Trade Targets (postcript on yesterday-other teams)

Baddy Chuck · Post #4721 » by **Baddy Chuck** » Tue Feb 17, 2015 2:19 am

paulpressey25 wrote:Nothing was better on this board than that 10am to 2pm period at deadline day in 2013.

Until we keep Jefferson, Redd, Sessions and the gang.

Jez2983 · Post #4722 » by **Jez2983** » Tue Feb 17, 2015 2:19 am

paulpressey25 wrote:I love Cinematographer rolling the Julius Randle ball down the hall here. These deadlines are always great. Nothing was better on this board than that 10am to 2pm period at deadline day in 2013. Less than 72 hours baby!

I really feel that this trade deadline will be straight from one of Bill S's finest:

"Much Ado About Nothing"

Not that this bothers me. I love rampant speculation, even if nothing happens!

Eeavers57 · Post #4723 » by **Eeavers57** » Tue Feb 17, 2015 2:20 am

Charlotte seems really quiet right now. Where does Noah Vonleh fit into their future plans?

emunney · Post #4724 » by **emunney** » Tue Feb 17, 2015 2:21 am

Is Hammond on the phone, or is the phone on Hammond?

Post #4725 » by **paulpressey25** » Tue Feb 17, 2015 2:22 am

Charles Gardner was on WTMJ tonight with Greg and Jeff. The good news is that the Bucks are now relevant so Greg and Jeff do a segment on them. The expected news was Gardner offered nothing at all in ten minutes. This is why we shouldn't wish for Woelfel to go away. Gery entertains.

The only comment Gardner made of note is that the team is down four guys to season ending events, which could lend credence to a trade to bring in a contributor simply because they are short on bodies.

JustinCredible · Post #4726 » by **JustinCredible** » Tue Feb 17, 2015 2:23 am

I don't get the Randle fit. How do we play defense with Randle, Jabari, and Giannis as our bigs? Randle or Jabari are going to be mismatched with somebody. It would be a nice asset to have but the fit is less than ideal.

Post #4727 » by **paulpressey25** » Tue Feb 17, 2015 2:23 am

Baddy Chuck wrote:Until we keep Jefferson, Redd, Sessions and the gang.

Herb and Hammond are gone. We've got Wall Street high rollers and Jason Kidd in the action now. I think that bodes well for something.

Baddy Chuck · Post #4728 » by **Baddy Chuck** » Tue Feb 17, 2015 2:25 am

paulpressey25 wrote:
Baddy Chuck wrote:Until we keep Jefferson, Redd, Sessions and the gang.

Herb and Hammond are gone. We've got Wall Street high rollers and Jason Kidd in the action now. I think that bodes well for something.

We going to absorb Norris Cole and call it a night.

Jez2983 · Post #4729 » by **Jez2983** » Tue Feb 17, 2015 2:26 am

JustinCredible wrote:I don't get the Randle fit. How do we play defense with Randle, Jabari, and Giannis as our bigs? Randle or Jabari are going to be mismatched with somebody. It would be a nice asset to have but the fit is less than ideal.

I guess this was why Cinematographer suggested this would lead to another trade.

Wisky4life · Post #4730 » by **Wisky4life** » Tue Feb 17, 2015 2:28 am

Money doesn't work out well but here is another laughable attempt for a trade by me.

Milwaukee In: Randle and Green
Phoenix In: Ersan and Boozer
Lakers In: Knight and Dragic

Maybe a few picks here and there.

JustinCredible · Post #4731 » by **JustinCredible** » Tue Feb 17, 2015 2:31 am

Jez2983 wrote:
JustinCredible wrote:I don't get the Randle fit. How do we play defense with Randle, Jabari, and Giannis as our bigs? Randle or Jabari are going to be mismatched with somebody. It would be a nice asset to have but the fit is less than ideal.

I guess this was why Cinematographer suggested this would lead to another trade.

Another Tottenham fan....nice!

I'd be all for acquiring young assets, but I really don't expect us to make moves that hurt us this year and give us zero help other than in the future. Even with new ownership, that seems unlikely given our record. Randle and Stauskas are zero help now, but perhaps we do go ahead and flip them right away again before the deadline. I really am not expecting much for moves other than Ersan being gone.

