Wormwood74 wrote:So we're letting Channing Frye walk. Think about what this means:
1. We're down to one true PF on the team (Markieff)
2. We let our best net +/- per 48 guy go, who also made Dragic much better on the court...
3. We don't have a stretch 4, but our offense demonstrably needs one (a lot), especially given has the range of a 100 lb shot put
4. We drafted a true PG
5. Letting Frye go creates enough cap space that we can sign a max FA, and absorb a max contract if we trade someone else away...
6. McD is a numbers guy, he knows exactly what letting Frye walk costs us in terms of on court performance
All of this makes sense if we're planning on trading Dragic or Bledsoe for Love, and we're planning on signing a max deal player like LeBron. Either McD is taking a huge risk (because what if those deals don't happen? Then we have a giant hole at PF, tons of unused cap space, and the team probably got worse) or he's pretty sure he's got some things lined up that are probably a done deal.
Given how quiet things have been, I think the insider rumors that the Suns have something HUGE lined up that makes us a ridiculous team to play against is probably true. A starting five of Plumlee, Love, LeBron, Green, and Bledsoe with a very deep bench is frightening.
At a minimum, I think we have a KLove deal in place. The moves don't make sense otherwise.
Not saying you are wrong but Frye and any other move may not have any thing to do with the other
Letting Frye go to Orlando might just have been smart business - not going to pay 8m per year for the player
Frye was a good payer - but I was thinking closer to 5m for three years and not 8m for 4
Suns CANNOT repeat 2010 and sign average players to long term deals just to be busy
One year deals, even if you overpay by a million or two - fine. But don't give up long term cap space





















