ImageImageImage

The Trade Thread - v2

Moderators: Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites, dVs33

ImHeisenberg
Head Coach
Posts: 6,465
And1: 2,323
Joined: Apr 01, 2013
 

Re: The Trade Thread - v2 

Post#1121 » by ImHeisenberg » Thu Dec 11, 2014 5:18 pm

princeofpalace wrote:
ImHeisenberg wrote:I made a thread about the value of signing Teague the summer we traded for Jennings. The notion was blown out of the water. He's averaging 17 PPG, 7 assists with a 21.72 PER.

Oh well.


Props
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=1254198

Looking back over it, most of those responses were fairly pro-Teague, people were just put off with him being a RFA.

Hindsight is 20/20, and nobody made him an offer and he settled on a very reasonable deal to stay in ATL. We definitely signed the wrong Hawk that summer.
mattao313
General Manager
Posts: 9,587
And1: 4,464
Joined: Aug 29, 2014
       

Re: The Trade Thread - v2 

Post#1122 » by mattao313 » Thu Dec 11, 2014 8:16 pm

Would Houston trade for Josh smith?
Championships
Bravenewworld
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,617
And1: 934
Joined: Jul 02, 2010

Re: The Trade Thread - v2 

Post#1123 » by Bravenewworld » Thu Dec 11, 2014 9:16 pm

Blkbrd671 wrote:yes you'd be the only one


1.) Ainge is going to ask for everyone and the kitchen sink
2.) Detroit lacks floor spacer, Rondo does not eleviate that problem
3.) Rondo isn't Carrying Boston to any playoff runs, why would he do so in detroit
4.) Rondo coming to detroit means Josh smith reunites with his best friend, meaning Smith stays in Detroit. Detroit fan base does not want josh smith.


So no, Rondo to detroit is not wanted. Green for Smith however. F* YA


1. Rondo will be traded by the all star break and the Celtics know they wont get a great deal for him. Im willing to bet the Pistons could combine whats-his-face=PG, Singleton and a pick for him. Realistically no one has made a better offer (at least known) and Ainge wont lose him for nothing.
Personally i think the Pistons could have him for fairly cheap. Although DWill might also be a solid option as he looks like a Van Gundy type PG.

2. Not one trade or one line up change would solve all this teams issues, but having a top 3-5 PG on this team would definitely be a step in the right direction.

3. Rondo is a traditional PG that works very well with talent surrounding him. Something he completely lacks in Boston. He has helped carry the Celtics in playoff series and has multiple finals and ECFs experience. He also seems to do a good job at bringing teammates together and could probably get the most out of this line up. IMO he could also get Drummond to that next level and help ground Smith.

4. I don't even know how to address this. Seems rather petty and silly imo.

5. Celtics would not do Smith for Green unless there was a rebuilding incentive.
I have a couple trades for detroit worked out that ill post in a separate post.
User avatar
Pharaoh
RealGM
Posts: 16,450
And1: 4,747
Joined: Aug 10, 2001

Re: The Trade Thread - v2 

Post#1124 » by Pharaoh » Thu Dec 11, 2014 10:50 pm

ImHeisenberg wrote:
Pharaoh wrote:Cause I'm drunk:

A team consisting of:

Lawson (or Teague or Holiday)
Matthews (or Afflalo or Redick)
Corey Brewer (or Shumpert)
David West (or Terrence Jones)
& Drummond

**** all over what we've got!

It's up to SVG & Bower to bring in not only players that fit but dudes who will bring it every day/night

Sent from my GT-I9300 using RealGM Forums mobile app

I made a thread about the value of signing Teague the summer we traded for Jennings. The notion was blown out of the water. He's averaging 17 PPG, 7 assists with a 21.72 PER.

Oh well.


