ImageImage

Not exactly 'shorts'....

Moderators: Moonbeam, DeBlazerRiddem

User avatar
James72
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,984
And1: 474
Joined: May 05, 2013
     

Re: Not exactly 'shorts'.... 

Post#141 » by James72 » Thu Feb 19, 2015 5:56 pm

Gee is a awesome wing defender from what i remember that can nail 3s. Wright better step his game up.
Goldbum
Analyst
Posts: 3,302
And1: 651
Joined: Jul 12, 2001
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
     

Re: Not exactly 'shorts'.... 

Post#142 » by Goldbum » Thu Feb 19, 2015 5:56 pm

As I've said before i would have prefered Chandler. Still AAA's advanced stats and efficiency are impressive. P
From Portland to Reno to Vegas to LA to SLC and on to HotLanta. Winning at life. Too Blessed to be Stressed
Ripcity4life
Analyst
Posts: 3,062
And1: 219
Joined: Jul 09, 2006

Re: Not exactly 'shorts'.... 

Post#143 » by Ripcity4life » Thu Feb 19, 2015 5:59 pm

Sam amick Tweet :

With caveat that one call could change everything, I'm told the Portland Trailblazers are done dealing.
Oneluckbox
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,268
And1: 499
Joined: Nov 16, 2013
Location: Australia
     

Re: Not exactly 'shorts'.... 

Post#144 » by Oneluckbox » Thu Feb 19, 2015 6:00 pm

So Prince off the table now? I didn't really like the idea of an aging vet being played behind Nic and i spose Gee is fine. Hopefully he's not a total scrub. Who knows, maybe he'll play hard for a winning team and be a decent guy off the bench.

What PGs are available to fill up the last spot?
DaVoiceMaster
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 21,159
And1: 2,456
Joined: Sep 26, 2003
Contact:
   

Re: Not exactly 'shorts'.... 

Post#145 » by DaVoiceMaster » Thu Feb 19, 2015 6:00 pm

Will he still go after Prince if he is waived?
DaVoiceMaster
Senior Mod - Trail Blazers
12/27/2017 - 01/03/2018
Blazinaway
General Manager
Posts: 8,873
And1: 1,635
Joined: Jan 27, 2009

Re: Not exactly 'shorts'.... 

Post#146 » by Blazinaway » Thu Feb 19, 2015 6:03 pm

DaVoiceMaster wrote:Will he still go after Prince if he is waived?


any chance we take a flyer on Javale if Philly waives him?
User avatar
James72
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,984
And1: 474
Joined: May 05, 2013
     

Re: Not exactly 'shorts'.... 

Post#147 » by James72 » Thu Feb 19, 2015 6:38 pm

Blazinaway wrote:
DaVoiceMaster wrote:Will he still go after Prince if he is waived?


any chance we take a flyer on Javale if Philly waives him?


Neither Kaman or Mcgee can play the four, so he would just sit on the bench. Also...chemistry.
Brandon-Clyde
RealGM
Posts: 23,496
And1: 5,904
Joined: May 29, 2008
     

Re: Not exactly 'shorts'.... 

Post#148 » by Brandon-Clyde » Thu Feb 19, 2015 6:56 pm

James72 wrote:
Blazinaway wrote:
DaVoiceMaster wrote:Will he still go after Prince if he is waived?


any chance we take a flyer on Javale if Philly waives him?


Neither Kaman or Mcgee can play the four, so he would just sit on the bench. Also...chemistry.

I would have no problem with having a 7 ft tall player available at need if all it cost was signing him to a minimum contract. Also it would allow the team the option of not exercising Kaman's option during the offseason by having an alternative
There are no constraints on the human mind, no walls around the human spirit, no barriers to our progress except those we ourselves erect." -- Ronald Reagan
Norm2953
RealGM
Posts: 16,500
And1: 2,235
Joined: May 17, 2003
Location: Oregon

Re: Not exactly 'shorts'.... 

Post#149 » by Norm2953 » Thu Feb 19, 2015 7:09 pm

The only thing I remember about Gee is the Dame hit a 3 pointer at the buzzer to beat the Cavs.

