ImageImageImage

We should be making a play for Bledsoe

Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites

User avatar
Han Solo
General Manager
Posts: 9,903
And1: 7,696
Joined: Jan 07, 2011
Contact:
     

We should be making a play for Bledsoe 

Post#1 » by Han Solo » Sun Aug 24, 2014 5:36 pm

Only knock as far as i can tell is his durability. Watching him play last year, he's a two way player that dominated. We should at least try to move Monroe for him. Greg doesn't want to be here.
MotownMadness
RealGM
Posts: 38,753
And1: 22,818
Joined: Oct 08, 2013
   

Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe 

Post#2 » by MotownMadness » Sun Aug 24, 2014 5:48 pm

Agreed
Neptune
Veteran
Posts: 2,699
And1: 1,386
Joined: Jan 30, 2014

Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe 

Post#3 » by Neptune » Sun Aug 24, 2014 5:50 pm

No to moving a healthy big for Bledsoe. And Monroe never said he doesn't want to be here, his agent is just trying to get his client paid the most money as possible.
theBigLip
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 16,866
And1: 3,459
Joined: May 22, 2001
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
       

Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe 

Post#4 » by theBigLip » Sun Aug 24, 2014 5:53 pm

Neptune wrote:No to moving a healthy big for Bledsoe. And Monroe never said he doesn't want to be here, his agent is just trying to get his client paid the most money as possible.


But regardless of Falk's posturing to get $$$ for Monroe, does Monroe even fit with Drummond? If not, we need to move him and move on.
User avatar
Kilo
RealGM
Posts: 12,268
And1: 5,255
Joined: Jun 18, 2011
 

Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe 

Post#5 » by Kilo » Sun Aug 24, 2014 6:00 pm

Only if Jennings is being shipped out somewhere in the deal. No way do I want Bledsoe/Jennings/Augustin/Bynum/Dinwiddie all on the team, 1/3rd of our roster being point guards. And in trading Monroe for a PG, we'd have Jerebko as our primary PF back-up and Gray as our primary Ce back-up.

Keep Monroe for the year with the QO and then use next off-season to fix the mess of a roster further.
Weaver = Hinkie
VW to Portland :pray:
ImHeisenberg
Head Coach
Posts: 6,465
And1: 2,323
Joined: Apr 01, 2013
 

Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe 

Post#6 » by ImHeisenberg » Sun Aug 24, 2014 7:49 pm

I'm not entirely against the idea of pursuing Bledsoe. But, he's not worth the money his agent is demanding.

Primarily due to his inconsistent health. He's a fine player when he's healthy, which is seldom.
User avatar
Kilo
RealGM
Posts: 12,268
And1: 5,255
Joined: Jun 18, 2011
 

Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe 

Post#7 » by Kilo » Sun Aug 24, 2014 7:59 pm

ImHeisenberg wrote:I'm not entirely against the idea of pursuing Bledsoe. But, he's not worth the money his agent is demanding.

Primarily due to his inconsistent health. He's a fine player when he's healthy, which is seldom.


I wonder if his ego would find it easier to take on less than his initial demands from a new team.
Weaver = Hinkie
VW to Portland :pray:
sc8581
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,876
And1: 766
Joined: Jul 22, 2013

Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe 

Post#8 » by sc8581 » Sun Aug 24, 2014 8:18 pm

Kilo wrote:Only if Jennings is being shipped out somewhere in the deal. No way do I want Bledsoe/Jennings/Augustin/Bynum/Dinwiddie all on the team, 1/3rd of our roster being point guards. And in trading Monroe for a PG, we'd have Jerebko as our primary PF back-up and Gray as our primary Ce back-up.

Keep Monroe for the year with the QO and then use next off-season to fix the mess of a roster further.


Why are you so concerned about this upcoming season, it's not like we are competing for anything yet.
Cowology
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 41,183
And1: 4,635
Joined: Sep 05, 2004

Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe 

Post#9 » by Cowology » Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:09 pm

I agree with..everybody. In theory I'd like Bleodso, but not at the price he's asking and it leaves us with a glut of pg's and thin up front. The deal would have to be larger, probably involve a 3rd team and then would likely crumble under the nuanced complexity required to satisfy everybody's needs.

