ImageImage

Trade Targets (postcript on yesterday-other teams)

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

User avatar
ampd
RealGM
Posts: 21,760
And1: 5,150
Joined: Dec 06, 2010

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3881 » by ampd » Tue Feb 10, 2015 10:20 pm

AussieBuck wrote:
ampd wrote:
AussieBuck wrote:Maybe try watching him play?


He's not bad, but his offensive impact is overstated on here, and there is no way I'd pay what the Wolves would ask.

Nobody would pay what the Wolves would ask. You've still entirely wrong about him.


So he's good off the ball, he's not one of the worst shooters in the league, he doesn't have a 50% higher TOV% than Brandon Knight, he's not injury prone, and he hasn't captained mostly average offenses and mediocre defenses on bad teams?

You massively overrate him. He's not a 16 year old phenom anymore. He's 24 and he's still the same player he was at 16.

That's not a bad player, but it's certainly not someone I'd even consider packaging a huge pile of assets for.
GHOSTofSIKMA
RealGM
Posts: 22,806
And1: 8,975
Joined: Jan 21, 2007
Location: NC
     

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3882 » by GHOSTofSIKMA » Tue Feb 10, 2015 10:22 pm

Badgerlander wrote:Playoffs are all halfcourt with very little transition. I think Knight becomes a TO machine and Giannis will get hacked every time he touches the ball. Maybe we win a game or two by hitting a bunch of 3s but unless Giannis puts the team on his back we aren't winning a series.


we have a top 3 defense. of course we can win a series.

since the 11-12 mark, and as our rotations have solidified.... here are some interesting facts.

were 18-11 overall
were 6-8 against teams over .500 and have a +1.57 point diff in those games.
were 12-3 against teams under .500 and have a +7.73 point diff in those games.

heading into the break, over the last 29 games, weve been playing to a 53-54 win pace.... and since that 11-12 mark when we lost to okc... we haven't been out of a single game in the last 2 minutes. not one. worst margin was a 8 point loss.

but recently... weve even been playing better. our defense has held, our offense has improved, and we are now one of the top shooting teams in the league. we have a potential game changing star in giannis emerging. weve been shorthanded playing multiple stretches of games where guys like Jorge and job had to play major minutes because we literally didn't have bodies.

frankly a case could be made that over the last 30 games weve been the strongest team in the east outside of Atlanta. they being a team we blew out on their homecourt by 30. a team I think we match up well against. certainly a case could be made a gelling Cleveland team could pose a problem.... but our defense against their lack of it provides a wonderful opportunity to perhaps steal a game early on their homecourt and make a series with them.

bottom line is you guys have to believe. I know this team certainly does. and for the first time, in a long time, without any more injuries... I think we may have something headed into may.
User avatar
AussieBuck
RealGM
Posts: 42,373
And1: 20,899
Joined: May 10, 2006
Location: Bucks in 7?
 

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3883 » by AussieBuck » Tue Feb 10, 2015 10:26 pm

ampd wrote:
AussieBuck wrote:
ampd wrote:
He's not bad, but his offensive impact is overstated on here, and there is no way I'd pay what the Wolves would ask.

Nobody would pay what the Wolves would ask. You've still entirely wrong about him.


So he's good off the ball, he's not one of the worst shooters in the league, he doesn't have a 50% higher TOV% than Brandon Knight, he's not injury prone, and he hasn't captained mostly average offenses and mediocre defenses on bad teams?

You massively overrate him. He's not a 16 year old phenom anymore. He's 24 and he's still the same player he was at 16.

That's not a bad player, but it's certainly not someone I'd even consider packaging a huge pile of assets for.

Congrats on your gianniparker level post. For a good poster you're an all time bad PG evaluater.
emunney wrote:
We need a man shaped like a chicken nugget with the shot selection of a 21st birthday party.


GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:
if you combined jabari parker, royal ivey, a shrimp and a ball sack youd have javon carter
User avatar
ampd
RealGM
Posts: 21,760
And1: 5,150
Joined: Dec 06, 2010

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3884 » by ampd » Tue Feb 10, 2015 10:32 pm

If we can find that piece that helps shore up our rebounding problems that would help dramatically. Our biggest problem in the playoffs is going to be the Bulls and Wizards (and to a lesser extend the Raps) destroy us on the glass.
User avatar
ampd
RealGM
Posts: 21,760
And1: 5,150
Joined: Dec 06, 2010

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3885 » by ampd » Tue Feb 10, 2015 10:45 pm

AussieBuck wrote:
ampd wrote:
AussieBuck wrote:Nobody would pay what the Wolves would ask. You've still entirely wrong about him.


So he's good off the ball, he's not one of the worst shooters in the league, he doesn't have a 50% higher TOV% than Brandon Knight, he's not injury prone, and he hasn't captained mostly average offenses and mediocre defenses on bad teams?

You massively overrate him. He's not a 16 year old phenom anymore. He's 24 and he's still the same player he was at 16.

That's not a bad player, but it's certainly not someone I'd even consider packaging a huge pile of assets for.

Congrats on your gianniparker level post. For a good poster you're an all time bad PG evaluater.


I really do have a blind spot for scoring PGs :D

I like Rubio, but to be most effective, I think he needs a team constructed around him in much the same way Rondo does. I wouldn't give up a lot to try that experiment here. That's not a knock against Rubio, I just think we have 2 players on the roster already who will end up better than him and I'd rather fit a PG to them and not the other way around.
User avatar
Matches Malone
RealGM
Posts: 37,418
And1: 27,534
Joined: Nov 23, 2005
     

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3886 » by Matches Malone » Tue Feb 10, 2015 11:07 pm

[tweet]https://twitter.com/ericbuenning/status/565282713419411456[/tweet]
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?
User avatar
JayMKE
RealGM
Posts: 29,411
And1: 17,259
Joined: Jun 21, 2010
Location: LA
     

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3887 » by JayMKE » Tue Feb 10, 2015 11:09 pm

I still don't trust Hammond
FREE GIANNIS
User avatar
SkilesTheLimit
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,780
And1: 1,795
Joined: Oct 23, 2010
Location: Pop Up Zone
     

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3888 » by SkilesTheLimit » Tue Feb 10, 2015 11:14 pm

Kidd could turn around tomorrow and pull off a win now trade. Hammond has as much say in personnel as any of us do at this point.
We're going to turn this team around 360 degrees.
- Jason Kidd
User avatar
Chapter29
RealGM
Posts: 14,593
And1: 1,235
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Location: Wauwatosa, WI
   

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3889 » by Chapter29 » Tue Feb 10, 2015 11:15 pm

ampd wrote:
AussieBuck wrote:Maybe try watching him play?


He's not bad, but his offensive impact is overstated on here, and there is no way I'd pay what the Wolves would ask.


How much more do you think Rubio will get over Knight?
Giannis
is
UponUs
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 108,643
And1: 42,756
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3890 » by ReasonablySober » Tue Feb 10, 2015 11:17 pm

Hammond keeps trotting out the future rhetoric, while the actual people in charge play for today.
User avatar
Turk Nowitzki
RealGM
Posts: 34,638
And1: 11,636
Joined: Feb 26, 2010
Location: on the Hellmouth
     

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3891 » by Turk Nowitzki » Tue Feb 10, 2015 11:20 pm

Chapter29 wrote:
ampd wrote:
AussieBuck wrote:Maybe try watching him play?


He's not bad, but his offensive impact is overstated on here, and there is no way I'd pay what the Wolves would ask.


How much more do you think Rubio will get over Knight?

