nate33 wrote:Bump!
With all the max money available to teams this offseason, it's a pretty sure bet that Wall would have been offered the full max from someone. In hindsight, I'd say the decision to extend Wall to a max contract was the right one. Thoughts?
I thought at the time it was a good idea for the Zards to offer Wall the max. Fact is, he was going to be offered the max (or very close to it) this offseason by either the Zards or another team.
If the Zards had not offered Wall the max last season, the team would be sending him the signal that it's not sure that he's their franchise player. While others may disagree, I think it's smart not to play those kind of head games with a player who is probably your most valuable asset, especially when you're almost certain to offer him the max (or close to it) the very next offseason.