Xsy wrote:Your assessment on his passing and playmaking is wrong, period, but you are right about his strength and inexperience being real weaknesses.
But even with those weakness, the fact still remains-- he's barely 19 years old, has a good handle, great passing instinct, and is 6'6". He will get stronger, and he will become experienced. Like, these aren't even ifs. He will literally get stronger as he gets older, and he will literally become experienced.
The jumpshot still has me worried. My optimism in this area is that his pre-draft footage showed us a very flat, ugly shot. Summer league, while he was still missing a lot, showed us a much improved arc and form. So hopefully that'll progress nicely as he gets older.
I really don't expect him to make real noise for a while, but I hardly expect him to bust, either. Unless he really injures himself, he has too many physical gifts to fail completely for a fifth pick.
I was answering a "look at Summer League only" argument with "look at the draft reports only" argument. Looking at them separately will make any prediction look skewed. I wasn't implying I think Exum has no PG skills..
Exum's pre-draft footage and scouting reports really indicated to me that he's is a more of a slashing combo guard than anything. Many reports looked at Exum, before he announced he was definitely a PG, as a SG/PG with above average ball handling and decent passing abilities. His passing and playmaking game is definitely above average for a guard. However that's way different than saying he's primed to make the move to a full time PG.
I said in my first post I didn't see him as a "gifted" passer/playmaker. But gifted =/= capable. I see Dante working as a combo guard type player, rather than a playmaking/offense running PG.
Dante's SL play isn't something to gloss over, but I still have my doubts because again-- playing PG exclusively when you've been kind of a generalist guard is anything but a cakewalk. I think the odds are stacked against him because the learning curve in the NBA for PGs is sharper than for big men. You don't get as many opportunities to mess up. You're the coach on the floor. When the PG makes mistakes it's different than when a Center finds himself in foul trouble or rotating sloppily.
YouMustBeJoakim wrote:I'm sure you were waiting for someone to mention Summer league. We can't assess skill-sets in games where he finally played against NBA talent? Let's just throw away McDermott's SL then.
But you said he wasn't a playmaker, even though this was his #1 asset as a prospect. His driving and dishing (along with his defense) is why he was considered the top PG prospect this year, over Lavine, Smart, and Payton.
The difference between McDermott's showing in the SL and Dante's, is that you can find tapes and tapes of McD doing the exact same thing throughout his college career. He sinks the same shots and makes the same "coach's son" plays that he's been known to make.
With Dante, he's trying to define his position and focus on an aspects of his game that havn't been refined. I don't mean to take away from his ability to drive and dish-- as this has become the hallmark of this generation's scoring PGs. If anything Dante has some very unique traits, with his quickness, high IQ, and intangibles.
If Exum had said he's a slash and pass combo guard, over saying he's a PG I'd be less inclined to feel he's going to bust. Learning to be a PG is probably the hardest thing you can do as a developing player. I disagree that his best asset is his playmaking, I think his best assets are his quickness, handle, and scoring instincts.
As soon as he defined himself as a PG, and was drafted as a PG, I think he's pigeonholed himself into somewhat of a make or break situation.