We should have replaced Dumars dude! Team would be so much better off if Gores didn't give him one last chance

Sent from my GT-I9300 using RealGM Forums mobile app
DetroitSho
Head Coach
Posts: 6,991
And1: 2,522
Joined: Sep 28, 2012

Re: The Trade Thread - v2 

Post#1125 » by DetroitSho » Thu Dec 11, 2014 11:05 pm

ImHeisenberg wrote:
Pharaoh wrote:Cause I'm drunk:

A team consisting of:

Lawson (or Teague or Holiday)
Matthews (or Afflalo or Redick)
Corey Brewer (or Shumpert)
David West (or Terrence Jones)
& Drummond

**** all over what we've got!

It's up to SVG & Bower to bring in not only players that fit but dudes who will bring it every day/night

Sent from my GT-I9300 using RealGM Forums mobile app

I made a thread about the value of signing Teague the summer we traded for Jennings. The notion was blown out of the water. He's averaging 17 PPG, 7 assists with a 21.72 PER.

Oh well.

Would you have been willing to pay Teague $12 million/year?
User avatar
Blkbrd671
RealGM
Posts: 30,862
And1: 4,819
Joined: Oct 05, 2010
Location: Guam,USA
       

Re: The Trade Thread - v2 

Post#1126 » by Blkbrd671 » Fri Dec 12, 2014 12:23 am

Bravenewworld wrote:
1. Rondo will be traded by the all star break and the Celtics know they wont get a great deal for him. Im willing to bet the Pistons could combine whats-his-face=PG, Singleton and a pick for him. Realistically no one has made a better offer (at least known) and Ainge wont lose him for nothing.
Personally i think the Pistons could have him for fairly cheap. Although DWill might also be a solid option as he looks like a Van Gundy type PG.


Detroits not looking to give up future assets for a rental. Ainge has always asked for a ridiculous amount in his trades. Its a no go for detroit

2. Not one trade or one line up change would solve all this teams issues, but having a top 3-5 PG on this team would definitely be a step in the right direction.


1. Yes a upgrade at pg would definitely help this team as a upgrade at any position would
2. Rondo/KCP/Smith/Monroe/Dre...... only one player can hit a shot outside of the 3 poitn arc. As i said, Rondo isn't carrying Boston to any championships, why would he magically help detroit take that next step?

3. Rondo is a traditional PG that works very well with talent surrounding him. Something he completely lacks in Boston. He has helped carry the Celtics in playoff series and has multiple finals and ECFs experience. He also seems to do a good job at bringing teammates together and could probably get the most out of this line up. IMO he could also get Drummond to that next level and help ground Smith.


Most of Rondo's success came when he was surrounded by 3 perennial allstars, that all complimented each other. Rondo was a perfect role player in a perfect system for their personnel. Since then, what has rondo really done? Again i am not arguing Rondo wouldn't improve this team, i am arguing that he'd minimally improve this team. Detroit's roster and Bostons roster are similar in talent. We basically would jsut get a lower draft pick.

4. I don't even know how to address this. Seems rather petty and silly imo.



That's because your not a pistons fan and have to watch Smith for the past 2-3 years. Majority of Detroits fans are done with the J Smith era, and i think our FO knows this. Any trade that leads to smith staying on this team longer, would cause our fan base to erupt.

5. Celtics would not do Smith for Green unless there was a rebuilding incentive.
I have a couple trades for detroit worked out that ill post in a separate post.


Detroit has no incentive to give up young or future assets. As with Rondo, Green doesn't make us that much better. We wouldn't give up future assets to be minimally better, and as with Rondo. He's not historically a good shooter behind the arc
Bravenewworld
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,617
And1: 934
Joined: Jul 02, 2010

Re: The Trade Thread - v2 

Post#1127 » by Bravenewworld » Fri Dec 12, 2014 2:33 am

Blkbrd671 wrote:Detroits not looking to give up future assets for a rental. Ainge has always asked for a ridiculous amount in his trades. Its a no go for detroit


And as we have seen before he will still move players when it comes down to moving or losing.


Blkbrd671 wrote:2. Rondo/KCP/Smith/Monroe/Dre...... only one player can hit a shot outside of the 3 poitn arc. As i said, Rondo isn't carrying Boston to any championships, why would he magically help detroit take that next step?


