Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation
Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints
- emunney
- RealGM
- Posts: 62,883
- And1: 41,260
- Joined: Feb 22, 2005
- Location: where takes go to be pampered
Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints
Man, we're only a half game ahead of the Seahawks for the wildcard after tonight. Schneider must have shaken TT's hand this offseason.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 1,474
- And1: 117
- Joined: Aug 08, 2012
Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints
Problem is this team is soft and if you can irritate Rodgers you get a automatic win.
Rodgers is the most gifted QB int he NFL but he is not a leader. When things don't go right it gets ugly. Or when the game gets tough the Packers roll over. Team has 0 leaders and very little vets if any.
Rodgers is the most gifted QB int he NFL but he is not a leader. When things don't go right it gets ugly. Or when the game gets tough the Packers roll over. Team has 0 leaders and very little vets if any.
Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,636
- And1: 4,556
- Joined: Aug 23, 2009
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints
Saints will win their division at 8-8 or 7-9 and host a playoff game. That isn't right.
Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,343
- And1: 4,113
- Joined: Jun 25, 2005
-
Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints
Greatness wrote:Saints will win their division at 8-8 or 7-9 and host a playoff game. That isn't right.
Meh, the Packers did it last year. We definitely didn't deserve to host the 49ers.
SupremeHustle wrote:Salmons might shoot us out of games, but SJAX shoots people out of parking lots. Think about it.
Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints
- ampd
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,607
- And1: 5,049
- Joined: Dec 06, 2010
Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints
emunney wrote:ampd wrote:emunney wrote:
He drafted Rodgers, too, and that bum's thrown 2 key interceptions today. Fire them both.
At some ppint someone has to be held accountable for the d being bad year after year. It's probaby not going to start with TT or mccarthy
The D isn't bad this year. They've had some good games and some bad games. They're average. That is what average looks like.
We've given up 44 points and 500 yards en route to not forcing a punt for the 2nd time this year.
Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints
- MartyConlonOnTheRun
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,472
- And1: 13,291
- Joined: Jun 27, 2006
- Location: Section 212 - Raising havoc in Squad 6
Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints
Who has the stronger arm right now? Flynn or Rodgers?
Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,636
- And1: 4,556
- Joined: Aug 23, 2009
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints
Balls2TheWalls wrote:Greatness wrote:Saints will win their division at 8-8 or 7-9 and host a playoff game. That isn't right.
Meh, the Packers did it last year. We definitely didn't deserve to host the 49ers.
I agree. I just don't like the idea of division winners automatically hosting a playoff game. Us included.
Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints
- BigDee
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,180
- And1: 1,383
- Joined: Jul 11, 2006
- Location: Wisconsin
-
Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints
Nice job Flynn.
Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,343
- And1: 4,113
- Joined: Jun 25, 2005
-
Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints
Haha, Flynn sucks. We deserve to have 50 put up on us tonight. Hopefully we give up another long run to Mark Ingram.
SupremeHustle wrote:Salmons might shoot us out of games, but SJAX shoots people out of parking lots. Think about it.
Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints
- MickeyDavis
- Global Mod
- Posts: 103,133
- And1: 55,667
- Joined: May 02, 2002
- Location: The Craps Table
-
Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,343
- And1: 4,113
- Joined: Jun 25, 2005
-
Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints
Wow we are a part of 66% of the puntless games in NFL history: this year. Hahahahhaa holy **** that is awful.
SupremeHustle wrote:Salmons might shoot us out of games, but SJAX shoots people out of parking lots. Think about it.
Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints
- Bernman
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,902
- And1: 8,404
- Joined: Aug 05, 2004
-
Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints
Godgers wrote:Problem is this team is soft and if you can irritate Rodgers you get a automatic win.
Rodgers is the most gifted QB int he NFL but he is not a leader. When things don't go right it gets ugly. Or when the game gets tough the Packers roll over. Team has 0 leaders and very little vets if any.
Either you're a Skip Bayless-esque troll, or Skip Bayless-esque idiot. I can't tell with either of you. Either way it's lame.
The only thing that was irritated was Rodgers' hamstring.
Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints
- emunney
- RealGM
- Posts: 62,883
- And1: 41,260
- Joined: Feb 22, 2005
- Location: where takes go to be pampered
Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints
ampd wrote:emunney wrote:ampd wrote:At some ppint someone has to be held accountable for the d being bad year after year. It's probaby not going to start with TT or mccarthy
The D isn't bad this year. They've had some good games and some bad games. They're average. That is what average looks like.
We've given up 44 points and 500 yards en route to not forcing a punt for the 2nd time this year.
We won the other game 38-17. D really let us down.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,785
- And1: 27,352
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints
Godgers wrote:Rodgers is the most gifted QB int he NFL but he is not a leader.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1aYN5XpWzpM[/youtube]
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,343
- And1: 4,113
- Joined: Jun 25, 2005
-
Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints
emunney wrote:ampd wrote:emunney wrote:
The D isn't bad this year. They've had some good games and some bad games. They're average. That is what average looks like.
We've given up 44 points and 500 yards en route to not forcing a punt for the 2nd time this year.
We won the other game 38-17. D really let us down.
This is really a red herring. In any game where we get ahead, the other team is forced to throw into our strength. In a game that is close, our defense gets destroyed by a team willing to run the football. We have really mixed good offense with horrible defense. It is easy to play an opportunistic defense when the other team has to put up a lot of points in a hurry.
SupremeHustle wrote:Salmons might shoot us out of games, but SJAX shoots people out of parking lots. Think about it.
Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,785
- And1: 27,352
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints
We lost by one less point than the last time we played in New Orleans! Moral victory.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,791
- And1: 1,273
- Joined: Jan 26, 2008
-
Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints
Bad games...
Adams (pass interference at the 1, helping force a FG instead of a TD; not getting enough for the first down that led to the turnover-on-downs; stopping on the route leading to an INT)
House (terrible in run support; questionable PI call on a long ball; did he have a pass defended?)
ILBs (as usual, when your D can't stop the run between the hashes and can't defend TE's, it usually means you have bad ILB play)
Adams (pass interference at the 1, helping force a FG instead of a TD; not getting enough for the first down that led to the turnover-on-downs; stopping on the route leading to an INT)
House (terrible in run support; questionable PI call on a long ball; did he have a pass defended?)
ILBs (as usual, when your D can't stop the run between the hashes and can't defend TE's, it usually means you have bad ILB play)
Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints
- emunney
- RealGM
- Posts: 62,883
- And1: 41,260
- Joined: Feb 22, 2005
- Location: where takes go to be pampered
Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints
Balls2TheWalls wrote:emunney wrote:ampd wrote:We've given up 44 points and 500 yards en route to not forcing a punt for the 2nd time this year.
We won the other game 38-17. D really let us down.
This is really a red herring. In any game where we get ahead, the other team is forced to throw into our strength. In a game that is close, our defense gets destroyed by a team willing to run the football. We have really mixed good offense with horrible defense. It is easy to play an opportunistic defense when the other team has to put up a lot of points in a hurry.
It's too bad you can't adjust the facts to fit your theory. That would make everything extremely simple.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints
- FAH1223
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,287
- And1: 7,382
- Joined: Nov 01, 2005
- Location: Laurel, MD
-
Re: Game Thread - Pack vs. Saints
[tweet]https://twitter.com/robdemovsky/status/526575050150133760[/tweet]
Shades of November 2013
Shades of November 2013
