We should be making a play for Bledsoe
Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites
We should be making a play for Bledsoe
- Han Solo
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,903
- And1: 7,696
- Joined: Jan 07, 2011
- Contact:
-
We should be making a play for Bledsoe
Only knock as far as i can tell is his durability. Watching him play last year, he's a two way player that dominated. We should at least try to move Monroe for him. Greg doesn't want to be here.
Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,753
- And1: 22,818
- Joined: Oct 08, 2013
-
Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,699
- And1: 1,386
- Joined: Jan 30, 2014
Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe
No to moving a healthy big for Bledsoe. And Monroe never said he doesn't want to be here, his agent is just trying to get his client paid the most money as possible.
Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe
-
- Forum Mod - Pistons
- Posts: 16,866
- And1: 3,459
- Joined: May 22, 2001
- Location: Santa Cruz, CA
-
Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe
Neptune wrote:No to moving a healthy big for Bledsoe. And Monroe never said he doesn't want to be here, his agent is just trying to get his client paid the most money as possible.
But regardless of Falk's posturing to get $$$ for Monroe, does Monroe even fit with Drummond? If not, we need to move him and move on.
Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe
- Kilo
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,268
- And1: 5,255
- Joined: Jun 18, 2011
-
Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe
Only if Jennings is being shipped out somewhere in the deal. No way do I want Bledsoe/Jennings/Augustin/Bynum/Dinwiddie all on the team, 1/3rd of our roster being point guards. And in trading Monroe for a PG, we'd have Jerebko as our primary PF back-up and Gray as our primary Ce back-up.
Keep Monroe for the year with the QO and then use next off-season to fix the mess of a roster further.
Keep Monroe for the year with the QO and then use next off-season to fix the mess of a roster further.
Weaver = Hinkie
VW to Portland
VW to Portland

Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,465
- And1: 2,323
- Joined: Apr 01, 2013
-
Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe
I'm not entirely against the idea of pursuing Bledsoe. But, he's not worth the money his agent is demanding.
Primarily due to his inconsistent health. He's a fine player when he's healthy, which is seldom.
Primarily due to his inconsistent health. He's a fine player when he's healthy, which is seldom.
Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe
- Kilo
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,268
- And1: 5,255
- Joined: Jun 18, 2011
-
Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe
ImHeisenberg wrote:I'm not entirely against the idea of pursuing Bledsoe. But, he's not worth the money his agent is demanding.
Primarily due to his inconsistent health. He's a fine player when he's healthy, which is seldom.
I wonder if his ego would find it easier to take on less than his initial demands from a new team.
Weaver = Hinkie
VW to Portland
VW to Portland

Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,876
- And1: 766
- Joined: Jul 22, 2013
Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe
Kilo wrote:Only if Jennings is being shipped out somewhere in the deal. No way do I want Bledsoe/Jennings/Augustin/Bynum/Dinwiddie all on the team, 1/3rd of our roster being point guards. And in trading Monroe for a PG, we'd have Jerebko as our primary PF back-up and Gray as our primary Ce back-up.
Keep Monroe for the year with the QO and then use next off-season to fix the mess of a roster further.
Why are you so concerned about this upcoming season, it's not like we are competing for anything yet.
Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe
-
- Forum Mod - Pistons
- Posts: 41,183
- And1: 4,635
- Joined: Sep 05, 2004
Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe
I agree with..everybody. In theory I'd like Bleodso, but not at the price he's asking and it leaves us with a glut of pg's and thin up front. The deal would have to be larger, probably involve a 3rd team and then would likely crumble under the nuanced complexity required to satisfy everybody's needs.
One way or another the Monroe saga will ultimately work itself out. Probably next Summer when he walks. I'm more distraught over the 2 yrs remaining on Jennings contract.
One way or another the Monroe saga will ultimately work itself out. Probably next Summer when he walks. I'm more distraught over the 2 yrs remaining on Jennings contract.
Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe
- Snakebites
- Forum Mod - Pistons
- Posts: 51,009
- And1: 18,117
- Joined: Jul 14, 2002
- Location: Looking not-so-happily deranged
-
Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe
Couple of things with respect to my feelings on this:
1) I don't particularly care about the number of point guards we have on this team. Move guys if necessary. Let Jennings ride the pine for 2 years. We've taken worse cap hits than that before. We need better players on the perimeter and we need them badly. The reality is that simple and that stark. Anyone who fits well with Drummond warrants consideration. He's the only currently non-negotiable part of our core at the moment.
