rookies: best, sleeper, bust

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

Nowitness
General Manager
Posts: 7,978
And1: 4,439
Joined: Jun 23, 2012
   

Re: rookies: best, sleeper, bust 

Post#61 » by Nowitness » Tue Aug 12, 2014 9:09 pm

DuckIII wrote:
MavsManiac4Life wrote:Bust: Bust (Like Lintendre said, don't think he'll be a true bust, but I'm doubting he reaches his absolute ceiling/what people think he'll be at his peak)


Being named Bust probably doesn't help his chances.


Lol, my bad, meant to put Wiggins and just wrote the last thing I'd read.
Nowitnessing a legend
User avatar
DoubleLintendre
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,334
And1: 8,654
Joined: Jul 15, 2012
 

Re: rookies: best, sleeper, bust 

Post#62 » by DoubleLintendre » Tue Aug 12, 2014 9:17 pm

YouMustBeJoakim wrote:
DoubleLintendre wrote:I saved the best for last. I think Gordon and Exum are going to megabust. Gordon will be a forever raw hustle athlete that can't seem to find an offensive/defensive identity, even though he'll be a good role playing rebounder. Exum, Mr. Lightning first step, says he's a PG, but isn't a gifted passer or playmaker. He doesn't really have a good shot either. So, he's a really frail 6'6 PG that can't do PG things, shoot, or finish at the rim through any contact.

That honestly sounds like the definition of a bust, "post-busting". I like the character of the guy and I like what he could become (Penny Hardaway 2).. but his ceiling's height isn't nearly as low as his floor's depth. I won't change my opinion of him until I see him develop in the direction of the hype. He has literally only ONE quality right now.. a great first step. Maybe 2. He has a great video game name.



These are pretty baseless comments. Finishing at the rim was one of his strengths pre-draft according to scouts.

And some of his passes in SL were special -- great timing and touch.


So the right base for for predicting Exum's talents is just from summer league? You must be joakim.

I saw plenty of tape on Exum predraft, and I did not see any notable PG abilities in there. I saw a tweenerish guard with a good step and good handle who could finish on smaller competition and take it to the hole quickly off the dribble.

One of Exum's weaknesses is that he's not very strong, it will be much harder for him to finish against bigger athletes than it has been for him playing in Australia.
tranjSAIC
Banned User
Posts: 4,711
And1: 527
Joined: Nov 18, 2004
Location: orlando
Contact:

Re: rookies: best, sleeper, bust 

Post#63 » by tranjSAIC » Tue Aug 12, 2014 9:23 pm

j-ragg wrote:Shocking so far that most people have picked their team's rookie to be the best/sleeper.

Not counting Bruno, in that case it's probably true.

I'm a Magic fan and I can get on the Gordon bust wagon, hopefully I'm wrong, but how often do tweeners work out?!
User avatar
j-ragg
RealGM
Posts: 18,332
And1: 11,680
Joined: Mar 31, 2005
Location: the don't re-sign Hedo bandwagon.
   

Re: rookies: best, sleeper, bust 

Post#64 » by j-ragg » Tue Aug 12, 2014 9:24 pm

tranjSAIC wrote:
j-ragg wrote:Shocking so far that most people have picked their team's rookie to be the best/sleeper.

Not counting Bruno, in that case it's probably true.

I'm a Magic fan and I can get on the Gordon bust wagon, hopefully I'm wrong, but how often do tweeners work out?!

I totally agree, I can see why people would think he might be a bust. I don't, but I'm not upset. He's in the same boat as Exum (even thought Exum gets way more love for some reason) as a high risk high reward player.
BadMofoPimp wrote:Durant thinks Vooch is one of the Best Centers in the NBA. I will take his word over a couch-GM yelling at a TV.
tranjSAIC
Banned User
Posts: 4,711
And1: 527
Joined: Nov 18, 2004
Location: orlando
Contact:

Re: rookies: best, sleeper, bust 

Post#65 » by tranjSAIC » Tue Aug 12, 2014 9:27 pm

j-ragg wrote:
tranjSAIC wrote:
j-ragg wrote:Shocking so far that most people have picked their team's rookie to be the best/sleeper.

Not counting Bruno, in that case it's probably true.

I'm a Magic fan and I can get on the Gordon bust wagon, hopefully I'm wrong, but how often do tweeners work out?!

I totally agree, I can see why people would think he might be a bust. I don't, but I'm not upset. He's in the same boat as Exum (even thought Exum gets way more love for some reason) as a high risk high reward player.

