurt in the playoffs when attention to detail is paramount.

He is still better than Beal at this point, but he's no Gilbert Arenas, even if his numbers look similar.
User avatar
Kanyewest
RealGM
Posts: 10,453
And1: 2,770
Joined: Jul 05, 2004

Re: Bradley Beal - Part II 

Post#738 » by Kanyewest » Fri May 2, 2014 5:05 pm

Dat2U wrote:
Reading this I would have sworn he did something personally to you. :lol:

I see a lot of opinion and hyperbole but light on actual facts. I think his defense can certainly be criticized but offensively he's one of the top 5 players in the league and I don't think that can really be questioned.


It actually might be pretty close that he's in the top 5. You've got LeBron, Durant, Paul, Curry, and Love. But yeah, he is certainly the best shooting guard offensively in the league.
deneem4
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,917
And1: 1,263
Joined: Dec 26, 2012

Re: Bradley Beal - Part II 

Post#739 » by deneem4 » Sat May 3, 2014 12:45 pm

Harden played with 2 top 10 players for multiple seasons..and was considered as a 3rd option when on the floor... His okc stats isn't fair to compare to Beals because beal always have the best defenders guarding him..
Now harden is a better ball handler and facilitator but I think beal can build on that...he's only 20
Pay your beals....or its lights out!!!
Bron, Bosh, Wade is like Mike, Hakeem, barkley...3 top 5 picks from same draft
mike, hakeem and Barkley on the same team!!!!
Illmatic12
RealGM
Posts: 10,161
And1: 8,459
Joined: Dec 20, 2013
 

Re: Bradley Beal - Part II 

Post#740 » by Illmatic12 » Sat May 3, 2014 1:43 pm

deneem4 wrote:Harden played with 2 top 10 players for multiple seasons..and was considered as a 3rd option when on the floor... His okc stats isn't fair to compare to Beals because beal always have the best defenders guarding him..
Now harden is a better ball handler and facilitator but I think beal can build on that...he's only 20

Harden was a better ballhandler than Beal at age 20. Yeah Harden was overshadowed his first few years, but people forget he was 1st team All-American in college and a 3rd overall pick himself. The guy is/was extremely talented from a young age.

Beal will never have JH ballhandling ability. But Harden will never have Beal's jumpshot, or defense.

Return to Washington Wizards