LyricalRico wrote:DCZards wrote:payitforward wrote:
Meanwhile, over at the Lakers, there are a ton of young players who have a chance to show well -- including Jordan Clarkson whom we turned our nose up at in the last draft. Now... I realize that the Los Angeles Lakers are not an elite franchise with the long history of success that we have under the regime of Ernie Groundfog, but still....
Well, the Lakers are certainly not an elite team in 2014...which may be why a young, inexperienced guy like Jordan Clarkson has a chance to get some quality PT this year. Heck, he might even be a starter. The Zards are in a different situation this year than the Lakers...and that's a good thing.

Sorry, but those are a couple of shallow responses. We are now among the very oldest teams in the NBA. After next year, we have exactly 4 good players signed (Gortat, Wall, Beal & Porter -- and that's making significant assumptions about the progress Beal and Porter will make), and basically no one else on the roster (yet face a significant salary basis).
That's what we've managed to do in the 5 years since we began to "rebuild". And even that required us to get lucky twice w/ the ping pong balls for 2 of those 4 players.
Every team that looks to be on the way *up* over the coming 2-4 years has a roster with significant youth. Instead we have age. And fragility via injury. And the oh so great achievement this has bought us? We won 44 games in the weakest Eastern conference in a decade or more. And, oh boy, we got past a team whose best player was injured and whose second best player had been traded a month or so earlier. Great stuff. Lets all jump up and down, ok?