ImageImage

The Nik Stauskas Thread

Moderators: BigSlam, yosemiteben, fatlever, JDR720, Diop

User avatar
catch20two
RealGM
Posts: 21,424
And1: 4,666
Joined: Nov 04, 2012
       

Re: The Nik Stauskas Thread 

Post#81 » by catch20two » Fri May 23, 2014 1:07 am

ARHornet wrote:
catch20two wrote:
MasterIchiro wrote:
Dude hits 90% from 3 in practice, 44% in games. I expect him to remain the best shooter in this draft. And he can dribble. And he can pass.

LaVine might never learn how to make his teammates better, something Stauskas can step in and do right now. LaVine also may never become a knock down 3 pt shooter. He can dribble better than Stauskas, I'll give him that. But if he doesn't know what to do with the ball, he won't see the light of day on the floor.

Y'all keep tryna compare freshman versions of Lavine and Young to a sophomore version of Stauskas. Stauskas only averaged like 11 a game as a freshman before breaking out this year. Both Young and Lavine would've did the same thing had they stayed another year. Granted, Stauskas is going to be a 40% 3 point shooter but I just don't see him being a 20 ppg player in the league, maybe about 15 in his best years.

I don't think that anyone is arguing with you that Lavine and Young have more potential than Stauskas. But just because they could be better doesn't mean that they will. There is certainly more risk in taking either of them than Stauskas. You are talking like it is a certainty that Lavine and Young will be great while Stauskas will be average.

Naaw, I'm talking from the standpoint of wanting to draft a player that has potential to be better than Kemba and Jefferson. I want that alpha dog player that might lead us to a championship and that's worth the risk to me more than just being able to compete enough to make the 2nd round.
They will wage war against the Lamb but the Lamb will triumph them because he is Lord of lords and King of kings - and with him will be his called, chosen and faithful followers." Revelation 17:14 (NIV)
User avatar
JDR720
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 44,199
And1: 45,799
Joined: Jul 09, 2013
     

Re: The Nik Stauskas Thread 

Post#82 » by JDR720 » Fri May 23, 2014 1:09 am

catch20two wrote:
ARHornet wrote:
catch20two wrote:Y'all keep tryna compare freshman versions of Lavine and Young to a sophomore version of Stauskas. Stauskas only averaged like 11 a game as a freshman before breaking out this year. Both Young and Lavine would've did the same thing had they stayed another year. Granted, Stauskas is going to be a 40% 3 point shooter but I just don't see him being a 20 ppg player in the league, maybe about 15 in his best years.

I don't think that anyone is arguing with you that Lavine and Young have more potential than Stauskas. But just because they could be better doesn't mean that they will. There is certainly more risk in taking either of them than Stauskas. You are talking like it is a certainty that Lavine and Young will be great while Stauskas will be average.

Naaw, I'm talking from the standpoint of wanting to draft a player that has potential to be better than Kemba and Jefferson. I want that alpha dog player that might lead us to a championship and that's worth the risk to me more than just being able to compete enough to make the 2nd round.

Kemba is an alpha dog, get to many alpha dogs on one team and problems will happen
BeesWax
General Manager
Posts: 7,855
And1: 1,660
Joined: Jul 04, 2001
       

Re: The Nik Stauskas Thread 

Post#83 » by BeesWax » Fri May 23, 2014 1:10 am

catch20two wrote:
jdm3 wrote:
catch20two wrote:Y'all keep tryna compare freshman versions of Lavine and Young to a sophomore version of Stauskas. Stauskas only averaged like 11 a game as a freshman before breaking out this year. Both Young and Lavine would've did the same thing had they stayed another year. Granted, Stauskas is going to be a 40% 3 point shooter but I just don't see him being a 20 ppg player in the league, maybe about 15 in his best years.

He scored less but his % was still very good. He could have scored more if he had been more the focus on offense. Burke and Hardaway Jr were the main focuses so Nik took less shots.

He's not going to be the main focus on our team neither. He'll be the 3rd option unless something miraculous happen like he drop a couple 40 point games and then Jefferson and Kemba will have to pass the baton.