Rondo has helped carry the Celtics to a title as well as a finals and multiple ECFs.
I mean, im not sure what your suggesting here.
If you cant get a player who has proven to carry their team to championships, then why bother?
If you are on a rebuilding team and intentionally being sat for half the season, yet not creating a contending team then..... we ignore the players talent, accomplishments and obvious abilities?
Are you saying this team's next step is a championship?
I mean... i dunno, i really have no idea where you're going with this or why you seem to want to dismiss what we know he can do.


Blkbrd671 wrote:Most of Rondo's success came when he was surrounded by 3 perennial allstars, that all complimented each other. Rondo was a perfect role player in a perfect system for their personnel. Since then, what has rondo really done? Again i am not arguing Rondo wouldn't improve this team, i am arguing that he'd minimally improve this team. Detroit's roster and Bostons roster are similar in talent. We basically would jsut get a lower draft pick.


During and since he has been one of the best PGs in the game (when healthy). Even this year he is putting up fantastic numbers with partial minutes and intentionally being removed when a winning situation is in place.

This is a PG who is one of the best in the game at getting players the ball where they are best at scoring. As we have seen with him, the more capable of player the better and no, Detroit and Bostons roster are nothing alike. Detroit has players in their prime, right out of their prime, ready to enter their prime, and the Celtics are in full rebuild mode with a bunch of players who are overproducing simply because someone has to. We wont see Sully go to the Spurs and be a near 20-10. Bradley is poor mans 6th player material on another team. Green is really the only one out of that bunch who could go someplace else and do what he is doing there.


That's because your not a pistons fan and have to watch Smith for the past 2-3 years. Majority of Detroits fans are done with the J Smith era, and i think our FO knows this. Any trade that leads to smith staying on this team longer, would cause our fan base to erupt.


I feel the need to point out that Detroit has had Smith for 1 full year, not 2 or 3.

Anyway, the thing i dont get is your reaction and what you said.
I mean... happier near all-star with happier all star point guard, seems to me like it would be a positive situation for Detroit and with Smith most likely improving (even though he is not doing badly now) his team value would increase. You can like or dislike him but you disliking him is not going to make them trade him or make another team accept him in a trade, so you might as well attempt to improve the situation while he is there.

BTW, My eastern team i used to root for was the Hawks and i did watch Smith for the majority of his career. Im well aware of his tendencies, pro's, con's. Yah, we can list some negatives to his play style, but at the end of the day he is still an extremely good player.

Detroit has no incentive to give up young or future assets. As with Rondo, Green doesn't make us that much better. We wouldn't give up future assets to be minimally better, and as with Rondo. He's not historically a good shooter behind the arc


Honestly man, i really don't know what to say.
A roster of Rondo - Meeks - Green - Smith - Drummond being coached by Van Gundy is an ECF team, year 1. They would need some good depth players to be contenders but...whatever.
I just... i dunno. No one said Rondo is a shooter, his offensive value is ten times what it would be if he was just a shooter. I understand you feel Detroit lacks shooters but that does not mean that has to be the only thing to work on or we ignore what would be an extremely good situation for Detroit, simply because Rondo is not a shooter... that makes no sense to me.
How about this... You take Reggie Jackson(S+T), OKC takes Rondo(S+T) and you give Celtics Monroe. I mean... i'd be more then happy to take on a triple double machine at the point who has no problem averaging 10+apg and is an A defender.
User avatar
Blkbrd671
RealGM
Posts: 30,862
And1: 4,819
Joined: Oct 05, 2010
Location: Guam,USA
       

Re: The Trade Thread - v2 

Post#1128 » by Blkbrd671 » Fri Dec 12, 2014 3:16 am

Bravenewworld wrote:
And as we have seen before he will still move players when it comes down to moving or losing.


He's also stated he's not looking for a quick fix, and i should restate as Detroits not giving up future assets for minimal upgrade. Rondo doesn't gurantee winning.




Rondo has helped carry the Celtics to a title as well as a finals and multiple ECFs.
I mean, im not sure what your suggesting here.
If you cant get a player who has proven to carry their team to championships, then why bother?
If you are on a rebuilding team and intentionally being sat for half the season, yet not creating a contending team then..... we ignore the players talent, accomplishments and obvious abilities?
Are you saying this team's next step is a championship?
I mean... i dunno, i really have no idea where you're going with this or why you seem to want to dismiss what we know he can do.