Rubio got a 4 year/$55 million extension back in October. I wouldn't give that to Knight but I imagine he/his agent will aim high, he might very well get something similar to that if he finishes the year well.
User avatar
Badgerlander
RealGM
Posts: 27,064
And1: 7,488
Joined: Jun 29, 2007
     

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3892 » by Badgerlander » Tue Feb 10, 2015 11:23 pm

GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:
Badgerlander wrote:Playoffs are all halfcourt with very little transition. I think Knight becomes a TO machine and Giannis will get hacked every time he touches the ball. Maybe we win a game or two by hitting a bunch of 3s but unless Giannis puts the team on his back we aren't winning a series.


we have a top 3 defense. of course we can win a series.

since the 11-12 mark, and as our rotations have solidified.... here are some interesting facts.

were 18-11 overall
were 6-8 against teams over .500 and have a +1.57 point diff in those games.
were 12-3 against teams under .500 and have a +7.73 point diff in those games.

heading into the break, over the last 29 games, weve been playing to a 53-54 win pace.... and since that 11-12 mark when we lost to okc... we haven't been out of a single game in the last 2 minutes. not one. worst margin was a 8 point loss.

but recently... weve even been playing better. our defense has held, our offense has improved, and we are now one of the top shooting teams in the league. we have a potential game changing star in giannis emerging. weve been shorthanded playing multiple stretches of games where guys like Jorge and job had to play major minutes because we literally didn't have bodies.

frankly a case could be made that over the last 30 games weve been the strongest team in the east outside of Atlanta. they being a team we blew out on their homecourt by 30. a team I think we match up well against. certainly a case could be made a gelling Cleveland team could pose a problem.... but our defense against their lack of it provides a wonderful opportunity to perhaps steal a game early on their homecourt and make a series with them.

bottom line is you guys have to believe. I know this team certainly does. and for the first time, in a long time, without any more injuries... I think we may have something headed into may.


So what, we are talking Playoff Basketball. HALF COURT OFFENSE? Bueller? Show me some stats on our halfcourt offense and defense being better than any of the top five teams in the east, because thats what wins ballgames in the playoffs. Our vaunted bench isn't going to outscore anybody in the playoffs. I love what we are doing so far but when our offense struggles its turn over and chucker city and lately even against teams we should be stomping on.
Shoot, Move, and Communicate...

Spoiler:

I'm just here for my own amusement,"don't take offense at my innuendo..."


Countless waze, we pass the daze...

A little nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men.
User avatar
worthlessBucks
RealGM
Posts: 22,566
And1: 4,932
Joined: Jan 26, 2005
Location: Bucks Logo
   

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3893 » by worthlessBucks » Tue Feb 10, 2015 11:29 pm

"Anything we are looking at today is still hopefully going to be focused on maybe acquiring a piece or adding pieces that could be future long-term players for this organization," Hammond said.

John really needs to be wearing a blindfold when he speaks to the media. He is in the dark.
Go Bucks!
GHOSTofSIKMA
RealGM
Posts: 22,806
And1: 8,975
Joined: Jan 21, 2007
Location: NC
     

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3894 » by GHOSTofSIKMA » Tue Feb 10, 2015 11:52 pm

Badgerlander wrote:
GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:
we have a top 3 defense. of course we can win a series.

since the 11-12 mark, and as our rotations have solidified.... here are some interesting facts.

were 18-11 overall
were 6-8 against teams over .500 and have a +1.57 point diff in those games.
were 12-3 against teams under .500 and have a +7.73 point diff in those games.

heading into the break, over the last 29 games, weve been playing to a 53-54 win pace.... and since that 11-12 mark when we lost to okc... we haven't been out of a single game in the last 2 minutes. not one. worst margin was a 8 point loss.

but recently... weve even been playing better. our defense has held, our offense has improved, and we are now one of the top shooting teams in the league. we have a potential game changing star in giannis emerging. weve been shorthanded playing multiple stretches of games where guys like Jorge and job had to play major minutes because we literally didn't have bodies.

frankly a case could be made that over the last 30 games weve been the strongest team in the east outside of Atlanta. they being a team we blew out on their homecourt by 30. a team I think we match up well against. certainly a case could be made a gelling Cleveland team could pose a problem.... but our defense against their lack of it provides a wonderful opportunity to perhaps steal a game early on their homecourt and make a series with them.

bottom line is you guys have to believe. I know this team certainly does. and for the first time, in a long time, without any more injuries... I think we may have something headed into may.


