dlts20 wrote:Am I the only person not upset by this? I think it was just a quick response to a reporter being a jerk and probably trying to say that the Cavs should be better since they have all these max players and I think Blatt was just moreso tryign to put him in his place. I here responses like that all the time on realgm. People will say that a player is sucking even though he's getting the max and then another person will respond and say that he actually doesnt start getting paid the max to the following year. I dont think it was meant as a diss to Love but moreso to just keep the mouthy reporter straight and to let him know that he doesnt know what he's talking about
Well, it up to your interpretation. Being a "max player" means something. Obviously Blatt couldve been literally remarking that Love isnt making the max, even though HE IS again based on the number of years hes been in the league, he also could have been saying Love isnt a max player. Nobody knows what he meant by it, but OH WELL















































