SupremeHustle wrote:
Momma, there goes that man again!
Zach LaVine in case you can't tell.

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis
SupremeHustle wrote:
Momma, there goes that man again!
Zach LaVine in case you can't tell.
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
giraldo5 wrote:JayMKE wrote:buckboy wrote:
And that was against 3' tall guards.
The agenda driven idiocy of some on this board is astounding, one bad game is so relevant to proving why the player they don't like sucks but they don't have the self awareness of knowing that the player they like laid some pretty big turds as well. Single games mean pretty much jack squat and there is no consistency with you guys that do this either.
The post went way over your head apparently. Or you just didn't read the thread where Wise discounted Wiggins 39 pt game vs West Virginia because there midget Defenders were so bad that even Wise1 "could put up 40 vs them". Yet his guy laid an egg vs them.
Sneakerpants wrote:Watching both Exum and Smart highlights, it's hard for me to say that Exum is definitely a better prospect. What type of performance would Smart put up against 17 year old Australian kids?
.
Baddy Chuck wrote:I want to win but I also love chaos.
JayMKE wrote:The agenda driven idiocy of some on this board is astounding, one bad game is so relevant to proving why the player they don't like sucks but they don't have the self awareness of knowing that the player they like laid some pretty big turds as well. Single games mean pretty much jack squat and there is no consistency with you guys that do this either.
JayMKE wrote:giraldo5 wrote:JayMKE wrote:
The agenda driven idiocy of some on this board is astounding, one bad game is so relevant to proving why the player they don't like sucks but they don't have the self awareness of knowing that the player they like laid some pretty big turds as well. Single games mean pretty much jack squat and there is no consistency with you guys that do this either.
The post went way over your head apparently. Or you just didn't read the thread where Wise discounted Wiggins 39 pt game vs West Virginia because there midget Defenders were so bad that even Wise1 "could put up 40 vs them". Yet his guy laid an egg vs them.
My bad then, I'm just getting tired of seeing people scream about the Mercer game with Parker thought you were doing the same with Smart. I really don't think you can read much into single games, everybody can have a good game. The good ones are more interesting since you see what a player is capable of at least but even then you got to look at the whole picture.
Sneakerpants wrote:Watching both Exum and Smart highlights, it's hard for me to say that Exum is definitely a better prospect. What type of performance would Smart put up against 17 year old Australian kids?
Point guards are so hard to scout. Everybody wanted Marvin Williams who wasn't a college starter over Chris Paul, just as an example of how hard it is to know what you've got in a PG. I wouldn't want either guard in the top 3, but would be ecstatic to pick up either through other means.
emunney wrote:
We need a man shaped like a chicken nugget with the shot selection of a 21st birthday party.
GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:
if you combined jabari parker, royal ivey, a shrimp and a ball sack youd have javon carter
Baddy Chuck wrote:I want to win but I also love chaos.
AussieBuck wrote:Sneakerpants wrote:Watching both Exum and Smart highlights, it's hard for me to say that Exum is definitely a better prospect. What type of performance would Smart put up against 17 year old Australian kids?
Point guards are so hard to scout. Everybody wanted Marvin Williams who wasn't a college starter over Chris Paul, just as an example of how hard it is to know what you've got in a PG. I wouldn't want either guard in the top 3, but would be ecstatic to pick up either through other means.
Do you actually believe that Exum is a top pick because he dominates high school games?
Zeezprah wrote:not to mention, "scouting" from highlight tapes
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
emunney wrote:
We need a man shaped like a chicken nugget with the shot selection of a 21st birthday party.
GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:
if you combined jabari parker, royal ivey, a shrimp and a ball sack youd have javon carter
JayMKE wrote:buckboy wrote:giraldo5 wrote:
http://espn.go.com/ncb/boxscore?gameId=400498367
And that was against 3' tall guards.
The agenda driven idiocy of some on this board is astounding, one bad game is so relevant to proving why the player they don't like sucks but they don't have the self awareness of knowing that the player they like laid some pretty big turds as well. Single games mean pretty much jack squat and there is no consistency with you guys that do this either.
Zeezprah wrote:reading bucks status comments on facebook make me cringe hard
Baddy Chuck wrote:College competition is hardly a great judgement tool either.
EastSideBucksFan wrote:At some point this board is going to have to drop their stupid bullsht agendas and just enjoy the team for once.
Baddy Chuck wrote:College competition is hardly a great judgement tool either.
emunney wrote:Ron Swanson wrote: 9 YEARS!? like any of that matters
THAT LITERALLY IS HIS TENURE.