Blkbrd671 wrote:Bravenewworld wrote:
I dont get whats being argued here.
KD and Bondom, we've been having this discussion for like six months now. We've all known that he either wanted to run the team or be traded, im pretty sure we all got that because of his public statements or some article or whatever, i dont remember when it first came about.
He brought up Deandre jordan's situation in comparison to RJ, i am merely pointing out thats not the same situation as RJ "expected to be traded", he then is arguing that because RJ "expects to be traded" doesn't mean that the FO knows he wants to be traded, which common sense states, makes 0 sense.We knew when the Waiters trade happened, RJ was almost happily shipped out to the Nets for Lopez.... I don't know how anyone but the FO, possibly team and RJ can determine when he "formally asked for a trade", but he and others have definitely made the issue public for at least the entire season, if not longer.
Thank you, that's simply what i am stating. That keeping RJ and letting him be disgruntled sure didn't help his perceived value amongst the league not to mention reports of lockeroom issues. What the response i am getting is that OKC didn't know he wanted out, and i simply don't believe OKC either didn't have dialogue with his agent regarding this, or just did due diligence and planned on him wanting out.
Since your entering this, there's 2 discussions going on.
1. ) with Bondom, the discussion is little more well thought out, and seems bondom tries to understand my posts
2.) all other discussions are basic responses to my discussion with Bondom from other posters, not many of them bring up anything of relevance or anything that i haven't addressed with Bondom in our discussion.
Yah, i actually edited my post and responded to a few things you said.