So what, we are talking Playoff Basketball. HALF COURT OFFENSE? Bueller? Show me some stats on our halfcourt offense and defense being better than any of the top five teams in the east, because thats what wins ballgames in the playoffs. Our vaunted bench isn't going to outscore anybody in the playoffs. I love what we are doing so far but when our offense struggles its turn over and chucker city and lately even against teams we should be stomping on.


our bench hasn't been winning games like it was early... its been our starters. even knights turned all his numbers around. we have a +7.7 diff and 12-3 record against teams we should be stomping on lately. I have no idea what your talking about there. and the reason half court offense in the playoffs gets stifled is that DEFENSE gets turned up. that's our teams strength! its DEFENSE that determines playoff basketball... not teams deciding to play half court offense just because. defensive intensity is what drives that difference......and that will play directly into our hands!

I believe our system is built for the playoffs. top notch swarming defense with a mini san antonio plug and play offense. an offense where multiple players can hit the 3 ball. offense that doesn't rely on just one or two shotmakers. we play a lesser version of exactly what won last years title.... a lesser version of exactly what Atlanta and gs are doing. that's WHY weve been successful. this rhetoric about what this team cant do is meaningless. were winning ball games exactly the way id want to enter the playoffs. good defense and nobody playing salmons level outlier offense. I understand why fans might be gunshy about giving them credit but as has been stated previously..... pt diffs and expected w/l's show this team playing right where they should be. there isn't anything fake going on here.
User avatar
raferfenix
RealGM
Posts: 24,271
And1: 4,585
Joined: Apr 05, 2003

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3895 » by raferfenix » Wed Feb 11, 2015 12:20 am

Regardless of whether Kidd would or could push for a win now trade, it's better that Hammond is saying this -- especially in contrast to attempting to justify previous win now deadline deals.

While it doesn't appear as if the Bucks will make a major trade prior to the 2 p.m. CT deadline on Feb. 19, Hammond didn't rule out making a deal if it fits into the team's future plans.

The last time Milwaukee was in the playoff race, it dealt young forward Tobias Harris to the Orlando Magic as part of a six-player trade that brought J.J. Redick to the Bucks.
User avatar
VooDoo7
RealGM
Posts: 25,957
And1: 22,292
Joined: Jan 14, 2012
Location: WI

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3896 » by VooDoo7 » Wed Feb 11, 2015 12:37 am

SkilesTheLimit wrote:Kidd could turn around tomorrow and pull off a win now trade. Hammond has as much say in personnel as any of us do at this point.

Bucks trade Kenyon Martin for Elden Campbell.
User avatar
AussieBuck
RealGM
Posts: 42,373
And1: 20,899
Joined: May 10, 2006
Location: Bucks in 7?
 

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3897 » by AussieBuck » Wed Feb 11, 2015 1:03 am

ampd wrote:
AussieBuck wrote:
ampd wrote:
So he's good off the ball, he's not one of the worst shooters in the league, he doesn't have a 50% higher TOV% than Brandon Knight, he's not injury prone, and he hasn't captained mostly average offenses and mediocre defenses on bad teams?

You massively overrate him. He's not a 16 year old phenom anymore. He's 24 and he's still the same player he was at 16.

That's not a bad player, but it's certainly not someone I'd even consider packaging a huge pile of assets for.

Congrats on your gianniparker level post. For a good poster you're an all time bad PG evaluater.


I really do have a blind spot for scoring PGs :D

I like Rubio, but to be most effective, I think he needs a team constructed around him in much the same way Rondo does. I wouldn't give up a lot to try that experiment here. That's not a knock against Rubio, I just think we have 2 players on the roster already who will end up better than him and I'd rather fit a PG to them and not the other way around.