GHOSTofSIKMA · Post #4732 » by **GHOSTofSIKMA** » Tue Feb 17, 2015 2:31 am

gibson for mayo, 2015 mil 1st
stauskas, Thompson for ersan
cole for cash

knight, bayless, jorge
middleton, cole, stauskas
giannis, Dudley
gibson, Thompson, kenyon
Henson, zaza

so that's what were working on or what?

JustinCredible · Post #4733 » by **JustinCredible** » Tue Feb 17, 2015 2:32 am

Wisky4life wrote:Money doesn't work out well but here is another laughable attempt for a trade by me.

Milwaukee In: Randle and Green
Phoenix In: Ersan and Boozer
Lakers In: Knight and Dragic

Maybe a few picks here and there.

That is a dumpster fire for the Suns.

RW23 · Post #4734 » by **RW23** » Tue Feb 17, 2015 2:33 am

Wisky4life wrote:Money doesn't work out well but here is another laughable attempt for a trade by me.

Milwaukee In: Randle and Green
Phoenix In: Ersan and Boozer
Lakers In: Knight and Dragic

Maybe a few picks here and there.

Yeah, it's a good thing you put "laughable" in there. The Phoenix FO would cease to exist.

JustinCredible · Post #4735 » by **JustinCredible** » Tue Feb 17, 2015 2:33 am

GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:gibson for mayo, 2015 mil 1st
stauskas, Thompson for ersan
cole for cash

knight, bayless, jorge
middleton, cole, stauskas
giannis, Dudley
gibson, Thompson, kenyon
Henson, zaza

so that's what were working on or what?

Hopefully it would be the LAC 1st and not our 1st for Gibson. I don't think I'd make that trade for Taj given his age.

cinematographer · Post #4736 » by **cinematographer** » Tue Feb 17, 2015 2:33 am

Jez2983 wrote:
JustinCredible wrote:I don't get the Randle fit. How do we play defense with Randle, Jabari, and Giannis as our bigs? Randle or Jabari are going to be mismatched with somebody. It would be a nice asset to have but the fit is less than ideal.

I guess this was why Cinematographer suggested this would lead to another trade.

Randle is available. We can meet LAL's asking price. There are multiple teams who can as well.I think Randle to MKE is just an academic exercise, and I wouldn't entertain the idea unless Randle would be flipped for the real return.

JayMKE · Post #4737 » by **JayMKE** » Tue Feb 17, 2015 2:34 am

Wisky4life wrote:Money doesn't work out well but here is another laughable attempt for a trade by me.

Milwaukee In: Randle and Green
Phoenix In: Ersan and Boozer
Lakers In: Knight and Dragic

Maybe a few picks here and there.

Suns fans will literally want to fight you for even proposing this

RW23 · Post #4738 » by **RW23** » Tue Feb 17, 2015 2:35 am

GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:gibson for mayo, 2015 mil 1st

I'm pretty sure I saw a report that chicago wouldn't trade Gibson without getting another big back.

Eeavers57 · Post #4739 » by **Eeavers57** » Tue Feb 17, 2015 2:37 am

RW23 wrote:
GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:gibson for mayo, 2015 mil 1st

I'm pretty sure I saw a report that chicago wouldn't trade Gibson without getting another big back.

Gibson for Mayo, 2015 mil 1st, and JOB. There, problem solved. JOB is pretty big...

JustinCredible · Post #4740 » by **JustinCredible** » Tue Feb 17, 2015 2:38 am

cinematographer wrote:
Jez2983 wrote:
JustinCredible wrote:I don't get the Randle fit. How do we play defense with Randle, Jabari, and Giannis as our bigs? Randle or Jabari are going to be mismatched with somebody. It would be a nice asset to have but the fit is less than ideal.

I guess this was why Cinematographer suggested this would lead to another trade.

Randle is available. We can meet LAL's asking price. There are multiple teams who can as well.I think Randle to MKE is just an academic exercise, and I wouldn't entertain the idea unless Randle would be flipped for the real return.

Why would we have to be the middl man? Why wouldn't the end team just trade with the Lakers instead of having him pass through us?