I am not trying to dismiss what he's done, i am just merely pointing out the truth that his Playoff and title runs are directly linked to being surrounded by 3 perenial allstars. Since that point , rondo hasn't even sniffed the finals. To say he carried any team if laughable, he was perfect compliment to the 3 players that carried the team.



During and since he has been one of the best PGs in the game (when healthy). Even this year he is putting up fantastic numbers with partial minutes and intentionally being removed when a winning situation is in place.


Okay and how has that translated to wins for Boston?

This is a PG who is one of the best in the game at getting players the ball where they are best at scoring. As we have seen with him, the more capable of player the better and no, Detroit and Bostons roster are nothing alike. Detroit has players in their prime, right out of their prime, ready to enter their prime, and the Celtics are in full rebuild mode with a bunch of players who are overproducing simply because someone has to. We wont see Sully go to the Spurs and be a near 20-10. Bradley is poor mans 6th player material on another team. Green is really the only one out of that bunch who could go someplace else and do what he is doing there.


lol, lets just leave it at Bos and Detroit both have crap rosters. Blaming Bos roster for Rondo's lack of success is really reaching. Rondo hasn't succeeded because he has flaws , such as he can't shoot and that will always hold him back.



I feel the need to point out that Detroit has had Smith for 1 full year, not 2 or 3.


Therefore enforing my point, it hasn't even been 2 years and Detroits fans based doesn't want him.

Anyway, the thing i dont get is your reaction and what you said.
I mean... happier near all-star with happier all star point guard, seems to me like it would be a positive situation for Detroit and with Smith most likely improving (even though he is not doing badly now) his team value would increase. You can like or dislike him but you disliking him is not going to make them trade him or make another team accept him in a trade, so you might as well attempt to improve the situation while he is there.


Because your unintentionally assuming you know anything about our team. I watch majority if not every game, Smith is a ready now piece, on a not so ready roster. He doesn't compliment our bigs, and the fan base has had it with him. While my personal dislike of him may not have any weight, gettin boo'd by the palace everytime he touches the ball might. Like i said, you don't know our teams situation.

BTW, My eastern team i used to root for was the Hawks and i did watch Smith for the majority of his career. Im well aware of his tendencies, pro's, con's. Yah, we can list some negatives to his play style, but at the end of the day he is still an extremely good player.


Refer to my previous comment, you don't know anything about our teams situation. Imagine smith on the hawks playing SF all year, then being moved to power forward, but still playing like a small forward. Now imagine that smith 3 years older, and that's who we have. I am one of few ppl that think smith is still a good player if he plays with in his game, and truthfully he has improved slowly over this season. HOWEVER , he's not a future piece on this team, he doesn't compliment our future pieces, and his entitled attitude has worn thin.



Honestly man, i really don't know what to say.
A roster of Rondo - Meeks - Green - Smith - Drummond being coached by Van Gundy is an ECF team, year 1. They would need some good depth players to be contenders but...whatever.
I just... i dunno. No one said Rondo is a shooter, his offensive value is ten times what it would be if he was just a shooter. I understand you feel Detroit lacks shooters but that does not mean that has to be the only thing to work on or we ignore what would be an extremely good situation for Detroit, simply because Rondo is not a shooter... that makes no sense to me.


Again you keep assuming you know anything about our team when you post, when you should just admit you know nothing which is evident from your post.

1.) we need floor spacing, SVG values shooting and 3 point shooting. Rondo is not a SVG point guard.
2.) We have 3 big man who can't score outside the paint, add 2 more players who can't space teh floor is a receipe for disaster. Our fan base is tired of watching the ball get passed to a wide open player that is spotting up outside his range.
3.) Again, your in this dream world where you think that Rondo and Green = Contenders, when they haven't done jack sh* for Bos.
4.) This would be a extremely poor situation for detroit
---We keep smith
--We become a worst shooting team
--We get more wins putting us mid lotto
*This does not make sense to detroit

How about this... You take Reggie Jackson(S+T), OKC takes Rondo(S+T) and you give Celtics Monroe. I mean... i'd be more then happy to take on a triple double machine at the point who has no problem averaging 10+apg and is an A defender.


