tski1972 wrote:I thought we couldn't do any deals with the Nets anyway because of Kidd.
That's correct sorry...
Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis
tski1972 wrote:I thought we couldn't do any deals with the Nets anyway because of Kidd.
Bucks_MacGyver wrote:Would you guys be down with this trade at the deadline.
Nets trade :
Kevin garnett
2015 1st round pick
2017 1st round pick
Bucks trade:
Brandon Knight
Ersan
I think kg would be ok to play for Kidd. This only works of the nets are out of playoff contention and the bucks are in. Kg has to ok it
Gives us lots of cap room
Jkam31 wrote:Would you guys do a Stauaskas for mayo deal
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
trwi7 wrote:Jkam31 wrote:Would you guys do a Stauaskas for mayo deal
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Yeah
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Jkam31 wrote:trwi7 wrote:Jkam31 wrote:Would you guys do a Stauaskas for mayo deal
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Yeah
Which one of your bigs would you most likely package when DWill is added. We would probably want Zaza or Henson preferably Henson.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums

Nebula1 wrote:Rockets could use Ilyasova and Henson.
Jkam31 wrote:Actually Stauaskas/DWill for mayo/ersan
raferfenix wrote:Jkam31 wrote:Actually Stauaskas/DWill for mayo/ersan
Would love it if Mayo has remotely this kind of value.
He has been great here but given the risk that he falls back into bad habits (like he did after his hot start in Dallas) I'd likely sell-high if given the opportunity.
Also Sacramento taking on Ersan is a lot to hope for even though he's picking up his game of late. Kings have a lot of big salaries up front already too, so suspect we'd be taking back Thompson in this kind of deal. We could probably use his help if we are trading a big man as is.
Jkam31 wrote:I really doubt we trade thompson unless the PF coming back is a starter actually I'd be pissed if he's traded he has been A+ on defense and we need him for all the PFs in the west.
We probably do a Nik/DWill for mayo/zaza or Henson cause we desperately need a big off the bench with size to pair with Landry and we need scoring off the bench. With an average bench we would be 10-2 right now with the hardest strength of schedule.
I think a deal with you guys might happen cause we were linked together in the offseason. Last time we were linked with teams in the offseason a trade between us happen just not for the players rumored to be in it.
Captain_Caveman wrote:Captain_Caveman wrote:sam_I_am wrote:I guess the debate is over. Danny has let the rest of league know that Rondo will not be traded.
http://www.si.com/nba/2014/11/19/boston ... ajon-rondo
To quote one of my favorite posters...... WTF lock this.
Ainge is still denying that he is going to trade Toine... the first time.
He said things about Toine as an announcer, but the point is that Ainge as GM said repeatedly that there was no trade, all the way up until he traded him. As he has done with every other trade. Standard operating procedure with anyone, but Ainge is pretty next level with it.
There is zero reason to take anything he says at face value, even secondhand as in this case. Be serious... Ainge would have traded Rondo like 5,000 times in the last 6 years if he could have ever gotten fair value for him. If dude could get a top 10 pick in next year's draft for Rondo, he'd be driving him to Logan right now.