The guy who comes out a winner is Meyers who now has a real opportunity for PT behind LA and Rolo.
In the past, every time he has a chance to play he gets hurt. Portland no longer has the big man
depth to cover an injury up front unless they opt for a 10 day contract or a bought up player.
User avatar
James72
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,984
And1: 474
Joined: May 05, 2013
     

Re: Not exactly 'shorts'.... 

Post#150 » by James72 » Thu Feb 19, 2015 7:24 pm

Norm2953 wrote:The only thing I remember about Gee is the Dame hit a 3 pointer at the buzzer to beat the Cavs.

The guy who comes out a winner is Meyers who now has a real opportunity for PT behind LA and Rolo.
In the past, every time he has a chance to play he gets hurt. Portland no longer has the big man
depth to cover an injury up front unless they opt for a 10 day contract or a bought up player.


You still have freeland who practiced yesterday. 4 solid bigs.
Ripcity4life
Analyst
Posts: 3,062
And1: 219
Joined: Jul 09, 2006

Re: Not exactly 'shorts'.... 

Post#151 » by Ripcity4life » Thu Feb 19, 2015 7:26 pm

Looks like there was no 2nd round pick just the future 1st and the 3 players

I did not think they had any 2nd's til like 2030 -- LOL
Ripcity4life
Analyst
Posts: 3,062
And1: 219
Joined: Jul 09, 2006

Re: Not exactly 'shorts'.... 

Post#152 » by Ripcity4life » Thu Feb 19, 2015 8:03 pm

Perkins traded from Thunder but he will be bought out

Now he would be a good fit for the Blazers -- bruiser can rebound
User avatar
JasonStern
RealGM
Posts: 12,281
And1: 4,303
Joined: Dec 13, 2008
 

Re: Not exactly 'shorts'.... 

Post#153 » by JasonStern » Thu Feb 19, 2015 9:28 pm

Ripcity4life wrote:Perkins traded from Thunder but he will be bought out

Now he would be a good fit for the Blazers -- bruiser can rebound


I know Portland has had bad luck at the center position, but the Blazers currently have Lopez, Kaman, and Freeland, plus Aldridge and Leonard able to play spot minutes... I'm not seeing the need.
Because love can burn like a cigarette.
And leave you left with nothing.
Leave you left with nothing.
GreenRiddler
General Manager
Posts: 9,747
And1: 1,444
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Blazer fan from Toronto
     

Re: Not exactly 'shorts'.... 

Post#154 » by GreenRiddler » Thu Feb 19, 2015 9:32 pm

this AAA could get us the 2nd seed. Which would get us.....OKC
User avatar
James72
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,984
And1: 474
Joined: May 05, 2013
     

Re: Not exactly 'shorts'.... 

Post#155 » by James72 » Thu Feb 19, 2015 9:34 pm

GreenRiddler wrote:this AAA could get us the 2nd seed. Which would get us.....OKC


We have a tough schedule, don't see us being higher than 3, lower than 4. My guess is LAC, HOU or DAL
User avatar
PDXKnight
RealGM
Posts: 26,273
And1: 3,196
Joined: May 29, 2007
Location: Portland
   

Re: Not exactly 'shorts'.... 

Post#156 » by PDXKnight » Fri Feb 20, 2015 9:42 pm

James72 wrote:
GreenRiddler wrote:this AAA could get us the 2nd seed. Which would get us.....OKC


We have a tough schedule, don't see us being higher than 3, lower than 4. My guess is LAC, HOU or DAL


Which team is ideal?

Personally Dallas scares me the most out of those teams, they came pretty close to beating sa last season and they've gotten more talent where they needed now. Lac would be ideal, they aren't a great matchup for us in recent history but I feel like they aren't a top tier team and over the course of a best of 7 game series we could do far better against them than we have during the regular season. Also I think Doc is an overrated coach, he won in Boston with a ton of talent but from a schematic point he's not much better than any other coach on a western playoff team other than maybe Mchale. Houston is seemingly beatable since we've done it already but I worry about the revenge factor against them. They'd come out with something to prove against the Blazers and Ariza could give la more trouble as a quicker more agile player than Asik or Dwight did I think.
Wizenheimer
RealGM
Posts: 36,477
And1: 8,186
Joined: May 28, 2007

Re: Not exactly 'shorts'.... 