Monroe is not giving up his birds rights, pretty sure salaries don't work, and Detroit has 2 point guards already, if we are receiving one, we should be trading another. We don't need any more guards, we need SF's and PF's that can shoot and Defend
User avatar
MrBigShot
RealGM
Posts: 18,822
And1: 20,522
Joined: Dec 18, 2010
 

Re: The Trade Thread - v2 

Post#1129 » by MrBigShot » Fri Dec 12, 2014 5:37 am

Bravenewworld wrote:[

Honestly man, i really don't know what to say.
A roster of Rondo - Meeks - Green - Smith - Drummond being coached by Van Gundy is an ECF team, year 1.


I like Green a lot and think Rondo has been underrated since his injury, but I think most, if not all, piston fans will agree that Smith should not be apart of our future.
"They say you miss 100% of the shots you take" - Mike James
User avatar
Entourage27
Sophomore
Posts: 104
And1: 19
Joined: May 18, 2014
   

Re: The Trade Thread - v2 

Post#1130 » by Entourage27 » Fri Dec 12, 2014 6:56 am

Pistons trade Greg Monroe, Josh Smith Brandon Jennings and Tony Mitchell to the Lakers for Jeremy Lin, Steve Nash, Nick Young and Robert Sacre

Why Pistons do it?
We're losing Monroe so might as well trade him along with the toxic players on our team Jennings and Smith for cap space in Lin and Nash. We get Swaggy P for the next couple years on a small contract and maybe something can happen wit him.

Why Lakers do it?
They need talent and taking the gamble of Smith and Jennings is worth Monroe.
User avatar
Pharaoh
RealGM
Posts: 16,450
And1: 4,747
Joined: Aug 10, 2001

Re: The Trade Thread - v2 

Post#1131 » by Pharaoh » Fri Dec 12, 2014 7:29 am

Brewer & Bazz for Jerebko & Datome?

Sent from my GT-I9300 using RealGM Forums mobile app
ImHeisenberg
Head Coach
Posts: 6,465
And1: 2,323
Joined: Apr 01, 2013
 

Re: The Trade Thread - v2 

Post#1132 » by ImHeisenberg » Fri Dec 12, 2014 12:01 pm

DetroitSho wrote:
ImHeisenberg wrote:
Pharaoh wrote:Cause I'm drunk:

A team consisting of:

Lawson (or Teague or Holiday)
Matthews (or Afflalo or Redick)
Corey Brewer (or Shumpert)
David West (or Terrence Jones)
& Drummond

**** all over what we've got!

It's up to SVG & Bower to bring in not only players that fit but dudes who will bring it every day/night

Sent from my GT-I9300 using RealGM Forums mobile app

I made a thread about the value of signing Teague the summer we traded for Jennings. The notion was blown out of the water. He's averaging 17 PPG, 7 assists with a 21.72 PER.

Oh well.

Would you have been willing to pay Teague $12 million/year?

My cap probably would have been $11 per season, 4 years.

That was when Detroit was supposed to be on an upswing. Now? We're drilling into the Earth just so we have more room to sink.
ImHeisenberg
Head Coach
Posts: 6,465
And1: 2,323
Joined: Apr 01, 2013
 

Re: The Trade Thread - v2 

Post#1133 » by ImHeisenberg » Fri Dec 12, 2014 12:23 pm

Houston looking to use their $8+ million trade exception.

Josh Smith to Houston for the exception and Jason Terry (who will probably throw a fit and never report to Detroit).
mattao313
General Manager
Posts: 9,587
And1: 4,464
Joined: Aug 29, 2014
       

Re: The Trade Thread - v2 

Post#1134 » by mattao313 » Fri Dec 12, 2014 12:26 pm

ImHeisenberg wrote:Houston looking to use their $8+ million trade exception.

Josh Smith to Houston for the exception and Jason Terry (who will probably throw a fit and never report to Detroit).

