Post#9 » by BullHeaded » Wed Sep 24, 2014 4:08 pm
This year, we faced three of the best run defenses in the league so far... small sample size, but he's still outrushing Eddie Lacy who you could say the same about. Eddie Lacy and Adrian Peterson were the two AP All-Pros at the position last year... here's how they stacked up:
Matt Forte
1,339 rush yards, 4.6 ypc, 9 rushing TDs, 74 receptions, 594 receiving yards, 3 receiving TDs, 2 Fumbles Lost
Adrian Peterson
1,266 rush yards, 4.5 ypc, 10 rushing TDs, 29 receptions, 171 receiving yards, 1 receiving TD, 3 Fumbles Lost
Eddie Lacy
1,178 rush yards, 4.1 ypc, 11 rushing TDs, 35 receptions, 257 receiving yards, 0 receiving TDs, 1 Fumble Lost
Conclusion: Forte rushed for more yardage, had more yards per carry, more receptions, more receiving yards and more overall TDs than either of the guys who were "All Pro" in 2013. What's not in the stats is that Forte is also solid in protection when he's not taking a route.
As far as "grind it out yards" go. One thing I'd point out about Monday's game was WHEN he got the bulk of his yards. He had two key runs that picked up big first downs in probably our biggest drive down the stretch. That's anecdotal I know... but watching the games and seeing the context paints a more accurate picture.