Rescuing CFs sub discussion and combining these posts:
coldfish wrote:If the Bulls don't get Melo, that's disappointing but not the end of the world. I didn't expect it. For the love of all that is good and holy though, can we drop the whole "flexibility" thing? Please? Can we just try to put the best team possible on the court now? No maneuvering for capspace that will amount to nothing. No dumping players for assets that won't be used. I don't want the Bulls to trade future firsts for bad players or take on awful contracts. They don't have to be Brooklyn stupid.
Just: Let's try to put the best team we can on the court.
I just don't ever want to see another Bulls team where most of the money on the roster is going to people who are there for the sake of "future flexibility".
MnM24 wrote:http://www.csnchicago.com/bulls/bulls-strategy-crucial-anthonys-tour-winds-down
The idea of a deeper, well-rounded squad, while not the big splash many Bulls fans are hoping for this summer, is appealing because of the success of the San Antonio Spurs, who used that model to defeat the star-studded Miami Heat in June’s NBA Finals.
Agree, and yet the problem here is that a "well rounded club like the Spurs" takes actually ***good players*** and not just any random player trying hard.
Unfortunately there is a lot of confusion about what is actually a good player, whether from fanbaes or even Front Offices. If we think a Marco Belinelli level guys is such, we are wrong by and large. Instructive to note that despite his reformation in SA he barely got on the court during the Finals.
There is no substituting for real talent.