I wonder if they would really do this I remember hear rumor they wanted him when they first got D12.
Championships
ImHeisenberg
Head Coach
Posts: 6,465
And1: 2,323
Joined: Apr 01, 2013
 

Re: The Trade Thread - v2 

Post#1135 » by ImHeisenberg » Fri Dec 12, 2014 12:31 pm

mattao313 wrote:
ImHeisenberg wrote:Houston looking to use their $8+ million trade exception.

Josh Smith to Houston for the exception and Jason Terry (who will probably throw a fit and never report to Detroit).

I wonder if they would really do this I remember hear rumor they wanted him when they first got D12.


What other player could they get with giving up so little?

I don't know if SVG would go for this- but the Pistons fan base certainly would.
rmfc
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,918
And1: 936
Joined: Jul 19, 2009
     

Re: The Trade Thread - v2 

Post#1136 » by rmfc » Fri Dec 12, 2014 1:50 pm

Pharaoh wrote:Brewer & Bazz for Jerebko & Datome?

Sent from my GT-I9300 using RealGM Forums mobile app


Not sure why the wolves would have any interest in making this deal but I love it for the Pistons.
DetroitSho
Head Coach
Posts: 6,991
And1: 2,522
Joined: Sep 28, 2012

Re: The Trade Thread - v2 

Post#1137 » by DetroitSho » Fri Dec 12, 2014 5:09 pm

ImHeisenberg wrote:
DetroitSho wrote:
ImHeisenberg wrote:I made a thread about the value of signing Teague the summer we traded for Jennings. The notion was blown out of the water. He's averaging 17 PPG, 7 assists with a 21.72 PER.

Oh well.

Would you have been willing to pay Teague $12 million/year?

My cap probably would have been $11 per season, 4 years.

That was when Detroit was supposed to be on an upswing. Now? We're drilling into the Earth just so we have more room to sink.

I only ask because I'm thinking it would've taken at least 12 million for Atlanta to not match. I think it's easy to look and see we're paying Jennings 8 million and Teague is getting 8 million and say we should've went after him. Not saying you're saying that. But with your own words of what you would pay, I can't say we would've gotten him.
DetroitSho
Head Coach
Posts: 6,991
And1: 2,522
Joined: Sep 28, 2012

Re: The Trade Thread - v2 

Post#1138 » by DetroitSho » Fri Dec 12, 2014 5:10 pm

ImHeisenberg wrote:Houston looking to use their $8+ million trade exception.

Josh Smith to Houston for the exception and Jason Terry (who will probably throw a fit and never report to Detroit).

Did the rules change and you can combine TPE with players in trades now?
User avatar
LukasBMW
Suns Forum SlamDRUNK Contributor
Posts: 4,827
And1: 4,291
Joined: Jun 21, 2007
Location: Phoenix AZ & San Diego CA
 

Re: The Trade Thread - v2 

Post#1139 » by LukasBMW » Fri Dec 12, 2014 8:47 pm

Suns fan here. I come in peace.

We need a center and you need to get rid of Josh Smith.

If we were to take the contract of Josh Smith and compensate us with Andre Drummond, what would you want in return?

Alex Len and Eric Bledsoe are off limits. Everyone else is game.

Our future DRAFT PICKS:
-Our first round picks
-The Lakers first round pick (top 5 protected this year, but that protection drops to top 3 next year)
-A future top 12 protected pick from Minnesota
Image
User avatar
MrBigShot
RealGM
Posts: 18,822
And1: 20,522
Joined: Dec 18, 2010
 

Re: The Trade Thread - v2 

Post#1140 » by MrBigShot » Fri Dec 12, 2014 9:12 pm

Giving up Drummond is way too much compensation for taking Smith off of our hands, even if we were getting a pick or two back (and not a top 5 one I might add). It would be even worse than the Ben Gordon trade where we gave up a pick to Charlotte for taking him off of our hands instead of just amnestying him. If I was SVG, it's not something I'd consider.

If we are getting rid of Smith I'm okay with getting nothing notable in return (like the Terry/TPE trade or the Derrick Williams/Thompson kings trade), but not with giving up assets just go unload him.
"They say you miss 100% of the shots you take" - Mike James

Return to Detroit Pistons