He's very different from Rondo, I honestly don't think you've watched much of him at all. He specializes in getting guys the ball where they want it quickly. He spent last season bring the ball up and handing it to Love and playing off ball until a play broke down where he'd get the ball back to create something fast in the second half of the clock. That offense was killer too. Rubio would be an absurd weapon kickstarting breaks to Giannis and Parker. He's also great at post entries, pick and roll passing and hitting cutters. He's not a guy dribbling out the clock waiting for an open jumpshooter.
emunney wrote:
We need a man shaped like a chicken nugget with the shot selection of a 21st birthday party.


GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:
if you combined jabari parker, royal ivey, a shrimp and a ball sack youd have javon carter
User avatar
Badgerlander
RealGM
Posts: 27,064
And1: 7,488
Joined: Jun 29, 2007
     

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3898 » by Badgerlander » Wed Feb 11, 2015 1:18 am

GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:our bench hasn't been winning games like it was early... its been our starters. even knights turned all his numbers around. we have a +7.7 diff and 12-3 record against teams we should be stomping on lately. I have no idea what your talking about there.


Our starters have definitely improved over the season. Knight is shooting 37% the last 10 games. I'm talking about being down 17 against the Nets, the Celtics pulling within 1 point with 2 minutes left, overtime against the Lakers...


GHOSTofSIKMA wrote: and the reason half court offense in the playoffs gets stifled is that DEFENSE gets turned up. that's our teams strength! its DEFENSE that determines playoff basketball... not teams deciding to play half court offense just because. defensive intensity is what drives that difference......and that will play directly into our hands!

I believe our system is built for the playoffs. top notch swarming defense with a mini san antonio plug and play offense. an offense where multiple players can hit the 3 ball. offense that doesn't rely on just one or two shotmakers. we play a lesser version of exactly what won last years title.... a lesser version of exactly what Atlanta and gs are doing. that's WHY weve been successful. this rhetoric about what this team cant do is meaningless. were winning ball games exactly the way id want to enter the playoffs. good defense and nobody playing salmons level outlier offense. I understand why fans might be gunshy about giving them credit but as has been stated previously..... pt diffs and expected w/l's show this team playing right where they should be. there isn't anything fake going on here.


Defense puts you in position to win but you still have to be able to outscore the opponent. The other teams D gets turned up too, and refs let a lot of contact go especially if its not a star player. When the chips are down you have to have a guy that can score when he has to. The last 5 games Giannis has stepped up to an amazing level of play. San Antonio has Duncan, Parker, and Ginobli to lean on. Right now we are winning with defense and a lot of transition, transition that won't be there come playoff time. Call it rhetoric because you want to feel good but I need to see some halfcourt offense bloom before I have any confidence in winning a playoff series.
Shoot, Move, and Communicate...

Spoiler:

I'm just here for my own amusement,"don't take offense at my innuendo..."


Countless waze, we pass the daze...

A little nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men.
User avatar
steger_3434
RealGM
Posts: 18,470
And1: 5,680
Joined: Mar 05, 2005
Location: Getting Rowdy in Section 212 with Squad 6
       

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3899 » by steger_3434 » Wed Feb 11, 2015 1:40 am

Has it been found out what the trade was that wichmae went crazy over a few weeks ago?
yiyiyi wrote:give rockets Redd ,houston give you T-MAC in return .please help rockets!
i dont want see that woman anymore !
User avatar
AussieBuck
RealGM
Posts: 42,373
And1: 20,899
Joined: May 10, 2006
Location: Bucks in 7?
 

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3900 » by AussieBuck » Wed Feb 11, 2015 1:42 am

steger_3434 wrote:Has it been found out what the trade was that wichmae went crazy over a few weeks ago?

Do we know if he survived that trip?
emunney wrote:
We need a man shaped like a chicken nugget with the shot selection of a 21st birthday party.


GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:
if you combined jabari parker, royal ivey, a shrimp and a ball sack youd have javon carter

Return to Milwaukee Bucks