2) A maximum price tag is what it would take to get him in a Pistons uniform. I'm apprehensive about that to say the least.
3) Injury is a concern but I'd be prepared to roll the dice if it weren't for the maximum price tag.
4) Player for player I'd move Monroe for him in a heartbeat, and I'd go so far as to make that regardless of the likelihood that he's walking. Number 2 is the only concern.
5) Its not happening. There doesn't appear to be much interest in Monroe on the Suns' part, and that's really the only viable option at this stage is a sign and trade.
1) I don't particularly care about the number of point guards we have on this team. Move guys if necessary. Let Jennings ride the pine for 2 years. We've taken worse cap hits than that before. We need better players on the perimeter and we need them badly. The reality is that simple and that stark. Anyone who fits well with Drummond warrants consideration. He's the only currently non-negotiable part of our core at the moment.
2) A maximum price tag is what it would take to get him in a Pistons uniform. I'm apprehensive about that to say the least.
3) Injury is a concern but I'd be prepared to roll the dice if it weren't for the maximum price tag.
4) Player for player I'd move Monroe for him in a heartbeat, and I'd go so far as to make that regardless of the likelihood that he's walking. Number 2 is the only concern.
5) Its not happening. There doesn't appear to be much interest in Monroe on the Suns' part, and that's really the only viable option at this stage is a sign and trade.
Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe
- TurboTitan
- Starter
- Posts: 2,188
- And1: 1,940
- Joined: Jul 12, 2013
- Location: Windsor, ON
-
Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe
Bledsoe's defence is top 5 for PG's in the NBA (IMO)
“We don't see ourselves as All-Stars. We see ourselves as one unit. It's like five fingers on a hand. You can do more damage together as a fist than spread out flat.” ~SHEED
Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 995
- And1: 48
- Joined: Jun 09, 2001
Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe
My thought is that one of the reasons Monroe didn’t accept the offer from Detroit is that he doesn’t want to share the PF spot with Josh. I could be wrong but you have to look at all the possible reasons why he didn’t sign. I know there are stories where he denied wanting Josh off the team but be real, neither Monroe, Josh or anyone speaking for the Pistons will ever admit any negative reports.
As for Bledsoe, though I have serious concerns about his health I wouldn't mind the trade but not for the max and certainly not while we have Bynum, Jennings, Augustin and Dinwiddie. Trading Monroe for Bledsoe would mean at least 2 of the current guards will probably have to be moved, preferably Bynum and Jennings, and I can’t see phoenix having any interest in any of them.
As for Bledsoe, though I have serious concerns about his health I wouldn't mind the trade but not for the max and certainly not while we have Bynum, Jennings, Augustin and Dinwiddie. Trading Monroe for Bledsoe would mean at least 2 of the current guards will probably have to be moved, preferably Bynum and Jennings, and I can’t see phoenix having any interest in any of them.
Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,523
- And1: 1,228
- Joined: Dec 13, 2003
- Location: Surprise AZ
- Contact:
-
Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe
What are you giving up for him?
KCP is in for sure. Im guessing we are trying to send them Smith but I dont see how that is incentive for the Suns.
I cant think of anything that would upset Monroe more than doing a S&T and giving Bledsoe 17mil a yr. Might as well renouce the QO and use the cap space to get Bledsoe.
So we renounce Monroe send KCP+JJ then roll with
Jennings, Bledsoe, Singler, Smith, Drummond
Dont see how that makes us much better and we still have holes at the wings. Whats worse is that we no longer have cap space in 15,16 or 17.
KCP is in for sure. Im guessing we are trying to send them Smith but I dont see how that is incentive for the Suns.
I cant think of anything that would upset Monroe more than doing a S&T and giving Bledsoe 17mil a yr. Might as well renouce the QO and use the cap space to get Bledsoe.
So we renounce Monroe send KCP+JJ then roll with
Jennings, Bledsoe, Singler, Smith, Drummond
Dont see how that makes us much better and we still have holes at the wings. Whats worse is that we no longer have cap space in 15,16 or 17.
