NFL PLAYOFF 2014-15: DIVISIONAL Weekend

Post #141 » by **bwgood77** » Mon Jan 12, 2015 2:35 am

btw, I started a thread for the national championship game for tomorrow in the ncaa football forum, if people are going to watch that one tomorrow.

ash_k · Post #142 » by **ash_k** » Mon Jan 12, 2015 2:43 am

- The Most Wins in playoff History
- The Most TD passes in playoff history
- The Most Passing yards in playoff history
- The Most 4th Q comeback Wins in playoff History

- First time, a team came back from 14 twice, in playoff history

Montana's supporters (over Brady):
What else do you need?!

Lala870 · Post #143 » by **Lala870** » Mon Jan 12, 2015 3:31 am

ash_k wrote:- The Most Wins in playoff History
- The Most TD passes in playoff history
- The Most Passing yards in playoff history
- The Most 4th Q comeback Wins in playoff History

- First time, a team came back from 14 twice, in playoff history

Montana's supporters (over Brady):
What else do you need?!

0-2 since spygate by the hands of the same team. Havent wont a superbowl in a decade.

Pats fans beating their chest :nonono:

. IF the pats manage to get past Indy they will lose to Seattle.

inquisitive · Post #144 » by **inquisitive** » Mon Jan 12, 2015 3:49 am

i like the colts chances against the pats...they need to have somewhat of a decent running attack though to have a chance. i think luck will rise to the occasion again. god i love this kid.

i dont think the packers really have a chance against the shawks. they will exploit his(rodgers) injury...i think the shawks pass rush will get to rodgers quickly and often.

TheKingofSting · Post #145 » by **TheKingofSting** » Mon Jan 12, 2015 3:53 am

The refs give and the refs take away.

ash_k · Post #146 » by **ash_k** » Mon Jan 12, 2015 5:11 am

Lala870 wrote:
ash_k wrote:- The Most Wins in playoff History
- The Most TD passes in playoff history
- The Most Passing yards in playoff history
- The Most 4th Q comeback Wins in playoff History

- First time, a team came back from 14 twice, in playoff history

Montana's supporters (over Brady):
What else do you need?!

0-2 since spygate by the hands of the same team. Havent wont a superbowl in a decade.

Pats fans beating their chest . IF the pats manage to get past Indy they will lose to Seattle.

Should have added "best Winning Percentage in Regular Season History" as well

you are right though, "spygate" would have prevented a Helmet Catch and your best possession WR dropping an easy pass (and prevented that HIGH ankle sprain of Gronk)...yup it would have prevented all those, no doubt!!

the_process · Post #147 » by **the_process** » Mon Jan 12, 2015 5:21 am

The Pats have to win another SB before they get to yell from the mountaintops about Brady and how good they are,

therealbig3 · Post #148 » by **therealbig3** » Mon Jan 12, 2015 7:42 am

I don't understand this notion that Brady somehow isn't that great if he doesn't win. The fact that his team is a contender every single year despite vastly different supporting casts is proof that he's awesome. 1 team out of 32 teams win every year...not being that 1 team doesn't make you a failure. Never mind the fact that he pretty much always gets his team deep into the playoffs too. 9 AFC title games, 5 SB appearances...he's putting his team in position to be that 1 team almost every year. So they haven't won in a little while...so what? If it wasn't for two fluke plays in the last 2 SBs, he would have led them to #4 and #5...just like fluke plays in the first 3 SBs could have negated all 3 of those. Doesn't change the caliber of player he is.

dr3am · Post #149 » by **dr3am** » Mon Jan 12, 2015 1:19 pm

The Pats blew the Colts out with ease. I don't see why people think Indy is a threat to them, they had no answer for gronk at all. Ravens have always gave brady & the pats problems..it was a nice win by Indy yesterday but the Broncos & Peyton specifically have been playing terrible the entire month of December

SN: And no Brady will not surpass Montana if he beats Seattle in the SB

Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums

Higga · Post #150 » by **Higga** » Mon Jan 12, 2015 5:31 pm

therealbig3 wrote:I don't understand this notion that Brady somehow isn't that great if he doesn't win. The fact that his team is a contender every single year despite vastly different supporting casts is proof that he's awesome. 1 team out of 32 teams win every year...not being that 1 team doesn't make you a failure. Never mind the fact that he pretty much always gets his team deep into the playoffs too. 9 AFC title games, 5 SB appearances...he's putting his team in position to be that 1 team almost every year. So they haven't won in a little while...so what? If it wasn't for two fluke plays in the last 2 SBs, he would have led them to #4 and #5...just like fluke plays in the first 3 SBs could have negated all 3 of those. Doesn't change the caliber of player he is.

Agreed.

People using the fact that Brady lost two Super Bowls against him is a little silly. His team is elite every year and he was literally two wacky/fluky plays away from winning both of those games.

