Trade Targets (postcript on yesterday-other teams)
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
Re: Trade Targets
- Badgerlander
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,066
- And1: 7,488
- Joined: Jun 29, 2007
-
Re: Trade Targets
Mitch McGary
Shoot, Move, and Communicate...
Countless waze, we pass the daze...
A little nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men.
Spoiler:
Countless waze, we pass the daze...
A little nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men.
Re: Trade Targets
-
EastSideBucksFan
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,710
- And1: 4,490
- Joined: Jan 31, 2006
- Contact:
-
Re: Trade Targets
I wonder if the Thunder could get talked into Brandon Knight & Ersan for Reggie Jackson & Mitch McGary.
That would be a dream trade for me.
That would be a dream trade for me.
Re: Trade Targets
- paulpressey25
- Senior Mod - Bucks

- Posts: 62,877
- And1: 30,149
- Joined: Oct 27, 2002
-
Re: Trade Targets
All these names are interesting and we need to pursue them. But at the the end of the day, we need another top five pick. Any trades should be made with a view to improving our tank this year and maybe even next year.
None of us can predict how Jabari comes back from this. Ten Clint Capela's don't add up to one Jabari even though we also need the Clint Capela's.
None of us can predict how Jabari comes back from this. Ten Clint Capela's don't add up to one Jabari even though we also need the Clint Capela's.
Re: Trade Targets
- JayMKE
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,432
- And1: 17,278
- Joined: Jun 21, 2010
- Location: LA
-
Re: Trade Targets
EastSideBucksFan wrote:I wonder if the Thunder could get talked into Brandon Knight & Ersan for Reggie Jackson & Mitch McGary.
That would be a dream trade for me.
I dunno, doesn't really move the needle for me and I don't want to pay Reggie Jackson. Seems like a very marginal trade to me.
FREE GIANNIS
Re: Trade Targets
-
Newz
- Banned User
- Posts: 42,327
- And1: 2,551
- Joined: Dec 05, 2005
Re: Trade Targets
paulpressey25 wrote:All these names are interesting and we need to pursue them. But at the the end of the day, we need another top five pick. Any trades should be made with a view to improving our tank this year and maybe even next year.
None of us can predict how Jabari comes back from this. Ten Clint Capela's don't add up to one Jabari even though we also need the Clint Capela's.
I would put the odds of us getting a top 5 pick at 0%.
One, I bet we make the playoffs. Two, we already have too many wins.
I guess you could bank on a miracle and hope we move up from like the 10th-12th pick to the top 3. That doesn't seem like a very good plan though. We are kind of just **** this year.
Re: Trade Targets
- Ron Swanson
- RealGM
- Posts: 26,185
- And1: 30,225
- Joined: May 15, 2013
Re: Trade Targets
EastSideBucksFan wrote:I wonder if the Thunder could get talked into Brandon Knight & Ersan for Reggie Jackson & Mitch McGary.
That would be a dream trade for me.
I think the Thunder get the two better players in that deal, long and short term. Maybe I'm being naive, but I think there's a team out there that will give us a substantial asset for Brandon Knight. And ditto for not wanting to pay Jackson.
Re: Trade Targets
-
EastSideBucksFan
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,710
- And1: 4,490
- Joined: Jan 31, 2006
- Contact:
-
Re: Trade Targets
I think Jackson is the next Bledsoe-type in the league and I'd rather pay Jax over BK.
McGary is going to be a beast for a long time in this league too.
McGary is going to be a beast for a long time in this league too.
Re: Trade Targets
- JayMKE
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,432
- And1: 17,278
- Joined: Jun 21, 2010
- Location: LA
-
Re: Trade Targets
Next Bledsoe? Naw man, naw. Don't see it. I think him and Knight are pretty similar, maybe Jackson a little better but the real difference between the two is the teams they play on.
I want a PG that can pass and run an offense, a guy like a Rubio or Rondo or someone in that mold.
I want a PG that can pass and run an offense, a guy like a Rubio or Rondo or someone in that mold.
FREE GIANNIS
Re: Trade Targets
-
Chuck Diesel
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,587
- And1: 11,556
- Joined: May 23, 2004
Re: Trade Targets
Brandon Knight is a much better player than Reggie Jackson.
Re: Trade Targets
- M-C-G
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,527
- And1: 9,854
- Joined: Jan 13, 2013
-
Re: Trade Targets
EastSideBucksFan wrote:I think Jackson is the next Bledsoe-type in the league and I'd rather pay Jax over BK.
Overpaid restricted free agent buried on their team? Just kidding.....kind of....but not really...but yeah.
Re: Trade Targets
- M-C-G
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,527
- And1: 9,854
- Joined: Jan 13, 2013
-
Re: Trade Targets
Chuck Diesel wrote:Brandon Knight is a much better player than Reggie Jackson.
You obviously have not read the Larry's Coordination thread. Reggie Jackson would never hurt Larry's coordination.
Re: Trade Targets
-
WeekapaugGroove
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,538
- And1: 20,241
- Joined: Feb 07, 2010
Re: Trade Targets
One thing that will hurt the bucks if they go seller mode is the sheer number of other teams looking to sell. half the east is tanking and selling and out west you have the nugets wolves and probaly even the suns looking to sell. It's gonna be a buyers market.
Sent from my SM-G900V using RealGM Forums mobile app
Sent from my SM-G900V using RealGM Forums mobile app
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
Re: Trade Targets
- Matches Malone
- RealGM
- Posts: 37,569
- And1: 27,682
- Joined: Nov 23, 2005
-
Re: Trade Targets
Jackson isn't much of an upgrade from Knight and he's older.
Would rather we just draft someone like Tyus Jones or Terry Rozier and let Knight walk.
My dream scenario trade would be moving some veteran pieces to Sacramento for Ben McLemore. The Kings owner seems hell bent on making the playoffs this year and we might be able to entice them into taking some of our vets that are playing well this season. I'd even be okay taking back some dead salary as long as we can get McLemore in the deal.
Another player I would be interested in buying low is Shabazz Napier.
And lastly, we definitely need another 1st round pick. I'd move anybody with the exception of Giannis and Parker for another 1st round pick. I'm becoming more and more intrigued with international player Kristaps Porzingas.
Would rather we just draft someone like Tyus Jones or Terry Rozier and let Knight walk.
My dream scenario trade would be moving some veteran pieces to Sacramento for Ben McLemore. The Kings owner seems hell bent on making the playoffs this year and we might be able to entice them into taking some of our vets that are playing well this season. I'd even be okay taking back some dead salary as long as we can get McLemore in the deal.
Another player I would be interested in buying low is Shabazz Napier.
And lastly, we definitely need another 1st round pick. I'd move anybody with the exception of Giannis and Parker for another 1st round pick. I'm becoming more and more intrigued with international player Kristaps Porzingas.
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?
Re: Trade Targets
-
Treebeard
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,979
- And1: 1,996
- Joined: Jun 17, 2009
- Location: Out in the Driftless Area
-
Re: Trade Targets
Any update on Inglis? JOB should be ready to go, right? I don't think you hold up any deals waiting on either guy proving they belong in the NBA, but it really would be nice to know if either belong in the NBA....
For that matter, when do Ersan & Henson get re-animated from the dead?
For that matter, when do Ersan & Henson get re-animated from the dead?
*******************************************************
Re: Trade Targets
- tski1972
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,325
- And1: 3,784
- Joined: May 24, 2011
- Location: Wow-saw, WI
- Contact:
-
Re: Trade Targets
Matches Malone wrote:My dream scenario trade would be moving some veteran pieces to Sacramento for Ben McLemore. The Kings owner seems hell bent on making the playoffs this year and we might be able to entice them into taking some of our vets that are playing well this season. I'd even be okay taking back some dead salary as long as we can get McLemore in the deal.
Sacto could be ripe for the picking. No idea what is going on over there.
http://twitter.com/MarkIsOld