So would young. If I am getting a third option I want to guy who shoots better at all areas. Also his handling skills help him rank higher too. May not have as high a ceiling but the floor is lower since he is more ready to be a third option right now.
Spoiler:
Image
Image
User avatar
Eoghan
RealGM
Posts: 11,315
And1: 3,293
Joined: May 20, 2009
         

Re: The Nik Stauskas Thread 

Post#84 » by Eoghan » Fri May 23, 2014 1:16 am

MasterIchiro wrote:
BrotherDave wrote:Pfft, he's no Nik Caner-Medley.

Nah, I'd be cool with Stauskas IF we traded down and got him around 15 or so. But we won't, b/c our FO is tsherkin.


Think the Suns would be interested in trading 14 and 18 for 9?

Maybe? They need a big talent injection to get over the hump and into the WC playoff picture.
User avatar
MasterIchiro
RealGM
Posts: 21,388
And1: 6,845
Joined: Jan 18, 2013
Location: The Dirty Water
       

Re: The Nik Stauskas Thread 

Post#85 » by MasterIchiro » Fri May 23, 2014 1:18 am

BrotherDave wrote:
MasterIchiro wrote:
BrotherDave wrote:Pfft, he's no Nik Caner-Medley.

Nah, I'd be cool with Stauskas IF we traded down and got him around 15 or so. But we won't, b/c our FO is tsherkin.


Think the Suns would be interested in trading 14 and 18 for 9?

Maybe? They need a big talent injection to get over the hump and into the WC playoff picture.


Maybe they like Saric? It will be interesting to see what happens if Saric is there at 9.

What could we do with 14 and 18?

I think we could get LaVine and Young or LaVine/Young and Anderson/Napier. We might could flip Napier for Hardaway Jr.
It has been written...
User avatar
catch20two
RealGM
Posts: 21,424
And1: 4,666
Joined: Nov 04, 2012
       

Re: The Nik Stauskas Thread 

Post#86 » by catch20two » Fri May 23, 2014 1:19 am

JDR720 wrote:
catch20two wrote:
ARHornet wrote:I don't think that anyone is arguing with you that Lavine and Young have more potential than Stauskas. But just because they could be better doesn't mean that they will. There is certainly more risk in taking either of them than Stauskas. You are talking like it is a certainty that Lavine and Young will be great while Stauskas will be average.

Naaw, I'm talking from the standpoint of wanting to draft a player that has potential to be better than Kemba and Jefferson. I want that alpha dog player that might lead us to a championship and that's worth the risk to me more than just being able to compete enough to make the 2nd round.

Kemba is an alpha dog, get to many alpha dogs on one team and problems will happen

Kemba has no problem deferring and being the 2nd or 3rd option. He just want to win.
They will wage war against the Lamb but the Lamb will triumph them because he is Lord of lords and King of kings - and with him will be his called, chosen and faithful followers." Revelation 17:14 (NIV)
User avatar
JDR720
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 44,199
And1: 45,799
Joined: Jul 09, 2013
     

Re: The Nik Stauskas Thread 

Post#87 » by JDR720 » Fri May 23, 2014 1:21 am

I dont think Young is efficient enough to be a #2 scorer, a 40% college shooter (especially on a loaded team with so many weapons) doesn't suddenly become a 45% or better NBA scorer, he will be an inefficient chucker (much worse Paul George)
User avatar
catch20two
RealGM
Posts: 21,424
And1: 4,666
Joined: Nov 04, 2012
       

Re: The Nik Stauskas Thread 

Post#88 » by catch20two » Fri May 23, 2014 1:22 am

jdm3 wrote:
catch20two wrote:
jdm3 wrote:He scored less but his % was still very good. He could have scored more if he had been more the focus on offense. Burke and Hardaway Jr were the main focuses so Nik took less shots.

He's not going to be the main focus on our team neither. He'll be the 3rd option unless something miraculous happen like he drop a couple 40 point games and then Jefferson and Kemba will have to pass the baton.