When I watch Exum, he just has that "look" kind of like Giannis last year. Sure he didn't put up the raw stats you want, but the way he did it, looks like he COULD develop one day to a star.

I don't see any of that in Gordon at all, IF he reaches his potential I could see a Super Duper ROLE PLAYER.
andyo
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,341
And1: 447
Joined: Aug 18, 2006
 

Re: rookies: best, sleeper, bust 

Post#66 » by andyo » Tue Aug 12, 2014 9:27 pm

Long term:

Best: Wiggins
Bust: Gordon, Napier
Sleeper: Bruno
User avatar
The Bandit
Junior
Posts: 317
And1: 164
Joined: Oct 02, 2007

Re: rookies: best, sleeper, bust 

Post#67 » by The Bandit » Tue Aug 12, 2014 9:30 pm

Best - Embiid seems the easy choice here, all dependent on health.

Sleeper - Mitch McGary should be productive and Kyle Anderson could well surprise a few people.

Bust - Gordon - although it seems nobody's expecting much out of him, so perhaps he'll actually exceed expectations. Lavine - just an athlete.
tranjSAIC
Banned User
Posts: 4,711
And1: 527
Joined: Nov 18, 2004
Location: orlando
Contact:

Re: rookies: best, sleeper, bust 

Post#68 » by tranjSAIC » Tue Aug 12, 2014 9:30 pm

Best: Wiggins, I think his ceiling is so high, plus he will be the franchise player now. AND he has a PG who has elite passing skills.

Bust: Gordon, won't live up to the high draft spot. Embiid, only because he will always be injuried

Sleeper: Payton, he looks like a good floor general, if he could ever develop a legit J, watch out
xdsx
Freshman
Posts: 73
And1: 49
Joined: Jan 31, 2011

Re: rookies: best, sleeper, bust 

Post#69 » by xdsx » Tue Aug 12, 2014 9:33 pm

For this season:

Best - Nerlens Noel. Probably the most impressive player in Summer League this year.
Bust - Aaron Gordon. Gonna be tough to find a spot in today's NBA when you can't hit free throws.
Sleeper - Kostas Papanikolaou. A tall shooter with a quick release who has a chance to excel playing alongside Harden and Howard if they decide to use him more like Kyle Korver and less like Steve Novak.
rudyrudy
Sophomore
Posts: 116
And1: 48
Joined: Jun 14, 2012

Re: rookies: best, sleeper, bust 

Post#70 » by rudyrudy » Tue Aug 12, 2014 9:36 pm

Best - Jabari, Emblid, Smart
Sleeper - Harris
Bust - Exum (i think this one so obvious)
JB2
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,824
And1: 7,643
Joined: Mar 10, 2009

Re: rookies: best, sleeper, bust 

Post#71 » by JB2 » Tue Aug 12, 2014 9:38 pm

Sleepers: Julius Randle, James Young, Rodney Hood, Z.Lavine, Nick Johnson, Jordan Clarkson, Early, GRIII

I'm a Laker fan so maybe there is a bit of over optimism with Julius, but I see a truly unique player. If you look strictly on paper (both indv. stats and team W/L), he probably had the best college season out of the other freshmen and I'd say has the safest floor. Worst case I see a solid starter. Best case, he can be devastating. He's going to have to learn to use his unique combo of skill, speed, size and power but if he does I see a really good player. First order of biz, develop a reliable jumper.
User avatar
Xsy
Analyst
Posts: 3,012
And1: 2,266
Joined: Aug 22, 2010
 

Re: rookies: best, sleeper, bust 

Post#72 » by Xsy » Tue Aug 12, 2014 9:39 pm

DoubleLintendre wrote:
YouMustBeJoakim wrote:
DoubleLintendre wrote:I saved the best for last. I think Gordon and Exum are going to megabust. Gordon will be a forever raw hustle athlete that can't seem to find an offensive/defensive identity, even though he'll be a good role playing rebounder. Exum, Mr. Lightning first step, says he's a PG, but isn't a gifted passer or playmaker. He doesn't really have a good shot either. So, he's a really frail 6'6 PG that can't do PG things, shoot, or finish at the rim through any contact.

That honestly sounds like the definition of a bust, "post-busting". I like the character of the guy and I like what he could become (Penny Hardaway 2).. but his ceiling's height isn't nearly as low as his floor's depth. I won't change my opinion of him until I see him develop in the direction of the hype. He has literally only ONE quality right now.. a great first step. Maybe 2. He has a great video game name.