I've always been on the Peyton Manning side of this argument, but now I'm leaning the other way. Brady is just so damn good in the playoffs in comparison. I think if he wins the Super Bowl this year he is firmly without a doubt the GOAT QB.

therealbig3 · Post #151 » by **therealbig3** » Mon Jan 12, 2015 8:06 pm

Higga wrote:
therealbig3 wrote:I don't understand this notion that Brady somehow isn't that great if he doesn't win. The fact that his team is a contender every single year despite vastly different supporting casts is proof that he's awesome. 1 team out of 32 teams win every year...not being that 1 team doesn't make you a failure. Never mind the fact that he pretty much always gets his team deep into the playoffs too. 9 AFC title games, 5 SB appearances...he's putting his team in position to be that 1 team almost every year. So they haven't won in a little while...so what? If it wasn't for two fluke plays in the last 2 SBs, he would have led them to #4 and #5...just like fluke plays in the first 3 SBs could have negated all 3 of those. Doesn't change the caliber of player he is.

Agreed.

People using the fact that Brady lost two Super Bowls against him is a little silly. His team is elite every year and he was literally two wacky/fluky plays away from winning both of those games.

I've always been on the Peyton Manning side of this argument, but now I'm leaning the other way. Brady is just so damn good in the playoffs in comparison. I think if he wins the Super Bowl this year he is firmly without a doubt the GOAT QB.

Using SB losses against someone is literally one of the dumbest arguments ever. It's penalizing someone for not losing early and actually getting his team deep into the playoffs. It makes no sense.

dr3am · Post #152 » by **dr3am** » Mon Jan 12, 2015 8:23 pm

Please stop, i'm not even a Brady hater but he will never be better than Joe Montana, seriously

Post #153 » by **bwgood77** » Mon Jan 12, 2015 9:27 pm

therealbig3 wrote:
Higga wrote:
therealbig3 wrote:I don't understand this notion that Brady somehow isn't that great if he doesn't win. The fact that his team is a contender every single year despite vastly different supporting casts is proof that he's awesome. 1 team out of 32 teams win every year...not being that 1 team doesn't make you a failure. Never mind the fact that he pretty much always gets his team deep into the playoffs too. 9 AFC title games, 5 SB appearances...he's putting his team in position to be that 1 team almost every year. So they haven't won in a little while...so what? If it wasn't for two fluke plays in the last 2 SBs, he would have led them to #4 and #5...just like fluke plays in the first 3 SBs could have negated all 3 of those. Doesn't change the caliber of player he is.

Agreed.

People using the fact that Brady lost two Super Bowls against him is a little silly. His team is elite every year and he was literally two wacky/fluky plays away from winning both of those games.

I've always been on the Peyton Manning side of this argument, but now I'm leaning the other way. Brady is just so damn good in the playoffs in comparison. I think if he wins the Super Bowl this year he is firmly without a doubt the GOAT QB.

Using SB losses against someone is literally one of the dumbest arguments ever. It's penalizing someone for not losing early and actually getting his team deep into the playoffs. It makes no sense.

That's why I think Warner should be in the HOF. He took two **** teams (the year before he started for them) and got them to the SB (twice with the Rams). He also has the three highest passing yard games in Super Bowl history. 48 Super Bowls. 96 qb starts. He has the top 3 out of all 96.

http://www.pro-football-reference.com/s ... eaders.htm

Post #154 » by **bwgood77** » Mon Jan 12, 2015 9:30 pm

dr3am wrote:The Pats blew the Colts out with ease. I don't see why people think Indy is a threat to them, they had no answer for gronk at all. Ravens have always gave brady & the pats problems..it was a nice win by Indy yesterday but the Broncos & Peyton specifically have been playing terrible the entire month of December

SN: And no Brady will not surpass Montana if he beats Seattle in the SB

Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums

I didn't think Indy was but they look like a different team. Some qbs seem to play better with more on the line. Kurt Warner, Andrew Luck, Flacco.

Manning seems to play worse. Brady plays a little worse, at least it seems that way in the past few years until this past game.

I just don't know that I'd EVER count Luck out.

RIPskaterdude · Post #155 » by **RIPskaterdude** » Mon Jan 12, 2015 10:26 pm

Well goodbye John fox

ash_k · Post #156 » by **ash_k** » Mon Jan 12, 2015 10:43 pm

What a great weekend of football!!!

- a team ran for 129 yards, threw for 292 yards with 4 TD passes, with 33 minutes of possessions and still managed to lose the game.

- with that safety Blitz coming clear, amazing vision/throw/catch by Romo/Dez

- Kind of glad to hear that Peyton was injured the last month or so, cause I could not comprehend those miss-throws yesterday..Sanders&Thomas had their men beat.. if true then no reason to retire..

- no doubt that Russel is turning into an Elite QB....at this rate, they wont need Marshawn anymore