Rosenthal: Jays, O's still discussing Duquette?
Moderator: JaysRule15
Rosenthal: Jays, O's still discussing Duquette?
- Rhettmatic
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 21,081
- And1: 14,547
- Joined: Jul 23, 2006
- Location: Toronto
-
Rosenthal: Jays, O's still discussing Duquette?
This story apparently won't go away.
[tweet]https://twitter.com/Ken_Rosenthal/status/555399488136040448[/tweet]
[tweet]https://twitter.com/Ken_Rosenthal/status/555399494666567680[/tweet]
[tweet]https://twitter.com/Ken_Rosenthal/status/555399500219842561[/tweet]
Also just noticed Rosenthal is wearing a bow tie in his avatar.
[tweet]https://twitter.com/Ken_Rosenthal/status/555399488136040448[/tweet]
[tweet]https://twitter.com/Ken_Rosenthal/status/555399494666567680[/tweet]
[tweet]https://twitter.com/Ken_Rosenthal/status/555399500219842561[/tweet]
Also just noticed Rosenthal is wearing a bow tie in his avatar.

Sig by the one and only Turbo_Zone.
Re: Rosenthal: Jays, O's still discussing Duquette?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 41,306
- And1: 14,333
- Joined: Aug 19, 2002
-
Re: Rosenthal: Jays, O's still discussing Duquette?
For added confirmation:
[tweet]https://twitter.com/ShiDavidi/status/555409654793404416[/tweet]
[tweet]https://twitter.com/ShiDavidi/status/555409654793404416[/tweet]
2019 will never be forgotten because FLAGS FLY FOREVER
Re: Rosenthal: Jays, O's still discussing Duquette?
- joshgc
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,696
- And1: 5,458
- Joined: Aug 13, 2009
Re: Rosenthal: Jays, O's still discussing Duquette?
Is this guy a good fit for the jays? What do you guys think?
Re: Rosenthal: Jays, O's still discussing Duquette?
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,500
- And1: 201
- Joined: Nov 20, 2011
-
Re: Rosenthal: Jays, O's still discussing Duquette?
joshgc wrote:Is this guy a good fit for the jays? What do you guys think?
Anything that gets the "Beest" out is a positive...
Re: Rosenthal: Jays, O's still discussing Duquette?
- Yosemite Dan
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,431
- And1: 7,893
- Joined: Nov 16, 2006
Re: Rosenthal: Jays, O's still discussing Duquette?
Has built a pretty good team in Baltimore. Why is there an uncomfortable situation over there?
Re: Rosenthal: Jays, O's still discussing Duquette?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 674
- And1: 113
- Joined: Nov 01, 2014
Re: Rosenthal: Jays, O's still discussing Duquette?
[tweet]https://twitter.com/TonyPaul1984/status/555484736097755136[/tweet]
[tweet]https://twitter.com/jonmorosi/status/555490183517585409[/tweet]
[tweet]https://twitter.com/jonmorosi/status/555490183517585409[/tweet]
Re: Rosenthal: Jays, O's still discussing Duquette?
- MikeM
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,046
- And1: 9,897
- Joined: Aug 10, 2006
Re: Rosenthal: Jays, O's still discussing Duquette?
Maybe this is why all our activity has come to a halt
Re: Rosenthal: Jays, O's still discussing Duquette?
-
- 2015 Beat the Commish Champion
- Posts: 17,585
- And1: 11,768
- Joined: Apr 23, 2010
-
Re: Rosenthal: Jays, O's still discussing Duquette?
Wonder what the compensation will be? I am guessing nothing big at all.
Maybe Stilson?
Maybe Stilson?

BrunoSkull
Re: Rosenthal: Jays, O's still discussing Duquette?
- zong
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,289
- And1: 102
- Joined: Sep 27, 2007
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: Rosenthal: Jays, O's still discussing Duquette?
Give them Beeston and call it a day
Re: Rosenthal: Jays, O's still discussing Duquette?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,440
- And1: 2,139
- Joined: Feb 25, 2004
Re: Rosenthal: Jays, O's still discussing Duquette?
Duquette built three very good teams (early-90's Expos, late-90's Red Sox, and recent Orioles), and he is a baseball guy unlike Beeston. So chances are he will green light certain baseball moves, or at least is more likely to, than Beestn probably would. That's just a guess on my part though. I can't imagine AA has much time left if this happens, unless the team makes the playoffs in 2015, as DD is likely connected enough in the game to have his own guy in mind for GM.
I agree, this might be why time has stood still this off-season and nothing has been done since the Saunders trade. Beeston leaving the organization will be a great day.
I agree, this might be why time has stood still this off-season and nothing has been done since the Saunders trade. Beeston leaving the organization will be a great day.
Re: Rosenthal: Jays, O's still discussing Duquette?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,053
- And1: 21,165
- Joined: Dec 07, 2009
Re: Rosenthal: Jays, O's still discussing Duquette?
Man, this organization is messed up. It definitely looks Rogers is undercutting AA here. In any case, they better not give up anything of actual value for Duquette.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
Re: Rosenthal: Jays, O's still discussing Duquette?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,440
- And1: 2,139
- Joined: Feb 25, 2004
Re: Rosenthal: Jays, O's still discussing Duquette?
Randle McMurphy wrote:Man, this organization is messed up. It definitely looks Rogers is undercutting AA here. In any case, they better not give up anything of actual value for Duquette.
AA is definitely going to get the short end of this. At least he made some good moves in his last hurrah, if it is in fact nearing the end for him. I can't see any scenario where AA stays if Duquette is brought in.
Re: Rosenthal: Jays, O's still discussing Duquette?
-
- 2015 Beat the Commish Champion
- Posts: 17,585
- And1: 11,768
- Joined: Apr 23, 2010
-
Re: Rosenthal: Jays, O's still discussing Duquette?
Randle McMurphy wrote:Man, this organization is messed up. It definitely looks Rogers is undercutting AA here. In any case, they better not give up anything of actual value for Duquette.
Who is negotiating the deal from the Jays side?
That's the interesting question.