One way or another the Monroe saga will ultimately work itself out. Probably next Summer when he walks. I'm more distraught over the 2 yrs remaining on Jennings contract.
User avatar
Snakebites
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 51,009
And1: 18,117
Joined: Jul 14, 2002
Location: Looking not-so-happily deranged
   

Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe 

Post#10 » by Snakebites » Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:23 pm

Couple of things with respect to my feelings on this:

1) I don't particularly care about the number of point guards we have on this team. Move guys if necessary. Let Jennings ride the pine for 2 years. We've taken worse cap hits than that before. We need better players on the perimeter and we need them badly. The reality is that simple and that stark. Anyone who fits well with Drummond warrants consideration. He's the only currently non-negotiable part of our core at the moment.

2) A maximum price tag is what it would take to get him in a Pistons uniform. I'm apprehensive about that to say the least.

3) Injury is a concern but I'd be prepared to roll the dice if it weren't for the maximum price tag.

4) Player for player I'd move Monroe for him in a heartbeat, and I'd go so far as to make that regardless of the likelihood that he's walking. Number 2 is the only concern.

5) Its not happening. There doesn't appear to be much interest in Monroe on the Suns' part, and that's really the only viable option at this stage is a sign and trade.
User avatar
TurboTitan
Starter
Posts: 2,188
And1: 1,940
Joined: Jul 12, 2013
Location: Windsor, ON
       

Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe 

Post#11 » by TurboTitan » Mon Aug 25, 2014 1:35 am

Bledsoe's defence is top 5 for PG's in the NBA (IMO)
“We don't see ourselves as All-Stars. We see ourselves as one unit. It's like five fingers on a hand. You can do more damage together as a fist than spread out flat.” ~SHEED
captainrebel
Pro Prospect
Posts: 995
And1: 48
Joined: Jun 09, 2001

Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe 

Post#12 » by captainrebel » Mon Aug 25, 2014 1:40 am

My thought is that one of the reasons Monroe didn’t accept the offer from Detroit is that he doesn’t want to share the PF spot with Josh. I could be wrong but you have to look at all the possible reasons why he didn’t sign. I know there are stories where he denied wanting Josh off the team but be real, neither Monroe, Josh or anyone speaking for the Pistons will ever admit any negative reports.

As for Bledsoe, though I have serious concerns about his health I wouldn't mind the trade but not for the max and certainly not while we have Bynum, Jennings, Augustin and Dinwiddie. Trading Monroe for Bledsoe would mean at least 2 of the current guards will probably have to be moved, preferably Bynum and Jennings, and I can’t see phoenix having any interest in any of them.
Warspite
RealGM
Posts: 13,523
And1: 1,228
Joined: Dec 13, 2003
Location: Surprise AZ
Contact:
       

Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe 

Post#13 » by Warspite » Mon Aug 25, 2014 3:25 am

What are you giving up for him?

KCP is in for sure. Im guessing we are trying to send them Smith but I dont see how that is incentive for the Suns.

I cant think of anything that would upset Monroe more than doing a S&T and giving Bledsoe 17mil a yr. Might as well renouce the QO and use the cap space to get Bledsoe.

So we renounce Monroe send KCP+JJ then roll with
Jennings, Bledsoe, Singler, Smith, Drummond

Dont see how that makes us much better and we still have holes at the wings. Whats worse is that we no longer have cap space in 15,16 or 17.
HomoSapien wrote:Warspite, the greatest poster in the history of realgm.
sc8581
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,876
And1: 766
Joined: Jul 22, 2013

Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe 

Post#14 » by sc8581 » Mon Aug 25, 2014 3:39 am

Warspite wrote:What are you giving up for him?

KCP is in for sure. Im guessing we are trying to send them Smith but I dont see how that is incentive for the Suns.

I cant think of anything that would upset Monroe more than doing a S&T and giving Bledsoe 17mil a yr. Might as well renouce the QO and use the cap space to get Bledsoe.

So we renounce Monroe send KCP+JJ then roll with
Jennings, Bledsoe, Singler, Smith, Drummond

Dont see how that makes us much better and we still have holes at the wings. Whats worse is that we no longer have cap space in 15,16 or 17.