These are pretty baseless comments. Finishing at the rim was one of his strengths pre-draft according to scouts.

And some of his passes in SL were special -- great timing and touch.


So the right base for for predicting Exum's talents is just from summer league? You must be joakim.

I saw plenty of tape on Exum predraft, and I did not see any notable PG abilities in there. I saw a tweenerish guard with a good step and good handle who could finish on smaller competition and take it to the hole quickly off the dribble.

One of Exum's weaknesses is that he's not very strong, it will be much harder for him to finish against bigger athletes than it has been for him playing in Australia.

Your assessment on his passing and playmaking is wrong, period, but you are right about his strength and inexperience being real weaknesses.

But even with those weakness, the fact still remains-- he's barely 19 years old, has a good handle, great passing instinct, and is 6'6". He will get stronger, and he will become experienced. Like, these aren't even ifs. He will literally get stronger as he gets older, and he will literally become experienced.

The jumpshot still has me worried. My optimism in this area is that his pre-draft footage showed us a very flat, ugly shot. Summer league, while he was still missing a lot, showed us a much improved arc and form. So hopefully that'll progress nicely as he gets older.

I really don't expect him to make real noise for a while, but I hardly expect him to bust, either. Unless he really injures himself, he has too many physical gifts to fail completely for a fifth pick.
MrTwister
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,500
And1: 1,081
Joined: Jan 06, 2013
Location: Montenegro
 

Re: rookies: best, sleeper, bust 

Post#73 » by MrTwister » Tue Aug 12, 2014 9:41 pm

Best:Wiggins,Parker,Noel
Sleeper:Bruno,Nurkic(if he gets minutes),Payton
Bust:Gordon,Napier,Smart,Ennis
YouMustBeJoakim
Rookie
Posts: 1,043
And1: 274
Joined: Feb 10, 2011
   

Re: rookies: best, sleeper, bust 

Post#74 » by YouMustBeJoakim » Tue Aug 12, 2014 9:48 pm

DoubleLintendre wrote:
So the right base for for predicting Exum's talents is just from summer league? You must be joakim.

I saw plenty of tape on Exum predraft, and I did not see any notable PG abilities in there. I saw a tweenerish guard with a good step and good handle who could finish on smaller competition and take it to the hole quickly off the dribble.

One of Exum's weaknesses is that he's not very strong, it will be much harder for him to finish against bigger athletes than it has been for him playing in Australia.


I'm sure you were waiting for someone to mention Summer league. We can't assess skill-sets in games where he finally played against NBA talent? Let's just throw away McDermott's SL then.

But you said he wasn't a playmaker, even though this was his #1 asset as a prospect. His driving and dishing (along with his defense) is why he was considered the top PG prospect this year, over Lavine, Smart, and Payton.
WiggOuts
Veteran
Posts: 2,959
And1: 1,779
Joined: Dec 13, 2013

Re: rookies: best, sleeper, bust 

Post#75 » by WiggOuts » Tue Aug 12, 2014 11:06 pm

DuckIII wrote:
WiggOuts wrote:
DuckIII wrote:
Napier isn't on the Heat?

Im obviously talking about Lebron. Kind of funny how he went out of his way to compliment Napier to the point of MIA trading to draft him. a parting gift maybe?


I guess I didn't understand your "ship has sailed" comment. The fact that LeBron lobbied for Napier and then left, will make Miami look even more foolish if (when?) Napier proves to be a huge bust. That guy had no business being drafted anywhere near the first round. Not that I'm rooting against the guy. I loved his heart and balls in college. But I don't see anything resembling an NBA player there at all.

I agree completely...I found it hilarious that they traded up. He does have heart but that can only get you so far...physically, its gonna be a tough road for him
User avatar
DoubleLintendre
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,334
And1: 8,654
Joined: Jul 15, 2012
 

Re: rookies: best, sleeper, bust 

Post#76 » by DoubleLintendre » Wed Aug 13, 2014 3:41 am

Xsy wrote:Your assessment on his passing and playmaking is wrong, period, but you are right about his strength and inexperience being real weaknesses.

But even with those weakness, the fact still remains-- he's barely 19 years old, has a good handle, great passing instinct, and is 6'6". He will get stronger, and he will become experienced. Like, these aren't even ifs. He will literally get stronger as he gets older, and he will literally become experienced.

The jumpshot still has me worried. My optimism in this area is that his pre-draft footage showed us a very flat, ugly shot. Summer league, while he was still missing a lot, showed us a much improved arc and form. So hopefully that'll progress nicely as he gets older.

