Slava wrote:ALL HAIL wrote:Slava wrote:You can't bar-tend unless you are 18. What about all the talented 14 year old bartenders who cannot make their fair market money by not being allowed to bar-tend?
If you are going to compare capitalism in the form of inventing a product to seeking an employment with an organization (NBA), then I'd like to question the place that gave you a law degree.
Pretty sure the poster is in favor of a pre-high school ban ... and maybe you're just pointing out that age limits will always exist in sports in some form or fashion.
NBA is an organization that can have its restrictions on who it wants employed. Ultimately they want to select athletes who are mature enough to work in an environment where the scrutiny is high and as such they might feel the need for an age limit. One cannot equate that to Steve Jobs or Zuckerberg dropping out of college, those guys were their own bosses and did not need a team to babysit them.
I remember stories about how the Wizards had a 24 hr caretaker for Kwame Brown when they drafted him, I mean a dude just lived with Kwame, did his grocery shopping, laundry etc to make sure Kwame learns how to live on his own, away from his mama for the first time. Does the league want that kind of responsibility again? They obviously didn't think it was worth and hence the age limit.
The NBA doesn't employ the players, the teams do. The teams are individual businesses that cooperate with the NBA to schedule games and establish a common set of rules. When multiple teams restrict professionals based on age or some other factor besides ability from obtaining employment that could be considered collusion. So far, this right has been collectively bargained away by the players association(in the last agreement). However, restricting the ability of someone not yet a member of that union from obtaining employment is a slippery slope.
If the business owners(owners of the teams), don't want to employ 18-year old kids, that's fine, don't draft them. However, when that 18 year-old kid is LeBron James, Dwight Howard, Kevin Garnett or Anthony Davis(who would've went high as a HS senior) then good luck getting all of the owners to stay away. It requires collusion to keep those kids away from the league in the form of a collective bargaining agreement. The NBPA played ball the last time around but may not feel the need to concede that this time around. Really, this shouldn't even be something that can be collectively bargained but the courts have been very partial towards allowing employees to collectively bargain their own rights. However, in the future that could change.
The NBA would be wise to do away with that stupid rule as sooner or later it's going away any way. It'd be better to get in front of it. It's brilliant for the NBPA to use the race argument especially in light of the Donald Sterling news and other black eyes for the league. Hit them where it hurts...