What in the world are you talking about? The discussion has been Monroe for Bledsoe straight up. If we renounced Monroe we would only have $10M in cap space so we wouldn't be able to sign Bledsoe outright and even if we had enough cap space to do so Phoenix would likely match any offer.
sc8581
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,876
And1: 766
Joined: Jul 22, 2013

Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe 

Post#15 » by sc8581 » Mon Aug 25, 2014 3:40 am

We would be signing Bledsoe to replace Jennings by the way, not to start at the 2.
Neptune
Veteran
Posts: 2,699
And1: 1,386
Joined: Jan 30, 2014

Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe 

Post#16 » by Neptune » Mon Aug 25, 2014 3:52 am

^Bledsoe had his best season as a 2. Why would trade a guy who's actually talented at assisting the ball for someone who can't?
sc8581
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,876
And1: 766
Joined: Jul 22, 2013

Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe 

Post#17 » by sc8581 » Mon Aug 25, 2014 3:56 am

Neptune wrote:^Bledsoe had his best season as a 2. Why would trade a guy who's actually talented at assisting the ball for someone who can't?


Talented at assisting the ball????

Where do you guys come up with this stuff? Jennings is garbage on both ends of the floor, Bledsoe is an elite defender at the point and can score in a variety of ways. So why do you think I would replace Jennings with Bledsoe?
User avatar
TurboTitan
Starter
Posts: 2,188
And1: 1,940
Joined: Jul 12, 2013
Location: Windsor, ON
       

Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe 

Post#18 » by TurboTitan » Mon Aug 25, 2014 4:14 am

sc8581 wrote:
Neptune wrote:^Bledsoe had his best season as a 2. Why would trade a guy who's actually talented at assisting the ball for someone who can't?


Talented at assisting the ball????

Where do you guys come up with this stuff? Jennings is garbage on both ends of the floor, Bledsoe is an elite defender at the point and can score in a variety of ways. So why do you think I would replace Jennings with Bledsoe?

Passing is one of Jennings best attributes. You don't average 7.6 assists by luck. He did that without 3 point shooters playing with him as well.
“We don't see ourselves as All-Stars. We see ourselves as one unit. It's like five fingers on a hand. You can do more damage together as a fist than spread out flat.” ~SHEED
epheisey
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,443
And1: 409
Joined: Jul 23, 2010
         

Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe 

Post#19 » by epheisey » Mon Aug 25, 2014 4:22 am

sc8581 wrote:
Neptune wrote:^Bledsoe had his best season as a 2. Why would trade a guy who's actually talented at assisting the ball for someone who can't?


Talented at assisting the ball????

Where do you guys come up with this stuff? Jennings is garbage on both ends of the floor, Bledsoe is an elite defender at the point and can score in a variety of ways. So why do you think I would replace Jennings with Bledsoe?


If we're talking about who's better at running the offense. That's clearly Jennings. And a quick look at their Ast/TO ratio, and you can see that Bledsoe doesn't hang on to the ball quite like you'd want your main ball handler to do.
sc8581
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,876
And1: 766
Joined: Jul 22, 2013

Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe 

Post#20 » by sc8581 » Mon Aug 25, 2014 4:26 am

epheisey wrote:
sc8581 wrote:
Neptune wrote:^Bledsoe had his best season as a 2. Why would trade a guy who's actually talented at assisting the ball for someone who can't?


Talented at assisting the ball????

Where do you guys come up with this stuff? Jennings is garbage on both ends of the floor, Bledsoe is an elite defender at the point and can score in a variety of ways. So why do you think I would replace Jennings with Bledsoe?


If we're talking about who's better at running the offense. That's clearly Jennings. And a quick look at their Ast/TO ratio, and you can see that Bledsoe doesn't hang on to the ball quite like you'd want your main ball handler to do.


Jennings doesn't turn the ball over as much because he doesn't ever take the ball to the hole, Bledsoe does that as well as anybody so his turnovers are going to be higher for sure. Add that to the fact that last year was his first time seeing major minutes and that's bound to improve IMO.

Return to Detroit Pistons