So would young. If I am getting a third option I want to guy who shoots better at all areas. Also his handling skills help him rank higher too. May not have as high a ceiling but the floor is lower since he is more ready to be a third option right now.

I want the high ceiling. We need top-end talent if we're going to ever be more than a treadmill. I want a player that COULD be more, not the player that WILL be just good enough to surpass.
They will wage war against the Lamb but the Lamb will triumph them because he is Lord of lords and King of kings - and with him will be his called, chosen and faithful followers." Revelation 17:14 (NIV)
BeesWax
General Manager
Posts: 7,855
And1: 1,660
Joined: Jul 04, 2001
       

Re: The Nik Stauskas Thread 

Post#89 » by BeesWax » Fri May 23, 2014 1:25 am

MasterIchiro wrote:
BrotherDave wrote:
MasterIchiro wrote:
Think the Suns would be interested in trading 14 and 18 for 9?

Maybe? They need a big talent injection to get over the hump and into the WC playoff picture.


Maybe they like Saric? It will be interesting to see what happens if Saric is there at 9.

What could we do with 14 and 18?

I think we could get LaVine and Young or LaVine/Young and Anderson/Napier. We might could flip Napier for Hardaway Jr.

I would assume we would package 18 with 24 to try to move up in the draft a little. Maybe Minnesota moves back to add depth as they lose Love.
Spoiler:
Image
Image
ARHornet
Pro Prospect
Posts: 941
And1: 260
Joined: Apr 20, 2014
 

Re: The Nik Stauskas Thread 

Post#90 » by ARHornet » Fri May 23, 2014 1:27 am

catch20two wrote:
jdm3 wrote:
catch20two wrote:He's not going to be the main focus on our team neither. He'll be the 3rd option unless something miraculous happen like he drop a couple 40 point games and then Jefferson and Kemba will have to pass the baton.

So would young. If I am getting a third option I want to guy who shoots better at all areas. Also his handling skills help him rank higher too. May not have as high a ceiling but the floor is lower since he is more ready to be a third option right now.

I want the high ceiling. We need top-end talent if we're going to ever be more than a treadmill. I want a player that COULD be more, not the player that WILL be just good enough to surpass.

I get what you're saying. I just don't believe Young will ever be more than average or that LaVine will ever be more than a very good 6th man. I don't see either one of them as being the guy who leads this team.
BeesWax
General Manager
Posts: 7,855
And1: 1,660
Joined: Jul 04, 2001
       

Re: The Nik Stauskas Thread 

Post#91 » by BeesWax » Fri May 23, 2014 1:28 am

catch20two wrote:
jdm3 wrote:
catch20two wrote:He's not going to be the main focus on our team neither. He'll be the 3rd option unless something miraculous happen like he drop a couple 40 point games and then Jefferson and Kemba will have to pass the baton.

So would young. If I am getting a third option I want to guy who shoots better at all areas. Also his handling skills help him rank higher too. May not have as high a ceiling but the floor is lower since he is more ready to be a third option right now.

I want the high ceiling. We need top-end talent if we're going to ever be more than a treadmill. I want a player that COULD be more, not the player that WILL be just good enough to surpass.

The problem is where Young's ceiling is say an 8.5 and Nik's is 8 the floors are 5 and 7 respectively. Nik is going to be a player in the league for a decade because of all his skills. Young will not last that long unless he develops the basketball skills to last. Young has gotten by on size and athletic ability where Nik has worked on the craft. I won't mind Young at 9 but I think Nik is the better pick because we know he is a player and if they both max out the difference isn't even that much.
Spoiler:
Image
Image
User avatar
catch20two
RealGM
Posts: 21,424
And1: 4,666
Joined: Nov 04, 2012
       

Re: The Nik Stauskas Thread 

Post#92 » by catch20two » Fri May 23, 2014 1:33 am

jdm3 wrote:
catch20two wrote:
jdm3 wrote:So would young. If I am getting a third option I want to guy who shoots better at all areas. Also his handling skills help him rank higher too. May not have as high a ceiling but the floor is lower since he is more ready to be a third option right now.