"Because of Giannis, the once lousy Bucks are back in the NBA conversation." - 60 Minutes

"Because of Giannis, the once lousy Bucks are back in the NBA conversation." - 60 Minutes
Re: Trade Targets
- ackypoo
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,543
- And1: 3,358
- Joined: Jan 03, 2013
-
Re: Trade Targets
- Zeezprah
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,539
- And1: 1,569
- Joined: Apr 16, 2014
- Location: How can the Bucks be real if our eyes aren't real?
-
Re: Trade Targets
i would rather have knight than reggie jackson. he's just like a worse version of knight.
i would definitely be calling sacramento also. see if you can pull off knight for mclemore.
i would definitely be calling sacramento also. see if you can pull off knight for mclemore.
Re: Trade Targets
- Ron Swanson
- RealGM
- Posts: 26,185
- And1: 30,225
- Joined: May 15, 2013
Re: Trade Targets
tski1972 wrote:Matches Malone wrote:My dream scenario trade would be moving some veteran pieces to Sacramento for Ben McLemore. The Kings owner seems hell bent on making the playoffs this year and we might be able to entice them into taking some of our vets that are playing well this season. I'd even be okay taking back some dead salary as long as we can get McLemore in the deal.
Sacto could be ripe for the picking. No idea what is going on over there.
Usually we'd assume that a high pick prospect on a rookie contract like McLemore is untouchable (he's playing great defense now), but you're right, Sacto is an absolute mess right now. I'd have to at least inquire.
Dangle Brandon Knight and the Clippers 1st for him?
Re: Trade Targets
-
jakecronus8
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,825
- And1: 8,214
- Joined: Feb 06, 2006
-
Re: Trade Targets
McLemore or Stauskas for Knight+ works for me. Any reasonable deal jettisoning Knight works for me.
Do it for Chuck
Re: Trade Targets
- Ron Swanson
- RealGM
- Posts: 26,185
- And1: 30,225
- Joined: May 15, 2013
Re: Trade Targets
I'm not ready to call Stauskas a bust after only 25 games, but my interest in him couldn't be much lower.
McLemore has a stellar 58% TS to go along with good perimeter defense. He's a guy worth giving up Knight + assets for. Knight + assets for Stauskas would be a tremendous waste.
McLemore has a stellar 58% TS to go along with good perimeter defense. He's a guy worth giving up Knight + assets for. Knight + assets for Stauskas would be a tremendous waste.