BrunoSkull
Re: Rosenthal: Jays, O's still discussing Duquette?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,053
- And1: 21,165
- Joined: Dec 07, 2009
Re: Rosenthal: Jays, O's still discussing Duquette?
Wo1verine wrote:Randle McMurphy wrote:Man, this organization is messed up. It definitely looks Rogers is undercutting AA here. In any case, they better not give up anything of actual value for Duquette.
Who is negotiating the deal from the Jays side?
That's the interesting question.
No idea. How could AA reasonably participate in negotiations to acquire the guy who will essentially replace him as top baseball authority in the organization? Bit of a conflict of interest.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
Re: Rosenthal: Jays, O's still discussing Duquette?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,053
- And1: 21,165
- Joined: Dec 07, 2009
Re: Rosenthal: Jays, O's still discussing Duquette?
Michael Bradley wrote:Randle McMurphy wrote:Man, this organization is messed up. It definitely looks Rogers is undercutting AA here. In any case, they better not give up anything of actual value for Duquette.
AA is definitely going to get the short end of this. At least he made some good moves in his last hurrah, if it is in fact nearing the end for him. I can't see any scenario where AA stays if Duquette is brought in.
Not in the long-term anyway. I doubt AA aspires to only be the #2 baseball guy in an organization.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
Re: Rosenthal: Jays, O's still discussing Duquette?
- BigLeagueChew
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,041
- And1: 4,088
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Location: Catcher
-
Re: Rosenthal: Jays, O's still discussing Duquette?
Nothing like some off field BS shortly before Spring Training. Beeston should have said something weeks ago if he wanted out.
Did they have that fancy meeting for season ticket holders yet, where Beeston and AA sit in fancy leather chairs on top of the Jays dugout?
Did they have that fancy meeting for season ticket holders yet, where Beeston and AA sit in fancy leather chairs on top of the Jays dugout?
Re: Rosenthal: Jays, O's still discussing Duquette?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 674
- And1: 113
- Joined: Nov 01, 2014
Re: Rosenthal: Jays, O's still discussing Duquette?
Randle McMurphy wrote:Wo1verine wrote:Randle McMurphy wrote:Man, this organization is messed up. It definitely looks Rogers is undercutting AA here. In any case, they better not give up anything of actual value for Duquette.
Who is negotiating the deal from the Jays side?
That's the interesting question.
No idea. How could AA reasonably participate in negotiations to acquire the guy who will essentially replace him as top baseball authority in the organization? Bit of a conflict of interest.
apparently MLB acts as an arbitrator on matters like this, doesn't really matter, we're not giving up anything valuable, at best they'll get a fringe B-/C+ prospect
Re: Rosenthal: Jays, O's still discussing Duquette?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 69,969
- And1: 33,832
- Joined: Jul 25, 2005
-
Re: Rosenthal: Jays, O's still discussing Duquette?

9. Similarly, IF THOU HAST SPENT the entire offseason predicting that thy team will stink, thou shalt not gloat, nor even be happy, shouldst thou turn out to be correct. Realistic analysis is fine, but be a fan first, a smug smarty-pants second.
Re: Rosenthal: Jays, O's still discussing Duquette?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,053
- And1: 21,165
- Joined: Dec 07, 2009
Re: Rosenthal: Jays, O's still discussing Duquette?
Nights King wrote:Randle McMurphy wrote:Wo1verine wrote:Who is negotiating the deal from the Jays side?
That's the interesting question.
No idea. How could AA reasonably participate in negotiations to acquire the guy who will essentially replace him as top baseball authority in the organization? Bit of a conflict of interest.
apparently MLB acts as an arbitrator on matters like this, doesn't really matter, we're not giving up anything valuable, at best they'll get a fringe B-/C+ prospect
You'd have to even more assume AA has nothing to do with it, then. It's probably Rogers and Angelos doing the negotiations.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
Re: Rosenthal: Jays, O's still discussing Duquette?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 41,306
- And1: 14,333
- Joined: Aug 19, 2002
-
Re: Rosenthal: Jays, O's still discussing Duquette?
There are conflicting reports about whether a deal to let Duquette out of his Oriole contract is close. Some, like Morosi, say no, others say a deal is imminent.
2019 will never be forgotten because FLAGS FLY FOREVER