ImageImage

Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 62,883
And1: 41,260
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints 

Post#461 » by emunney » Mon Oct 27, 2014 3:24 am

Man, we're only a half game ahead of the Seahawks for the wildcard after tonight. Schneider must have shaken TT's hand this offseason.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
Godgers
Banned User
Posts: 1,474
And1: 117
Joined: Aug 08, 2012

Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints 

Post#462 » by Godgers » Mon Oct 27, 2014 3:25 am

Problem is this team is soft and if you can irritate Rodgers you get a automatic win.

Rodgers is the most gifted QB int he NFL but he is not a leader. When things don't go right it gets ugly. Or when the game gets tough the Packers roll over. Team has 0 leaders and very little vets if any.
Greatness
RealGM
Posts: 12,636
And1: 4,556
Joined: Aug 23, 2009
Location: Toronto
     

Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints 

Post#463 » by Greatness » Mon Oct 27, 2014 3:25 am

Saints will win their division at 8-8 or 7-9 and host a playoff game. That isn't right.
Balls2TheWalls
RealGM
Posts: 20,343
And1: 4,113
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
         

Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints 

Post#464 » by Balls2TheWalls » Mon Oct 27, 2014 3:25 am

Greatness wrote:Saints will win their division at 8-8 or 7-9 and host a playoff game. That isn't right.


Meh, the Packers did it last year. We definitely didn't deserve to host the 49ers.
SupremeHustle wrote:Salmons might shoot us out of games, but SJAX shoots people out of parking lots. Think about it.
User avatar
ampd
RealGM
Posts: 21,607
And1: 5,049
Joined: Dec 06, 2010

Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints 

Post#465 » by ampd » Mon Oct 27, 2014 3:25 am

emunney wrote:
ampd wrote:
emunney wrote:
He drafted Rodgers, too, and that bum's thrown 2 key interceptions today. Fire them both.

At some ppint someone has to be held accountable for the d being bad year after year. It's probaby not going to start with TT or mccarthy


The D isn't bad this year. They've had some good games and some bad games. They're average. That is what average looks like.

We've given up 44 points and 500 yards en route to not forcing a punt for the 2nd time this year.
User avatar
MartyConlonOnTheRun
RealGM
Posts: 27,472
And1: 13,291
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Location: Section 212 - Raising havoc in Squad 6

Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints 

Post#466 » by MartyConlonOnTheRun » Mon Oct 27, 2014 3:26 am

Who has the stronger arm right now? Flynn or Rodgers?
Greatness
RealGM
Posts: 12,636
And1: 4,556
Joined: Aug 23, 2009
Location: Toronto
     

Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints 

Post#467 » by Greatness » Mon Oct 27, 2014 3:27 am

Balls2TheWalls wrote:
Greatness wrote:Saints will win their division at 8-8 or 7-9 and host a playoff game. That isn't right.


Meh, the Packers did it last year. We definitely didn't deserve to host the 49ers.

I agree. I just don't like the idea of division winners automatically hosting a playoff game. Us included.
User avatar
BigDee
RealGM
Posts: 16,180
And1: 1,383
Joined: Jul 11, 2006
Location: Wisconsin
     

Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints 

Post#468 » by BigDee » Mon Oct 27, 2014 3:27 am

Nice job Flynn.
Balls2TheWalls
RealGM
Posts: 20,343
And1: 4,113
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
         

Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints 

Post#469 » by Balls2TheWalls » Mon Oct 27, 2014 3:27 am

Haha, Flynn sucks. We deserve to have 50 put up on us tonight. Hopefully we give up another long run to Mark Ingram.
SupremeHustle wrote:Salmons might shoot us out of games, but SJAX shoots people out of parking lots. Think about it.
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 103,136
And1: 55,668
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints 

Post#470 » by MickeyDavis » Mon Oct 27, 2014 3:27 am

Flynn FTW
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
Balls2TheWalls
RealGM
Posts: 20,343
And1: 4,113
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
         

Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints 

Post#471 » by Balls2TheWalls » Mon Oct 27, 2014 3:28 am

Wow we are a part of 66% of the puntless games in NFL history: this year. Hahahahhaa holy **** that is awful.
SupremeHustle wrote:Salmons might shoot us out of games, but SJAX shoots people out of parking lots. Think about it.
User avatar
Bernman
RealGM
Posts: 27,902
And1: 8,404
Joined: Aug 05, 2004
     

Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints 

Post#472 » by Bernman » Mon Oct 27, 2014 3:29 am

Godgers wrote:Problem is this team is soft and if you can irritate Rodgers you get a automatic win.