Post#157 » by Wizenheimer » Fri Feb 20, 2015 10:00 pm

Oden2 wrote:
James72 wrote:
GreenRiddler wrote:this AAA could get us the 2nd seed. Which would get us.....OKC


We have a tough schedule, don't see us being higher than 3, lower than 4. My guess is LAC, HOU or DAL


Which team is ideal?

Personally Dallas scares me the most out of those teams, they came pretty close to beating sa last season and they've gotten more talent where they needed now. Lac would be ideal, they aren't a great matchup for us in recent history but I feel like they aren't a top tier team and over the course of a best of 7 game series we could do far better against them than we have during the regular season. Also I think Doc is an overrated coach, he won in Boston with a ton of talent but from a schematic point he's not much better than any other coach on a western playoff team other than maybe Mchale. Houston is seemingly beatable since we've done it already but I worry about the revenge factor against them. They'd come out with something to prove against the Blazers and Ariza could give la more trouble as a quicker more agile player than Asik or Dwight did I think.


wut?

Ariza is a SF and he's shorter then Chandler Parsons. If the Rockets assigned him to cover LMA, it would be a disaster for them. He wouldn't do any better, probably worse, then Terrance Jones did in the first 2 games last year

as far as the 1st round matchups, I won't worry about them. Blazers will have to play a good team in any matchup and the West this year will probably be a perfect example of "careful what you wish for"

I remember last season that Houston fans were really hoping to draw the Blazers. After the seeding and they did, they were brimming with confidence. After game 2....LOL
GreenRiddler
General Manager
Posts: 9,747
And1: 1,444
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Blazer fan from Toronto
     

Re: Not exactly 'shorts'.... 

Post#158 » by GreenRiddler » Fri Feb 20, 2015 10:02 pm

Oden2 wrote:
James72 wrote:
GreenRiddler wrote:this AAA could get us the 2nd seed. Which would get us.....OKC


We have a tough schedule, don't see us being higher than 3, lower than 4. My guess is LAC, HOU or DAL


Which team is ideal?

Personally Dallas scares me the most out of those teams, they came pretty close to beating sa last season and they've gotten more talent where they needed now.

I am not in the business of piking and choosing who I'd rather have the face as that can bite ya in the butt, but Dallas doesn't scare me at all. Weakest Defense behind the Clips, no rebounding. Rondo looks lost out there, they got no bench and Dirk is old as hell. Did you see him trying to defend the PnR on Westbrook? I felt like they should've used the mercy rule, but no they went at him for 5 straight possessions.
User avatar
JasonStern
RealGM
Posts: 12,281
And1: 4,303
Joined: Dec 13, 2008
 

Re: Not exactly 'shorts'.... 

Post#159 » by JasonStern » Fri Feb 20, 2015 11:48 pm

GreenRiddler wrote:
Oden2 wrote:
James72 wrote:
We have a tough schedule, don't see us being higher than 3, lower than 4. My guess is LAC, HOU or DAL


Which team is ideal?

Personally Dallas scares me the most out of those teams, they came pretty close to beating sa last season and they've gotten more talent where they needed now.

I am not in the business of piking and choosing who I'd rather have the face as that can bite ya in the butt, but Dallas doesn't scare me at all.


Dallas scares me for one reason - Rick Carlisle.
Because love can burn like a cigarette.
And leave you left with nothing.
Leave you left with nothing.
User avatar
jeffhardyfan52
General Manager
Posts: 9,894
And1: 596
Joined: Jul 09, 2006
Location: Portland
Contact:
       

Not exactly 'shorts'.... 

Post#160 » by jeffhardyfan52 » Sat Feb 21, 2015 12:03 am

I kinda want the clippers

Return to Portland Trail Blazers