HomoSapien wrote:Warspite, the greatest poster in the history of realgm.
Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,876
- And1: 766
- Joined: Jul 22, 2013
Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe
Warspite wrote:What are you giving up for him?
KCP is in for sure. Im guessing we are trying to send them Smith but I dont see how that is incentive for the Suns.
I cant think of anything that would upset Monroe more than doing a S&T and giving Bledsoe 17mil a yr. Might as well renouce the QO and use the cap space to get Bledsoe.
So we renounce Monroe send KCP+JJ then roll with
Jennings, Bledsoe, Singler, Smith, Drummond
Dont see how that makes us much better and we still have holes at the wings. Whats worse is that we no longer have cap space in 15,16 or 17.
What in the world are you talking about? The discussion has been Monroe for Bledsoe straight up. If we renounced Monroe we would only have $10M in cap space so we wouldn't be able to sign Bledsoe outright and even if we had enough cap space to do so Phoenix would likely match any offer.
Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,876
- And1: 766
- Joined: Jul 22, 2013
Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe
We would be signing Bledsoe to replace Jennings by the way, not to start at the 2.
Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,699
- And1: 1,386
- Joined: Jan 30, 2014
Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe
^Bledsoe had his best season as a 2. Why would trade a guy who's actually talented at assisting the ball for someone who can't?
Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,876
- And1: 766
- Joined: Jul 22, 2013
Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe
Neptune wrote:^Bledsoe had his best season as a 2. Why would trade a guy who's actually talented at assisting the ball for someone who can't?
Talented at assisting the ball????
Where do you guys come up with this stuff? Jennings is garbage on both ends of the floor, Bledsoe is an elite defender at the point and can score in a variety of ways. So why do you think I would replace Jennings with Bledsoe?
Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe
- TurboTitan
- Starter
- Posts: 2,188
- And1: 1,940
- Joined: Jul 12, 2013
- Location: Windsor, ON
-
Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe
sc8581 wrote:Neptune wrote:^Bledsoe had his best season as a 2. Why would trade a guy who's actually talented at assisting the ball for someone who can't?
Talented at assisting the ball????
Where do you guys come up with this stuff? Jennings is garbage on both ends of the floor, Bledsoe is an elite defender at the point and can score in a variety of ways. So why do you think I would replace Jennings with Bledsoe?
Passing is one of Jennings best attributes. You don't average 7.6 assists by luck. He did that without 3 point shooters playing with him as well.
“We don't see ourselves as All-Stars. We see ourselves as one unit. It's like five fingers on a hand. You can do more damage together as a fist than spread out flat.” ~SHEED
Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,443
- And1: 409
- Joined: Jul 23, 2010
-
Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe
sc8581 wrote:Neptune wrote:^Bledsoe had his best season as a 2. Why would trade a guy who's actually talented at assisting the ball for someone who can't?
Talented at assisting the ball????
Where do you guys come up with this stuff? Jennings is garbage on both ends of the floor, Bledsoe is an elite defender at the point and can score in a variety of ways. So why do you think I would replace Jennings with Bledsoe?
If we're talking about who's better at running the offense. That's clearly Jennings. And a quick look at their Ast/TO ratio, and you can see that Bledsoe doesn't hang on to the ball quite like you'd want your main ball handler to do.
Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,876
- And1: 766
- Joined: Jul 22, 2013
Re: We should be making a play for Bledsoe
epheisey wrote:sc8581 wrote:Neptune wrote:^Bledsoe had his best season as a 2. Why would trade a guy who's actually talented at assisting the ball for someone who can't?
Talented at assisting the ball????
Where do you guys come up with this stuff? Jennings is garbage on both ends of the floor, Bledsoe is an elite defender at the point and can score in a variety of ways. So why do you think I would replace Jennings with Bledsoe?
If we're talking about who's better at running the offense. That's clearly Jennings. And a quick look at their Ast/TO ratio, and you can see that Bledsoe doesn't hang on to the ball quite like you'd want your main ball handler to do.
Jennings doesn't turn the ball over as much because he doesn't ever take the ball to the hole, Bledsoe does that as well as anybody so his turnovers are going to be higher for sure. Add that to the fact that last year was his first time seeing major minutes and that's bound to improve IMO.