LloydFree wrote:I agree with a lot of your assessment of KJMcD. I'm not sure if the 76ers are the type team that will maximize his talents, and more importantly, mask his weaknesses. He would have been better off drafted to a really good team like OKC or the Clippers. He doesn't have a good enough handle to be a starting SG in the NBA, right now. On a good team, with multiple scoring options and ball handlers, he could focus on being a "glue guy" while his jumper improved.
While I haven't seen enough of him to know if he has a better chance to pan out than CJ Wilcox, I really wanted him for the Clippers, I was salivating on the idea of him alongside Bullock forming a tandem of long wing defenders to play off the ball next to Blake and Paul in the future.
wickedwrister wrote:5) Philly's 2017 1st back from Orlando (originally sent to Orlando in the Bynum debacle)
I never got that from Orlando's perspective, they gave a 1st and a 2nd to move up 2 spots? was the pick heavily protected?
To answer your question, I personally think moving Jrue was a risk that I'm not sure if I'd take, it'll depend on how Noel's career pans out. But my objection to Hinkie's plan is more about his obsession with maximizing lottery odds at the cost of not adding pieces that can be valuable in the future, either to turn into better assets or to keep long term. No sense in being 15 million under the cap or whatever you guys are right now, if you're not gonna use that flexibility for anything. I'd rather him take bad contracts in exchange for future assets, or sign one or two of those guys who don't move the needle and turn them into more assets down the road. Like we saw last year, you're not guaranteed to be the worst team anyway.