BurningHeart wrote:aIvin adams wrote:BurningHeart wrote:Frankly, I think it's pathetic that teams are basically ceding control to players in the NBA.
In no other sport do the inmates run the asylum. It's a big reason why the NBA is not *nearly* as likable as it was even 10 years ago.
i identify more with the players than with the owners, personally.
it would be one thing if i felt like the team belonged to the fans, but after the last lockout i felt like the owners were the bad guys. so i dont mind the players having so much influence at all.
But they're the owners. Management manages. Players play. If LeBron wants to be a GM, let him retire and be one. Teams shouldn't be held hostage by players.
oh i see.
i guess it comes down to: how good does LBJ think his judgment is? if i were LBJ, i might think that my judgment about managing a roster was about avg compared to the GMs in the league.
and even if i thought my judgment about how to manage wasn't as good as most GMs, i still might trust my judgment because you never know what goals/obstacles a GM is considering other than 'goal: win a championship.' for example, an owner who plans on selling the franchise for a billion dollars in a cpl years might tell his GM, 'give me as competitive a roster as you can in 2016 with no bad contracts. prioritize marketability.' if I'm LBJ, i don't give a hoot about the sales price of yer franchise in 2016, i would want my max salary + maximum opportunity to win (maybe). and since my interests and the owners interests don't align perfectly, it would make sense if i used my leverage to get what I want.
and in this example, LBJ's objectives might align more closely with the franchise fan's objectives.
LBJ might be wondering whether Miami's ownership is all in. i dunno..




