I want the high ceiling. We need top-end talent if we're going to ever be more than a treadmill. I want a player that COULD be more, not the player that WILL be just good enough to surpass.

The problem is where Young's ceiling is say an 8.5 and Nik's is 8 the floors are 5 and 7 respectively. Nik is going to be a player in the league for a decade because of all his skills. Young will not last that long unless he develops the basketball skills to last. Young has gotten by on size and athletic ability where Nik has worked on the craft. I won't mind Young at 9 but I think Nik is the better pick because we know he is a player and if they both max out the difference isn't even that much.

Lol. Y'all act like Young can't shoot as if he on some MKG sh*t. Young is a legit deep threat. He has similar numbers to Michael Redd coming out of college.
They will wage war against the Lamb but the Lamb will triumph them because he is Lord of lords and King of kings - and with him will be his called, chosen and faithful followers." Revelation 17:14 (NIV)
User avatar
JDR720
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 44,199
And1: 45,799
Joined: Jul 09, 2013
     

Re: The Nik Stauskas Thread 

Post#93 » by JDR720 » Fri May 23, 2014 1:40 am

catch20two wrote:
jdm3 wrote:
catch20two wrote:I want the high ceiling. We need top-end talent if we're going to ever be more than a treadmill. I want a player that COULD be more, not the player that WILL be just good enough to surpass.

The problem is where Young's ceiling is say an 8.5 and Nik's is 8 the floors are 5 and 7 respectively. Nik is going to be a player in the league for a decade because of all his skills. Young will not last that long unless he develops the basketball skills to last. Young has gotten by on size and athletic ability where Nik has worked on the craft. I won't mind Young at 9 but I think Nik is the better pick because we know he is a player and if they both max out the difference isn't even that much.

Lol. Y'all act like Young can't shoot as if he on some MKG sh*t. Young is a legit deep threat. He has similar numbers to Michael Redd coming out of college.

Nik has similar shooting numbers to Ray Allen coming out of college
BeesWax
General Manager
Posts: 7,855
And1: 1,660
Joined: Jul 04, 2001
       

Re: The Nik Stauskas Thread 

Post#94 » by BeesWax » Fri May 23, 2014 1:43 am

catch20two wrote:
jdm3 wrote:
catch20two wrote:I want the high ceiling. We need top-end talent if we're going to ever be more than a treadmill. I want a player that COULD be more, not the player that WILL be just good enough to surpass.

The problem is where Young's ceiling is say an 8.5 and Nik's is 8 the floors are 5 and 7 respectively. Nik is going to be a player in the league for a decade because of all his skills. Young will not last that long unless he develops the basketball skills to last. Young has gotten by on size and athletic ability where Nik has worked on the craft. I won't mind Young at 9 but I think Nik is the better pick because we know he is a player and if they both max out the difference isn't even that much.

Lol. Y'all act like Young can't shoot as if he on some MKG sh*t. Young is a legit deep threat. He has similar numbers to Michael Redd coming out of college.

Again not acting like anything. One guy has proven in two years to be a very good shooter and the other has put of middle of the road numbers. Young may shoot very well and may work very hard to get there or he could be a 35% 3pt shooter for his career. Not bad but not great either. I want to proven better player is all I am saying and Nik has proven to do what we need better than Young so far.
Spoiler:
Image
Image
User avatar
catch20two
RealGM
Posts: 21,424
And1: 4,666
Joined: Nov 04, 2012
       

Re: The Nik Stauskas Thread 

Post#95 » by catch20two » Fri May 23, 2014 1:43 am

JDR720 wrote:
catch20two wrote:
jdm3 wrote:The problem is where Young's ceiling is say an 8.5 and Nik's is 8 the floors are 5 and 7 respectively. Nik is going to be a player in the league for a decade because of all his skills. Young will not last that long unless he develops the basketball skills to last. Young has gotten by on size and athletic ability where Nik has worked on the craft. I won't mind Young at 9 but I think Nik is the better pick because we know he is a player and if they both max out the difference isn't even that much.

