IndianPlaya17 wrote:If the Bulls sign Mirotic can they use him in a S&T with the Knicks?
Only if they're signing him specificially to be used in a sign-and-trade, which isn't happening.
Moderators: HomoSapien, Ice Man, Michael Jackson, dougthonus, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10
IndianPlaya17 wrote:If the Bulls sign Mirotic can they use him in a S&T with the Knicks?
Knicksfan20 wrote:coldfish wrote:Knicksfan20 wrote:Gotcha Coldfish. My mistake. I understand now.
Still... Gibson is the best player out of the group i mentioned. IF we Signed and traded Melo to you, you keep Gibson.
But again, in my offers you wouldnt be gutting your team. You still would have the majority of last years team still in tact.
If you wanted to keep Brewer, trade us Mirotic instead along with MCD.
Keep brewer and Taj and you guys are still a top defensive team. I honestly dont want Mirotic. I think he is another Euro stiff who can shoot. But he has some value.
As I noted before, we are in the theoretical phase of this thread. All signs right now are pointing to him not wanting to give up the 5/130.
That said, I think your trade is just a little too much. I agree about several of the things you are saying and I have argued for them myself on this board. Sign and trade is better than dumping Gibson by a lot. However, I think you are asking for more than the value of Taj Gibson.
How? What if both Mirotic and MCD are busts? Your a team that is on the cusp of competing for a championship... DO you really want to do that by breaking up your core that got you there?
kulaz3000 wrote:coldfish wrote:kulaz3000 wrote:Not to be a debby downer, and I hope I'm wrong, but my hunch is that the Bulls know that Melo isn't coming and due to this they have now proceeded with bringing over Mirotic who will cut into our cap space once we dump Boozer.
It's just the feeling I get with this sudden news that Mirotic has now been officially bought out, it almost seems to be that it's a signal that the Bulls front office is going into phase 2 of their off season plans and have closed the door on their hopes of signing Melo.
I hope I'm wrong though.
They could trade his rights to NY. There is now no doubt that NY could sign him. The whole "he will only play for Chicago" narrative is gone. Whomever has his rights will have him on their team.
As I said, it's the timing of it that has made me skeptical but you and others are right, perhaps it's the opposite, maybe Phil and our front office have come to terms on a sign and trade that involves Mirotic thus the news of his buy out.
I'm cautiously positive still, but as a Bulls fan we've been let down so many times, I'm jaded.
Knicksfan20 wrote:coldfish wrote:Knicksfan20 wrote:Gotcha Coldfish. My mistake. I understand now.
Still... Gibson is the best player out of the group i mentioned. IF we Signed and traded Melo to you, you keep Gibson.
But again, in my offers you wouldnt be gutting your team. You still would have the majority of last years team still in tact.
If you wanted to keep Brewer, trade us Mirotic instead along with MCD.
Keep brewer and Taj and you guys are still a top defensive team. I honestly dont want Mirotic. I think he is another Euro stiff who can shoot. But he has some value.
As I noted before, we are in the theoretical phase of this thread. All signs right now are pointing to him not wanting to give up the 5/130.
That said, I think your trade is just a little too much. I agree about several of the things you are saying and I have argued for them myself on this board. Sign and trade is better than dumping Gibson by a lot. However, I think you are asking for more than the value of Taj Gibson.
How? What if both Mirotic and MCD are busts? Your a team that is on the cusp of competing for a championship... DO you really want to do that by breaking up your core that got you there?
Red Larrivee wrote:IndianPlaya17 wrote:If the Bulls sign Mirotic can they use him in a S&T with the Knicks?
Only if they're signing him specificially to be used in a sign-and-trade, which isn't happening.
IndianPlaya17 wrote:How are you so sure of this?
MisterRoy wrote:chifan1798 wrote:Yeah, I've been thinking about this for a while now, because people are always saying, he isn't going to leave that $30 mil on the table, but then I realized, well, one contract is over 5 years, and the other is over 4. Melo's subsequent contract won't start at $30 (if he came here for 4 years), but I'm sure it would still be a hefty chunk of money......say for instance, about 20 mil, which would mean, in the end, he may only leave about 10 mil on the table. the risk would be if he suffered some type of major injury at that particular time, then the team would be less likely to give him another huge contract.
I'm almost wondering if it doesn't work out better that he sign the 4 year deal.....because then he can re-up when he is 33 years old, as opposed to 34. Maybe at 33, he's more likely to get a longer and higher paying final contract?
The argument would be the guaranteed money in that 5th year. However, there has to be off-court stuff that would more than make up for that.
Gotta think he's gonna sell a whole let more shoes in Chicago with the Jordan brand than in NY.
wonderboy2 wrote:Knicksfan20 wrote:coldfish wrote:
As I noted before, we are in the theoretical phase of this thread. All signs right now are pointing to him not wanting to give up the 5/130.
That said, I think your trade is just a little too much. I agree about several of the things you are saying and I have argued for them myself on this board. Sign and trade is better than dumping Gibson by a lot. However, I think you are asking for more than the value of Taj Gibson.
How? What if both Mirotic and MCD are busts? Your a team that is on the cusp of competing for a championship... DO you really want to do that by breaking up your core that got you there?
Tbh it was said last week by a poster in the Mirotic thread that he expects Mirotic to be bought out on July 4 and for the bulls to start negotiating his contract on that day. I forgot the reason behind it but it was the plan all along it seems.
punkmodafunk wrote:We can still trade Mirotic's rights without actually sign him, right?
punkmodafunk wrote:We can still trade Mirotic's rights without actually sign him, right?
Red Larrivee wrote:IndianPlaya17 wrote:How are you so sure of this?
Because Chicago isn't going to give up valuable players in a sign-and-trade if Carmelo commits. They would have the leverage. They wouldn't have leverage if Melo went up to the Knicks and said "I'm not taking your money, sign-and-trade me to Chicago or Houston, I don't care which." Then, things become different.
Sign-and-trade contracts are different from regular contracts. The writing in the contract makes it so the deal becomes null if the sign-and-trade doesn't happen within a certain window. If Chicago isn't negotiating a contract with Mirotic to be used with Melo, then he's not getting traded.
Vuc N Pek wrote:According to one of my source, Mirotic buyout should be finalized by 4th July but considering thats national holiday there in USA, it might be adjusted for few days, anyway expect buyout to be completed soon, there is like 90% chance that Mirotic will come over and play next season in NBA.

Red Larrivee wrote:punkmodafunk wrote:We can still trade Mirotic's rights without actually sign him, right?
Yes, but the fact that we're actually negotiating with him to sign a deal suggests otherwise.
IrishBeatdown wrote:Vuc N Pek wrote:According to one of my source, Mirotic buyout should be finalized by 4th July but considering thats national holiday there in USA, it might be adjusted for few days, anyway expect buyout to be completed soon, there is like 90% chance that Mirotic will come over and play next season in NBA.
Vuc N Pek called this one, was all over it, called it a week ago. When he called it a week ago, not sure that you can claim the bulls are shifting into plan B. It was always going to be July 4. This was all part of the plan.
What this plan ends up being I don't have a clue. The mad scientists are at work.

IcemanGervin wrote:Well my worst fears are coming to light now. McDermott and Mirotic are nice pieces for sure, but unproven as they get and we still are searching for that second ball handler scorer like it is the holy grail.