I really don't expect him to make real noise for a while, but I hardly expect him to bust, either. Unless he really injures himself, he has too many physical gifts to fail completely for a fifth pick.


I was answering a "look at Summer League only" argument with "look at the draft reports only" argument. Looking at them separately will make any prediction look skewed. I wasn't implying I think Exum has no PG skills..

Exum's pre-draft footage and scouting reports really indicated to me that he's is a more of a slashing combo guard than anything. Many reports looked at Exum, before he announced he was definitely a PG, as a SG/PG with above average ball handling and decent passing abilities. His passing and playmaking game is definitely above average for a guard. However that's way different than saying he's primed to make the move to a full time PG.

I said in my first post I didn't see him as a "gifted" passer/playmaker. But gifted =/= capable. I see Dante working as a combo guard type player, rather than a playmaking/offense running PG.

Dante's SL play isn't something to gloss over, but I still have my doubts because again-- playing PG exclusively when you've been kind of a generalist guard is anything but a cakewalk. I think the odds are stacked against him because the learning curve in the NBA for PGs is sharper than for big men. You don't get as many opportunities to mess up. You're the coach on the floor. When the PG makes mistakes it's different than when a Center finds himself in foul trouble or rotating sloppily.

YouMustBeJoakim wrote:I'm sure you were waiting for someone to mention Summer league. We can't assess skill-sets in games where he finally played against NBA talent? Let's just throw away McDermott's SL then.

But you said he wasn't a playmaker, even though this was his #1 asset as a prospect. His driving and dishing (along with his defense) is why he was considered the top PG prospect this year, over Lavine, Smart, and Payton.


The difference between McDermott's showing in the SL and Dante's, is that you can find tapes and tapes of McD doing the exact same thing throughout his college career. He sinks the same shots and makes the same "coach's son" plays that he's been known to make.

With Dante, he's trying to define his position and focus on an aspects of his game that havn't been refined. I don't mean to take away from his ability to drive and dish-- as this has become the hallmark of this generation's scoring PGs. If anything Dante has some very unique traits, with his quickness, high IQ, and intangibles.

If Exum had said he's a slash and pass combo guard, over saying he's a PG I'd be less inclined to feel he's going to bust. Learning to be a PG is probably the hardest thing you can do as a developing player. I disagree that his best asset is his playmaking, I think his best assets are his quickness, handle, and scoring instincts.

As soon as he defined himself as a PG, and was drafted as a PG, I think he's pigeonholed himself into somewhat of a make or break situation.
User avatar
oldschooled
Veteran
Posts: 2,800
And1: 2,712
Joined: Nov 17, 2012
 

Re: rookies: best, sleeper, bust 

Post#77 » by oldschooled » Wed Aug 13, 2014 3:41 am

chuckdevlin wrote:Best: Bruno
Sleeper: Bruno


Best: Bruno
Sleeper: Bruno
Bust: Bruno

fixed it for ya
Frank Dux wrote:
LeChosen One wrote:Doc is right. The Warriors shouldn't get any respect unless they repeat to be honest.


According to your logic, Tim Duncan doesn't deserve any respect.
User avatar
chuckdevlin
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,404
And1: 10,187
Joined: Jul 30, 2013
Location: Brampton
Contact:
 

Re: rookies: best, sleeper, bust 

Post#78 » by chuckdevlin » Wed Aug 13, 2014 3:42 am

oldscho0led wrote:
chuckdevlin wrote:Best: Bruno
Sleeper: Bruno


Best: Bruno
Sleeper: Bruno
Bust: Randle

fixed it for ya
Retire Joey Graham's Number in the ACC #letsgooo #whatnumber?
User avatar
Eoghan
RealGM
Posts: 11,315
And1: 3,293
Joined: May 20, 2009
         

Re: rookies: best, sleeper, bust 

Post#79 » by Eoghan » Wed Aug 13, 2014 4:04 am

Wow, lots of you have Vonleh in the bust column. I don't know if he'll be a bust but I fully expect him to have a snoozer of a rookie year. He is better than I thought he'd be though.
Nuggets_Talk
Head Coach
Posts: 6,389
And1: 2,298
Joined: Oct 19, 2003
Contact:
 

Re: rookies: best, sleeper, bust 

Post#80 » by Nuggets_Talk » Wed Aug 13, 2014 5:38 am

Magic_Johnny12 wrote:BEST - Parker, would have picked Embiid if he was healthy.

SLEEPER - Gordon (and not because I'm an Orlando fan).


Yes it is

Return to The General Board