Lol. Y'all act like Young can't shoot as if he on some MKG sh*t. Young is a legit deep threat. He has similar numbers to Michael Redd coming out of college.

Nik has similar shooting numbers to Ray Allen coming out of college

So did McLemore.
They will wage war against the Lamb but the Lamb will triumph them because he is Lord of lords and King of kings - and with him will be his called, chosen and faithful followers." Revelation 17:14 (NIV)
User avatar
JDR720
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 44,199
And1: 45,799
Joined: Jul 09, 2013
     

Re: The Nik Stauskas Thread 

Post#96 » by JDR720 » Fri May 23, 2014 1:44 am

catch20two wrote:
JDR720 wrote:
catch20two wrote:Lol. Y'all act like Young can't shoot as if he on some MKG sh*t. Young is a legit deep threat. He has similar numbers to Michael Redd coming out of college.

Nik has similar shooting numbers to Ray Allen coming out of college

So did McLemore.

the difference in McLemore and Nik is Nik can actually dribble a ball and attack the rim
ARHornet
Pro Prospect
Posts: 941
And1: 260
Joined: Apr 20, 2014
 

Re: The Nik Stauskas Thread 

Post#97 » by ARHornet » Fri May 23, 2014 1:44 am

catch20two wrote:
jdm3 wrote:
catch20two wrote:I want the high ceiling. We need top-end talent if we're going to ever be more than a treadmill. I want a player that COULD be more, not the player that WILL be just good enough to surpass.

The problem is where Young's ceiling is say an 8.5 and Nik's is 8 the floors are 5 and 7 respectively. Nik is going to be a player in the league for a decade because of all his skills. Young will not last that long unless he develops the basketball skills to last. Young has gotten by on size and athletic ability where Nik has worked on the craft. I won't mind Young at 9 but I think Nik is the better pick because we know he is a player and if they both max out the difference isn't even that much.

Lol. Y'all act like Young can't shoot as if he on some MKG sh*t. Young is a legit deep threat. He has similar numbers to Michael Redd coming out of college.

Young got hot towards the end of the season and in the tournament. For a large portion of the regular season he was awful. He's can shoot, no doubting that. But he was inconsistent. That's a concern.
User avatar
catch20two
RealGM
Posts: 21,424
And1: 4,666
Joined: Nov 04, 2012
       

Re: The Nik Stauskas Thread 

Post#98 » by catch20two » Fri May 23, 2014 1:46 am

I give up on this back and forth because I hear y'all argument. Y'all argument is that Stauskas is going to shoot lights out and that's almost guaranteed in which I agree. My argument is that he's not the player that's going to put us over the hump.
They will wage war against the Lamb but the Lamb will triumph them because he is Lord of lords and King of kings - and with him will be his called, chosen and faithful followers." Revelation 17:14 (NIV)
User avatar
Liver_Pooty
RealGM
Posts: 40,767
And1: 16,749
Joined: Dec 29, 2008
Location: Asheville, NC
   

Re: The Nik Stauskas Thread 

Post#99 » by Liver_Pooty » Fri May 23, 2014 1:49 am

catch20two wrote:I give up on this back and forth because I hear y'all argument. Y'all argument is that Stauskas is going to shoot lights out and that's almost guaranteed in which I agree. My argument is that he's not the player that's going to put us over the hump.


I don't think there is a player at 9 that is going to put us over the hump. I believe that player will come in FA.
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.
StitchJones
Senior
Posts: 702
And1: 233
Joined: Mar 29, 2006

Re: The Nik Stauskas Thread 

Post#100 » by StitchJones » Fri May 23, 2014 3:41 am

I think Stauskas could a be a Klay Thompson like player. The question is if his handles and quick release transition. If they do he could be a very good scorer in the NBA. Cho and company will have to determine this in workouts. As far as Lavine, I don't think i would take him with the number 9 pick. He's going to take a few years to become what people think he could be. If we can trade up about 5 spots from 24, then I think he will be there. in that case you can take either Gordon or Randle as I think one of them is going to fall to 9.

Return to Charlotte Hornets