hands11 wrote:EG Message to his RealGM hatters.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9FnO3igOkOk[/youtube]
I didn't know we had hatters. To the best of my knowledge we've never gone after Ernie's horrendous comb over.
Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart
hands11 wrote:EG Message to his RealGM hatters.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9FnO3igOkOk[/youtube]
JWizmentality wrote:hands11 wrote:EG Message to his RealGM hatters.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9FnO3igOkOk[/youtube]
I didn't know we had hatters. To the best of my knowledge we've never gone after Ernie's horrendous comb over.
montestewart wrote:mohammed10 wrote:EG accepts the ice bucket challenge...
http://cdnapi.kaltura.com/index.php/ext ... 0_47p6kla0
This ALS phenomenon has jumped the shark…
If you're not naked in a bathtub, it doesn't count.
hands11 wrote:[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iPQfwmfRq2s[/youtube]
Board to EG.
EG's message to the board.
Well at least to some here. I will not disclose names. They know who they are.
hands11 wrote:Yet some how William Shatner had a long productive career and still has work.
And in the end, he always won.
And yeah, that sneaking up behind you. That's was EG. Which was the one thing you got right and was the point of the post to begin with.
closg00 wrote:hands11 wrote:Yet some how William Shatner had a long productive career and still has work.
And in the end, he always won.
And yeah, that sneaking up behind you. That's was EG. Which was the one thing you got right and was the point of the post to begin with.
There-in lies the incredibly low bar that you (but not most here), are willing to accept. Shatner indeed has had a long career, but has he been anything other than a hack and mediocre "working" actor his entire career? You're giddy to have Shatner, we want a Brando or De Niro.
montestewart wrote:closg00 wrote:hands11 wrote:Yet some how William Shatner had a long productive career and still has work.
And in the end, he always won.
And yeah, that sneaking up behind you. That's was EG. Which was the one thing you got right and was the point of the post to begin with.
There-in lies the incredibly low bar that you (but not most here), are willing to accept. Shatner indeed has had a long career, but has he been anything other than a hack and mediocre "working" actor his entire career? You're giddy to have Shatner, we want a Brando or De Niro.
You have to half patients. Sucks doesn't combover ninth. Ita'ss excremental.
montestewart wrote:closg00 wrote:hands11 wrote:Yet some how William Shatner had a long productive career and still has work.
And in the end, he always won.
And yeah, that sneaking up behind you. That's was EG. Which was the one thing you got right and was the point of the post to begin with.
There-in lies the incredibly low bar that you (but not most here), are willing to accept. Shatner indeed has had a long career, but has he been anything other than a hack and mediocre "working" actor his entire career? You're giddy to have Shatner, we want a Brando or De Niro.
You have to half patients. Sucks doesn't combover ninth. Ita'ss excremental.
dckingsfan wrote:montestewart wrote:closg00 wrote:
There-in lies the incredibly low bar that you (but not most here), are willing to accept. Shatner indeed has had a long career, but has he been anything other than a hack and mediocre "working" actor his entire career? You're giddy to have Shatner, we want a Brando or De Niro.
You have to half patients. Sucks doesn't combover ninth. Ita'ss excremental.
HOF!!
montestewart wrote:closg00 wrote:hands11 wrote:Yet some how William Shatner had a long productive career and still has work.
And in the end, he always won.
And yeah, that sneaking up behind you. That's was EG. Which was the one thing you got right and was the point of the post to begin with.
There-in lies the incredibly low bar that you (but not most here), are willing to accept. Shatner indeed has had a long career, but has he been anything other than a hack and mediocre "working" actor his entire career? You're giddy to have Shatner, we want a Brando or De Niro.
You have to half patients. Sucks doesn't combover ninth. Ita'ss excremental.
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.
closg00 wrote:hands11 wrote:Yet some how William Shatner had a long productive career and still has work.
And in the end, he always won.
And yeah, that sneaking up behind you. That's was EG. Which was the one thing you got right and was the point of the post to begin with.
There-in lies the incredibly low bar that you (but not most here), are willing to accept. Shatner indeed has had a long career, but has he been anything other than a hack and mediocre "working" actor his entire career? You're giddy to have Shatner, we want a Brando or De Niro.
milellie111 wrote:3-1 and off to a great start at the beginning of the season. Team is playing great. Free agent signings are looking as promised and this is one of the deepest teams in the league. A good year is in store for Wizards fans.
pineappleheadindc wrote:milellie111 wrote:3-1 and off to a great start at the beginning of the season. Team is playing great. Free agent signings are looking as promised and this is one of the deepest teams in the league. A good year is in store for Wizards fans.
Welcome back, Milellie!
Look, dude, let me give you some lessons on trolling that you can use from this point forward.
1. You can't just troll this thread (or the various 100s of others that talk about Grunfeld, the GM.) You have to expand your horizons. For instance, start trolling the random thoughts thread. Put things unreleated to basketball in there and tie it to your man.
2. Examples:
a. If there is ever some big good news story -- trapped miners are rescued, etc -- post a link to the news story with your commentary: "Chilean miners were rescued from certain death. Who to thank? Grunfeld. (and attach a nice pic of Ernie)."
b Post a youtube cute cat video. "Cats are cute! Who gets credit for that? Grunfeld."
c. [In the politics section] "Congress just passed this great bill. Who to thank? Grunfeld."
d. Hey they're opening a new hipster bar in Chinatown. Who to thank? Yeah, you know who."
The idea is to bring your unique and special Ernie message to all corners of the board. This strategy will make you *even more* popular with board members and ensure that we -- the small but committed band of Wizards loyalists on RealGM -- will ultimately join you in praising the basketball genius that is Ernie Grunfeld.
Go Wizards!!!
tontoz wrote:How many 1st round picks from the 2011 draft aren't in the NBA now? EG picked 2 of them. Are there any more?
'Kanyewest wrote:tontoz wrote:How many 1st round picks from the 2011 draft aren't in the NBA now? EG picked 2 of them. Are there any more?
But Shelvin Mack is!