Trade Targets (postcript on yesterday-other teams)

Frank Nova · Post #6541 » by **Frank Nova** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 2:41 pm

Badgerlander wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/ESPNSteinLine/status/568414827376463873[/tweet]

I guess that means they want 8 1st rounders and a $1,000 edible arrangement for Lawson then.

LittleRooster · Post #6542 » by **LittleRooster** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 2:41 pm

Swan Vox wrote:
Badgerlander wrote:http://onmilwaukee.com/sports/articles/ ... dline.html

"Right now, anything we're looking at today is still, hopefully, going to be focused on maybe acquiring a piece or talking about adding pieces that can be future, long-term player for this organization," Hammond said.

(If anything, the Bucks would love to "reverse" the Redick deal and send a veteran away for a team-controlled second-year player.)

I found the bolded portion odd. Like, you don't know John? You're the GM, well more like the highest paid scout or something working for Kidd.

SkilesTheLimit · Post #6543 » by **SkilesTheLimit** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 2:42 pm

Badgerlander wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/ESPNSteinLine/status/568414827376463873[/tweet]

If that's what they want for those two, I'd imagine they want 10 first round picks for Lawson.

SkilesTheLimit · Post #6544 » by **SkilesTheLimit** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 2:44 pm

Matches Malone wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/GeryWoelfel/status/568415720041799680[/tweet]

Knight and Clips 1st?

Who says no?

mlloyd10 · Post #6545 » by **mlloyd10** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 2:45 pm

SkilesTheLimit wrote:
Matches Malone wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/GeryWoelfel/status/568415720041799680[/tweet]

Knight and Clips 1st?

Who says no?

Everyone should

Wisky4life · Post #6546 » by **Wisky4life** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 2:47 pm

SkilesTheLimit wrote:
Matches Malone wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/GeryWoelfel/status/568415720041799680[/tweet]

Knight and Clips 1st?

Who says no?

Knight, Ersan, Clips 1st for Dragic and Plumelee

Then force Dragic to sign 4/$60 mil extension.

I didn't like the trade from the other 60 pages but today, i'm optimistic.

raferfenix · Post #6547 » by **raferfenix** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 2:47 pm

If Dragic really had the Pacers on his list of teams he would go to, and the Bucks were willing to pay him max, maybe we make that list too.

But even if he verbally says he wants to resign it'd be a big risk if things don't work out and he bails.

Matches Malone · Post #6548 » by **Matches Malone** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 2:48 pm

SkilesTheLimit wrote:
Matches Malone wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/GeryWoelfel/status/568415720041799680[/tweet]

Knight and Clips 1st?

Who says no?

I want nothing to do with Goran. Not only has he shown character flaws the past 24 hours with his criticisms, but he wants to play for a big market team and wants the max. Oh and he's already gonna be 29 in May.

Ron Swanson · Post #6549 » by **Ron Swanson** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 2:49 pm

SkilesTheLimit wrote:
Matches Malone wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/GeryWoelfel/status/568415720041799680[/tweet]

Knight and Clips 1st?

Who says no?

He's pretty much stated that he won't resign long term anywhere but LA, New York, and Boston. I think that Dragic is completely off our radar right now.

Newz · Post #6550 » by **Newz** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 2:52 pm

I love Dragic as a player, I think he's awesome. If we were at the point where we were ready to compete I would be all for adding him and locking him up on a 4 year deal or something along those lines. But with where we are as a team right now I value Knight a lot more than him... even if Knight is overpaid.

When Giannis and Jabari are hitting their stride Knight will still be in his prime. Dragic would be in his mid-30's. I just have very little interest in him, especially since he's likely to command a max deal.

theFireBlanket · Post #6551 » by **theFireBlanket** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 2:53 pm

EastSideBucksFan wrote:
JimmyTheKid wrote:Little off topic, but that "inside look" at the Bucks' war room during last year's draft day that they run on FSN, where Hammond wanted to give up a couple 2nds and cash to move up to #24, who do we all think he was targeting? I think I read where someone said Ingles. But originally I thought it was McGary. Anyone have insight here?

McGary

Because they still would've had 31 for Inglis who wasn't going anywhere else ahead of that.

Badgerlander · Post #6552 » by **Badgerlander** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 2:53 pm

100 million reasons not to want Dragic

theFireBlanket · Post #6553 » by **theFireBlanket** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 2:56 pm

LittleRooster wrote:
Swan Vox wrote:
Badgerlander wrote:http://onmilwaukee.com/sports/articles/ ... dline.html

I found the bolded portion odd. Like, you don't know John? You're the GM, well more like the highest paid scout or something working for Kidd.

Sanders. Other Gms wanting more than they're comfortable dealing.

Post #6554 » by **Ruzious** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 3:00 pm

Newz wrote:I love Dragic as a player, I think he's awesome. If we were at the point where we were ready to compete I would be all for adding him and locking him up on a 4 year deal or something along those lines. But with where we are as a team right now I value Knight a lot more than him... even if Knight is overpaid.

When Giannis and Jabari are hitting their stride Knight will still be in his prime. Dragic would be in his mid-30's. I just have very little interest in him, especially since he's likely to command a max deal.

Great points. I love the way he plays, but unfortunately you are correct.

Post #6555 » by **humanrefutation** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 3:05 pm

Any deal for Dragic is predicated on him signing an extension with us...which he won't.

chonestown · Post #6556 » by **chonestown** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 3:05 pm

Badgerlander wrote:100 million reasons not to want Dragic

Okay. Name one.

machu46 · Post #6557 » by **machu46** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 3:06 pm

SkilesTheLimit wrote:
Matches Malone wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/GeryWoelfel/status/568415720041799680[/tweet]

Knight and Clips 1st?

Who says no?

I would say no.

machu46 · Post #6558 » by **machu46** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 3:07 pm

Lol, Broussard reporting the Knicks have offered Hardaway and Calderon for Dragic. How nice of them.

imithanos · Post #6559 » by **imithanos** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 3:07 pm

chonestown wrote:
Badgerlander wrote:100 million reasons not to want Dragic

Okay. Name one.

One. He won't sign in off-season with us.

Giannis Parker · Post #6560 » by **Giannis Parker** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 3:10 pm

chonestown wrote:
Badgerlander wrote:100 million reasons not to want Dragic

Okay. Name one.

100million (referring to his 100m demanded contract)

Dragic is decent, but not a max player.