Rodgers is the most gifted QB int he NFL but he is not a leader. When things don't go right it gets ugly. Or when the game gets tough the Packers roll over. Team has 0 leaders and very little vets if any.


Either you're a Skip Bayless-esque troll, or Skip Bayless-esque idiot. I can't tell with either of you. Either way it's lame.

The only thing that was irritated was Rodgers' hamstring.
User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 62,883
And1: 41,260
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints 

Post#473 » by emunney » Mon Oct 27, 2014 3:30 am

ampd wrote:
emunney wrote:
ampd wrote:At some ppint someone has to be held accountable for the d being bad year after year. It's probaby not going to start with TT or mccarthy


The D isn't bad this year. They've had some good games and some bad games. They're average. That is what average looks like.

We've given up 44 points and 500 yards en route to not forcing a punt for the 2nd time this year.


We won the other game 38-17. D really let us down.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,785
And1: 27,354
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints 

Post#474 » by trwi7 » Mon Oct 27, 2014 3:31 am

Godgers wrote:Rodgers is the most gifted QB int he NFL but he is not a leader.


[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1aYN5XpWzpM[/youtube]
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Balls2TheWalls
RealGM
Posts: 20,343
And1: 4,113
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
         

Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints 

Post#475 » by Balls2TheWalls » Mon Oct 27, 2014 3:31 am

emunney wrote:
ampd wrote:
emunney wrote:
The D isn't bad this year. They've had some good games and some bad games. They're average. That is what average looks like.

We've given up 44 points and 500 yards en route to not forcing a punt for the 2nd time this year.


We won the other game 38-17. D really let us down.


This is really a red herring. In any game where we get ahead, the other team is forced to throw into our strength. In a game that is close, our defense gets destroyed by a team willing to run the football. We have really mixed good offense with horrible defense. It is easy to play an opportunistic defense when the other team has to put up a lot of points in a hurry.
SupremeHustle wrote:Salmons might shoot us out of games, but SJAX shoots people out of parking lots. Think about it.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,785
And1: 27,354
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints 

Post#476 » by trwi7 » Mon Oct 27, 2014 3:32 am

We lost by one less point than the last time we played in New Orleans! Moral victory.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
raysbookclub
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,791
And1: 1,273
Joined: Jan 26, 2008
     

Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints 

Post#477 » by raysbookclub » Mon Oct 27, 2014 3:34 am

Bad games...

Adams (pass interference at the 1, helping force a FG instead of a TD; not getting enough for the first down that led to the turnover-on-downs; stopping on the route leading to an INT)

House (terrible in run support; questionable PI call on a long ball; did he have a pass defended?)

ILBs (as usual, when your D can't stop the run between the hashes and can't defend TE's, it usually means you have bad ILB play)
User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 62,883
And1: 41,260
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints 

Post#478 » by emunney » Mon Oct 27, 2014 3:36 am

Balls2TheWalls wrote:
emunney wrote:
ampd wrote:We've given up 44 points and 500 yards en route to not forcing a punt for the 2nd time this year.


We won the other game 38-17. D really let us down.


This is really a red herring. In any game where we get ahead, the other team is forced to throw into our strength. In a game that is close, our defense gets destroyed by a team willing to run the football. We have really mixed good offense with horrible defense. It is easy to play an opportunistic defense when the other team has to put up a lot of points in a hurry.


It's too bad you can't adjust the facts to fit your theory. That would make everything extremely simple.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 16,287
And1: 7,382
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints 

Post#479 » by FAH1223 » Mon Oct 27, 2014 4:03 am

[tweet]https://twitter.com/robdemovsky/status/526575050150133760[/tweet]

Shades of November 2013
Image

Return to Green Bay Packers